- Jun 18, 2009
- 34,331
- 18,625
- 1,915
Well now, isn't this interesting. Something I have been advocating for over 15 years.....either make them work for the benefit, volunteer for the benefit, or learn a trade for the benefit......and what happens.....suddenly, they would rather go with less food than work....Yet, its a drop of 79%.....
Here is a little math problem for you all. If we can reduce the entitlement expenditure of the Federal budget to just 21% of its current rate, and apply that 79% to paying off the debt....how long will that take?
Oh, and here is the article.....I haven't verified the facts of the story yet....so there may be more to it than meets the eye....
This Is What Happened When Maine Forced Welfare Recipients To Work For Their Benefits
More at the link
Here is a little math problem for you all. If we can reduce the entitlement expenditure of the Federal budget to just 21% of its current rate, and apply that 79% to paying off the debt....how long will that take?
Oh, and here is the article.....I haven't verified the facts of the story yet....so there may be more to it than meets the eye....
This Is What Happened When Maine Forced Welfare Recipients To Work For Their Benefits
At the close of 2014 approximately 12,000 individuals were enrolled in the state assistance program. Keep in mind that these individuals are adults who aren’t disabled and who don’t have children at home and who are claiming the food-stamp benefits because of a lack of financial resources.
After forcing these individuals to either work part-time for twenty hours each week, enroll in a vocational program, or volunteer for a minimum of twenty-four hours per month, the numbers showed a significant drop from 12,000 enrollees to just over 2,500.
More at the link