The Arrogance of the Warmers

[Old Rocks]

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Of course the real scientists in the American Institute of Physics state differantly. But what the hell do Phd Physicists know about physics?

 

[gslack]

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Of course the real scientists in the American Institute of Physics state differantly. But what the hell do Phd Physicists know about physics?

I want to know what you know about physics?

 

[Old Rocks]

Enough to know Wirebender is full of shit, and that you are a complete ignoramous.

 

[gslack]

Enough to know Wirebender is full of shit, and that you are a complete ignoramous.

Sure MENSA boy sure...

 

[Old Rocks]

So he is not a scientist or a climatologist. Thanks...

So? Tim Osborn isn't a computer programmer and that doesn't stop any of the warmers from accepting his version of "climate modeling."

You don't really need to be a scientist or a climatologist to read a graph that shows declining temps for ten years. Reading the same info from UAH, RSS, Hadcrut and NOAA might lead one to believe that the real scientists who do this for a living are collecting data that reveals cooling across ten years.

While they do compare data, one source to the next, the actual collection is done independantly.

Indepedant thinking seems to be a foreign concept to the lock steppers on the Warmer Bandwagon.

Really?

UAH Global Temperature Update for September 2011: +0.29 deg. C « Roy Spencer, Ph. D.

According to the graph there, almost the whole time for the last decade, the running average has been above all the high points but the high point of 1998 of that average.

So how do you get the cooling for the last decade? And have it at the same time the warmest decade in the last 180 years? Possibly the warmest decade in the last 2000 years?

Come on now, I want to see the explanation of how the decade can be cooling and still be the warmest during the time that we have been recording temperatures.

 

[IanC]

So? Tim Osborn isn't a computer programmer and that doesn't stop any of the warmers from accepting his version of "climate modeling."

You don't really need to be a scientist or a climatologist to read a graph that shows declining temps for ten years. Reading the same info from UAH, RSS, Hadcrut and NOAA might lead one to believe that the real scientists who do this for a living are collecting data that reveals cooling across ten years.

While they do compare data, one source to the next, the actual collection is done independantly.

Indepedant thinking seems to be a foreign concept to the lock steppers on the Warmer Bandwagon.

Really?

UAH Global Temperature Update for September 2011: +0.29 deg. C « Roy Spencer, Ph. D.

According to the graph there, almost the whole time for the last decade, the running average has been above all the high points but the high point of 1998 of that average.

So how do you get the cooling for the last decade? And have it at the same time the warmest decade in the last 180 years? Possibly the warmest decade in the last 2000 years?

Come on now, I want to see the explanation of how the decade can be cooling and still be the warmest during the time that we have been recording temperatures.

really Rocks? you cant figure out how it can be warmest now but still cooling?

most of the surface is water which take a lot of time to heat up or cool down. the 90's saw a lot of warming but since then there has been little or none. every year goes up or down compared to the previous year not compared to the average of the last 30 or 150 years. 1998 was the warmest year but it has cooled since then. to get back down to the average would be a huge loss of heat for one individual year.

boil a pot of water then turn off the heat. the water is going to be 'above average' for a long time even though it is cooling. speaking of water, the sea level rise has deaccelerated for quite a few years now which is a pretty strong sign of cooling, especially if all that ice is melting as you say.

 

[wirebender]

Enough to know Wirebender is full of shit, and that you are a complete ignoramous.

Really? You weren't even able to comment on the very basic questions I asked you about some equations that you posted. Clearly you don't even know enough about physics to understand the materials that you post, much less know whether those you believe on faith are telling you the truth or simply seeking more funding from people who also don't know, or don't care, whether they are telling the truth.