Are We Seeing The Last Gasp Of The GOP’s Two Santa Clause Scam?

skews13

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2017
9,433
11,856
2,265
So let’s quickly review how Two Santas works.

Back in 1976 the Republican Party was a smoking ruin. Nixon had resigned after being busted for lying about his “secret plan to end the Vietnam War,” his involvement in the Watergate burglary, and his taking bribes from Jimmy Hoffa and the Milk Lobby. He only avoided prosecution because Gerald Ford pardoned him.

His first Vice President, Spiro Agnew, had also resigned to avoid prosecution for taking bribes.

Newspaper and television editorialists were openly speculating the GOP might implode. The Party hadn’t held the House of Representatives for more than two consecutive years since 1930 (and wouldn’t until 1994), Jerry Ford had ended the War the year before in a national humiliation, the unemployment rate was over 7 percent, as was inflation after hovering around 11 percent the year before.

The Republican Party had little to offer the American people beyond anti-communism, their mainstay since the 1950s.

Americans knew it was Democrats who’d brought them Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment insurance, subsidized college, the right to unionize, antipoverty programs, and sent men to the moon. And they knew Republicans had opposed the “big government spending” associated with every single one of them.

But one man — a Republican strategist and editorial writer for The Wall Street Journal named Jude Wanniski — thought he saw a way out. It was, he argued, a strategy that could eventually bring about a permanent Republican governing majority.

In a WSJ op-ed that year, Wanniski pointed out that Americans thought of Democrats as the “Party of Santa” and Republicans as, essentially, Scrooge. Republicans, he noted, hadn’t even proposed a tax cut in 22 years!

The solution, Wanniski proposed, was for Republicans to start pushing tax cuts whenever the GOP held the White House. This would establish their Santa bona fides, particularly if Democrats objected. It would flip the script so Democrats would fill the role of Scrooge.

To make it even easier for Republicans to cut taxes, Wanniski invented and publicized a new economic theory called Supply-Side Economics. When taxes went down, he said, government revenue would magically go up!

Four years later, when Reagan came into the White House with the election of 1980, he picked up Wanniski’s strategy and doubled down on it. (In the primary of 1980, he’d even run on it: his primary opponent, George Herbert Walker Bush, derided it as “Voodoo Economics.”)

Reagan not only cut taxes on the rich: he also radically increased government spending, goosing the economy into a sugar high while throwing the nation deeply into debt.

Citing Supply-Side Economics, in eight short years Reagan ran up greater deficits than every president from George Washington to Jerry Ford combined, taking our national debt from around $800 billion all the way up to around $2.6 trillion when he left office.

By 1992, when Bill Clinton won the presidency, Reagan and Bush’s debt had climbed to over $4.2 trillion, giving Republicans a chance to double down on Two Santas. Bill Clinton would be their test case.

House Republicans loudly demanded that Clinton “do something!” about the national debt, waving the debt ceiling like a cudgel. Over the next eight years they repeatedly wielded the debt ceiling, shutting down the government twice. The battles lifted Newt Gingrich to the speakership.

Clinton caved, making massive cuts to the social safety net to get a balanced budgetin a gut-shot to the Democratic Santa programs.

By the end of the Clinton presidency the formula was set. When Republicans held the White House, they’d spend like drunken Santas and cut taxes to the bone to drive up the national debt.

When Democrats come into the presidency, Republicans would use the debt ceiling to force them to cut their own social programs and shoot the Democratic Santa.


As I noted last November, when Clinton shot Santa Claus the result was an explosion of Republican wins across the country as GOP politicians campaigned on a “Republican Santa” platform of supply-side tax cuts and pork-rich spending increases.

Democrats had controlled the House of Representatives in almost every single year since the Republican Great Depression of the 1930s, but with Newt Gingrich rigorously enforcing Wanniski’s Two Santa Claus strategy, they used the debt ceiling as a weapon.

State after state turned red and the Republican Party rose to take over, in less than a decade, every single lever of power in the federal government from the Supreme Court to the White House.

Looking at the wreckage of the Democratic Party all around Clinton in 1999, Wanniski wrote a gloating memothat said, in part:

“We of course should be indebted to Art Laffer for all time for his Curve... But as the primary political theoretician of the supply-side camp, I began arguing for the ‘Two Santa Claus Theory’ in 1974. If the Democrats are going to play Santa Claus by promoting more spending, the Republicans can never beat them by promoting less spending. They have to promise tax cuts...”


Raising taxes on corporations he poor to help the rich get richer isn’t that popular?

Who would have thought?
 
Pointing at Republicans as the party of deficit spending is a bit disingenuous.

Barak Obama's $8.7T add to the Debt is the most by any president, by far.

But, the article has a grain of truth that during Republican administrations there is no concern about a "Balanced Budget"

The good news is that during democrat admins the GOP is concerned about a Balanced Budget.

Democrats ALWAYS spend like drunk sailors.
 
Pointing at Republicans as the party of deficit spending is a bit disingenuous.

Barak Obama's $8.7T add to the Debt is the most by any president, by far.

But, the article has a grain of truth that during Republican administrations there is no concern about a "Balanced Budget"

The good news is that during democrat admins the GOP is concerned about a Balanced Budget.

Democrats ALWAYS spend like drunk sailors.
Can you show how the GOP did not increase the debt?
 
Pointing at Republicans as the party of deficit spending is a bit disingenuous.

Barak Obama's $8.7T add to the Debt is the most by any president, by far.

But, the article has a grain of truth that during Republican administrations there is no concern about a "Balanced Budget"

The good news is that during democrat admins the GOP is concerned about a Balanced Budget.

Democrats ALWAYS spend like drunk sailors.
Tax cuts are spending.
 
But, the article has a grain of truth that during Republican administrations there is no concern about a "Balanced Budget"
Is that true right now? Do you see DeSantis winning in 2024 and then blowing a bunch of money? The only time republicans have ever spent a lot of money was for wars. Wars are always expensive.

Can anyone show me when republicans blew money on their own pet projects and wish list stuff like democrats? We arent constructing monuments to the second Amendment. We arent blowing billions on programs for "Christian values". We arent spending millions on a "Ronald Reagan trail". We are sending money overseas to study the target shooting techniques of people in Pakistan. :dunno:
 
Is that true right now? Do you see DeSantis winning in 2024 and then blowing a bunch of money? The only time republicans have ever spent a lot of money was for wars. Wars are always expensive.

What wars did Trump blow a lot of money on?

Trump himself asked for a trillion dollars more in spending than even Obama ever asked for.
 
What wars did Trump blow a lot of money on?

Trump himself asked for a trillion dollars more in spending than even Obama ever asked for.
Despite campaigning as a moderate, President Biden has dramatically accelerated federal spending during his time in office. He has now spent morein his first two years than President Trump did during his last two years at the height of the pandemic.

 
Despite campaigning as a moderate, President Biden has dramatically accelerated federal spending during his time in office. He has now spent morein his first two years than President Trump did during his last two years at the height of the pandemic.


Yes he did. And nobody is trying to argue that him nor the Dems do not spend a shit ton of money.

But you on the right always pretend your beloved party does not do that, yet the facts show otherwise. You all try to give your god a free pass for all the spending he did.
 
Dems owned Congress when the big spending happened.
would you vote for me if i ran for president?

here's my DETAILED agenda

1)cut taxes
2)cut spending
3) grow the jobs
4)carpet bomb enemy nations like China and Russia
 
Yes he did. And nobody is trying to argue that him nor the Dems do not spend a shit ton of money.

But you on the right always pretend your beloved party does not do that, yet the facts show otherwise. You all try to give your god a free pass for all the spending he did.
Who said republican spending hasn’t been out of control? I sure didn’t….

But, I understand, you must defend your diaper wearing god….
 

Forum List

Back
Top