The Biden Years: Questions Asked

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
91,929
62,826
2,605
Right coast, classified
Why did the State Department more or less put no restrictions on Ukrainian retaliation, including operations against the Russian Black Sea Fleet—but the Secretary of State almost immediately called for a “ceasefire” to prevent Israeli retaliation, a mortal sin if he had dared say that about Ukraine’s similar response to aggression? Would an American diplomat lecture Ukraine about ending the “cycle of violence?”

Why does the U.S. discount any possibility of a strategic response from Russia—which reportedly has some 6,000-7,000 nuclear weapons—to attacks on its homeland, but seems almost terrified about calling Iran to account for its central role in arming and funding terrorists to start a war with Israel by slaughtering 1,200 civilians?

There are likely somewhere between 600,000 and 800,000 total wounded and dead in Ukraine, in the most lethal conflict in Europe since 1945. Why is the U.S. so eager to call for a ceasefire after a fraction of those casualties in Gaza, but it is near-taboo to mention a breather amid the historical carnage, with no end in sight, in Ukraine?



All excellent questions. If we had a media they’d be demanding an answer every day. I think we all know the answers.
 
Mostly because Hamas makes up less than ten percent of the Gaza population.
Most of the retaliation is against innocent civilians who have no place to go.

In Ukraine, Russia is fighting as a military unit and is far from innocent.Ships are fair game
 
Last edited:
War in the middle East with all nations pulled in to it, becomes an immediate World War 3....

Is that what y'all want???
 
Why did the State Department more or less put no restrictions on Ukrainian retaliation, including operations against the Russian Black Sea Fleet—but the Secretary of State almost immediately called for a “ceasefire” to prevent Israeli retaliation, a mortal sin if he had dared say that about Ukraine’s similar response to aggression? Would an American diplomat lecture Ukraine about ending the “cycle of violence?”

Why does the U.S. discount any possibility of a strategic response from Russia—which reportedly has some 6,000-7,000 nuclear weapons—to attacks on its homeland, but seems almost terrified about calling Iran to account for its central role in arming and funding terrorists to start a war with Israel by slaughtering 1,200 civilians?

There are likely somewhere between 600,000 and 800,000 total wounded and dead in Ukraine, in the most lethal conflict in Europe since 1945. Why is the U.S. so eager to call for a ceasefire after a fraction of those casualties in Gaza, but it is near-taboo to mention a breather amid the historical carnage, with no end in sight, in Ukraine?



All excellent questions. If we had a media they’d be demanding an answer every day. I think we all know the answers.

"I'm going to have to refer you to the White House council...." :laughing0301:

1697461276480.jpeg
 
Mostly because Hamas makes up less than ten percent of the Gaza population.
Most of the retaliation is against innocent civilians who have no place to go.

In Ukraine, Russia is fighting as a military unit and is far from innocent.Ships are fair game

It is odd that eh cannot see a difference between a military operation against a military target (i.e. ships of war) and a military operation against a civilian population
 
Why did the State Department more or less put no restrictions on Ukrainian retaliation,
Because they know Ukraine doesn't attack civilians, and won't invade Russian territory.

We get it, supporting Russian fascism and genocide is your goal, but you need better propaganda.

Oh, you'll note the USA hasn't stopped Israel from doing anything, so your propaganda is especially senseless.
 
Enjoy your next three years of nuclear winter. That's what you voted for.

Nuclear weapons are a weapon of last resort

Either a retaliation for a nuclear strike or to save a country at risk of falling to invading armies

Using nukes because you are not successful in an invasion of another country would not be tolerated
 
Because they know Ukraine doesn't attack civilians, and won't invade Russian territory.

We get it, supporting Russian fascism and genocide is your goal, but you need better propaganda.

Oh, you'll note the USA hasn't stopped Israel from doing anything, so your propaganda is especially senseless.
And Israel doesn’t target civilians.

Carpet bombing Gaza?

You freaks lie and lie and lie.
 
Nuclear weapons are a weapon of last resort

Either a retaliation for a nuclear strike or to save a country at risk of falling to invading armies

Using nukes because you are not successful in an invasion of another country would not be tolerated
Would not be tolerated.

Hilarious!

Iran and North Korea are rolling on the floor.
 
Mostly because Hamas makes up less than ten percent of the Gaza population.
Most of the retaliation is against innocent civilians who have no place to go.

In Ukraine, Russia is fighting as a military unit and is far from innocent.Ships are fair game
Bullshit. Hamas has been their elected leaders for decades.

And it took just one text as thousands of rockets and terrorists were staging.

Not one tip came.
 

Forum List

Back
Top