The Alinsky Way of Governing

The majority of "real" scientist believe that Climate Change is man made.
fountain.jpg


..and you too. How many tons of pollution (physical and gaseous) just one volcanic eruption spews into the atmosphere? I am not for dirty drinking water and breathing smog. Nor do I promote of the careless pollution of the environment. I am pissed off to see new subdivisions emerging instead of rebuilding the old ones, I am outraged when I see deforestation and so on. But manmade climate change is is a lie. Climate change is cyclical in nature first and foremost.
 
I like the way Republicans act as though they already knew who Alinsky was before 2008.



I wonder if they're gonna dig him up? :p
No need, he left his plan to destroy the country from within



Really? How so?
I am sure you can borrow the book from George Soros' library or maybe you can own for free if you do not have it already.



Okay, so you don't know...you're just parroting what you've heard. Thanks for sharing.
Now you are not debating. I had to research what the book was: "Rules for Radicals" It is available in bookstores.
 
I wonder if they're gonna dig him up? :p
No need, he left his plan to destroy the country from within



Really? How so?
I am sure you can borrow the book from George Soros' library or maybe you can own for free if you do not have it already.



Okay, so you don't know...you're just parroting what you've heard. Thanks for sharing.
Now you are not debating. I had to research what the book was: "Rules for Radicals" It is available in bookstores.


Again....what was his plan to destroy the country from within? Did you read the book, or just look up the title?
 
So what you're saying is that you are blinded by hate of the Government?
I have no hate of government. It is a necessary institution when it functions properly. I did not say anything about the government. I named a few public figures who happen to be officials of the government.
A totalitarian government functions properly when it lies to and oppresses people. That's its nature.
A free society government functions properly when it governs in a transparent and honest way. That should be its nature.


Which had nothing to do with the topic at hand...
You accused me of being blinded by the hate of government, I just explained my position on government that you would change you assumption.
 
The majority of "real" scientist believe that Climate Change is man made.
View attachment 39482


..and you too. How many tons of pollution (physical and gaseous) just one volcanic eruption spews into the atmosphere? I am not for dirty drinking water and breathing smog. Nor do I promote of the careless pollution of the environment. I am pissed off to see new subdivisions emerging instead of rebuilding the old ones, I am outraged when I see deforestation and so on. But manmade climate change is is a lie. Climate change is cyclical in nature first and foremost.



I think I'll go with the "real" scientists on this subject.
 
So what you're saying is that you are blinded by hate of the Government?
I have no hate of government. It is a necessary institution when it functions properly. I did not say anything about the government. I named a few public figures who happen to be officials of the government.
A totalitarian government functions properly when it lies to and oppresses people. That's its nature.
A free society government functions properly when it governs in a transparent and honest way. That should be its nature.


Which had nothing to do with the topic at hand...
You accused me of being blinded by the hate of government, I just explained my position on government that you would change you assumption.


Is English your first language?
 
No need, he left his plan to destroy the country from within



Really? How so?
I am sure you can borrow the book from George Soros' library or maybe you can own for free if you do not have it already.



Okay, so you don't know...you're just parroting what you've heard. Thanks for sharing.
Now you are not debating. I had to research what the book was: "Rules for Radicals" It is available in bookstores.


Again....what was his plan to destroy the country from within? Did you read the book, or just look up the title?
I used to study Marxism-Leninsm including dialectical materialism, Communist International including Comintern and so forth. I did not read the book. My studies included the Great October Revolution and events leading to it. So, I probably have a good idea about organizing revolutions.
 
So what you're saying is that you are blinded by hate of the Government?
I have no hate of government. It is a necessary institution when it functions properly. I did not say anything about the government. I named a few public figures who happen to be officials of the government.
A totalitarian government functions properly when it lies to and oppresses people. That's its nature.
A free society government functions properly when it governs in a transparent and honest way. That should be its nature.


Which had nothing to do with the topic at hand...
You accused me of being blinded by the hate of government, I just explained my position on government that you would change you assumption.


Is English your first language?
HOW TO DISABLE SPELL CHECK on this MB? it changes words when there is a typo.
 
Really? How so?
I am sure you can borrow the book from George Soros' library or maybe you can own for free if you do not have it already.



Okay, so you don't know...you're just parroting what you've heard. Thanks for sharing.
Now you are not debating. I had to research what the book was: "Rules for Radicals" It is available in bookstores.


Again....what was his plan to destroy the country from within? Did you read the book, or just look up the title?
I used to study Marxism-Leninsm including dialectical materialism, Communist International including Comintern and so forth. I did not read the book. My studies included the Great October Revolution and events leading to it. So, I probably have a good idea about organizing revolutions.


Again....what was his plan to destroy the country from within?
 
So what you're saying is that you are blinded by hate of the Government?
I have no hate of government. It is a necessary institution when it functions properly. I did not say anything about the government. I named a few public figures who happen to be officials of the government.
A totalitarian government functions properly when it lies to and oppresses people. That's its nature.
A free society government functions properly when it governs in a transparent and honest way. That should be its nature.


Which had nothing to do with the topic at hand...
You accused me of being blinded by the hate of government, I just explained my position on government that you would change you assumption.


Is English your first language?
HOW TO DISABLE SPELL CHECK on this MB? it changes words when there is a typo.



I don't seem to have that problem. :p
 
I am sure you can borrow the book from George Soros' library or maybe you can own for free if you do not have it already.



Okay, so you don't know...you're just parroting what you've heard. Thanks for sharing.
Now you are not debating. I had to research what the book was: "Rules for Radicals" It is available in bookstores.


Again....what was his plan to destroy the country from within? Did you read the book, or just look up the title?
I used to study Marxism-Leninsm including dialectical materialism, Communist International including Comintern and so forth. I did not read the book. My studies included the Great October Revolution and events leading to it. So, I probably have a good idea about organizing revolutions.


Again....what was his plan to destroy the country from within?
I recommend you read the book. I have not read it but as I indicated in my previous post Alinsky had to base his instructional book for RADICALS on studies based on the sources I mentioned before.
 
I have no hate of government. It is a necessary institution when it functions properly. I did not say anything about the government. I named a few public figures who happen to be officials of the government.
A totalitarian government functions properly when it lies to and oppresses people. That's its nature.
A free society government functions properly when it governs in a transparent and honest way. That should be its nature.


Which had nothing to do with the topic at hand...
You accused me of being blinded by the hate of government, I just explained my position on government that you would change you assumption.


Is English your first language?
HOW TO DISABLE SPELL CHECK on this MB? it changes words when there is a typo.



I don't seem to have that problem. :p
Good for you.
 
Okay, so you don't know...you're just parroting what you've heard. Thanks for sharing.
Now you are not debating. I had to research what the book was: "Rules for Radicals" It is available in bookstores.


Again....what was his plan to destroy the country from within? Did you read the book, or just look up the title?
I used to study Marxism-Leninsm including dialectical materialism, Communist International including Comintern and so forth. I did not read the book. My studies included the Great October Revolution and events leading to it. So, I probably have a good idea about organizing revolutions.


Again....what was his plan to destroy the country from within?
I recommend you read the book. I have not read it but as I indicated in my previous post Alinsky had to base his instructional book for RADICALS on studies based on the sources I mentioned before.



Okay, so you were just talking out your ass. You have NO idea of how he had a plan to destroy the country from within. You're just a parrot.
 
I have no hate of government. It is a necessary institution when it functions properly. I did not say anything about the government. I named a few public figures who happen to be officials of the government.
A totalitarian government functions properly when it lies to and oppresses people. That's its nature.
A free society government functions properly when it governs in a transparent and honest way. That should be its nature.


Which had nothing to do with the topic at hand...
You accused me of being blinded by the hate of government, I just explained my position on government that you would change you assumption.


Is English your first language?
HOW TO DISABLE SPELL CHECK on this MB? it changes words when there is a typo.



I don't seem to have that problem. :p
Have a great day. I need to sign off. :)
 
But remember folks, they tell us there is a consensus by 97% of Scientist on Climate change, so why would they be needing to harass others who has a different opinion ? time to wake up to this government or let them steamROLL over us all
Because the fools on the far right think the 97% are wrong and harass them.

You have never been able to take what you dish.
 
Which had nothing to do with the topic at hand...
You accused me of being blinded by the hate of government, I just explained my position on government that you would change you assumption.


Is English your first language?
HOW TO DISABLE SPELL CHECK on this MB? it changes words when there is a typo.



I don't seem to have that problem. :p
Have a great day. I need to sign off. :)


Okay, go read something about Saul Alinsky, and come back when you have something useful to add.
 
I noticed the great racialist, squeeze berry, denies once again his great evil of being a racialist.
 
CarlaDanger-

Dr. William Gray climate skeptic
William Gray PhD - Climate Change Debate - ProCon.org
Dr. Roy Spencer
Dr. John Christy
7 questions with John Christy and Roy Spencer Climate change skeptics for 25 years AL.com
Roy Spencer PhD
The Atmospheric Science Department Dr. John R. Christy

all reknown climate scientists, working for NASA, NOAA, and CSU, received many awards for their research, yet when they dared question the science behind global warming, suddenly they became outcasts.


Roy Spencer is a religious nutcase.

He's also a member of the Heartland Institute, a contributor to the George C. Marshall Institute, and the favorite climatologist of Rush Limbaugh. In addition to being skeptical about the existence of climate change, Dr. Spencer also doubts the theory of evolution. He's a kook.
 
CarlaDanger-

Dr. William Gray climate skeptic
William Gray PhD - Climate Change Debate - ProCon.org
Dr. Roy Spencer
Dr. John Christy
7 questions with John Christy and Roy Spencer Climate change skeptics for 25 years AL.com
Roy Spencer PhD
The Atmospheric Science Department Dr. John R. Christy

all reknown climate scientists, working for NASA, NOAA, and CSU, received many awards for their research, yet when they dared question the science behind global warming, suddenly they became outcasts.


Here's something else the kook fails to mention....

A research scientist with the University of Alabama at Huntsville's Earth System Science Center (ESSC), Roy Spencer is a climate contrarian with solid academic credentials. And his website bio notes that he "has never been asked by any oil company to perform any kind of service. Not even Exxon-Mobil."

But Spencer doesn't disclose his leadership roles in climate skeptic groups financed by Exxon and other key players in what's been dubbed the "climate denial machine": the network of companies, think tanks and foundations that have sought to deny and downplay the scientific consensus that global warming is real and caused in large part by human activity.

Climate-science contrarian Roy Spencer s oil-industry ties
 

Forum List

Back
Top