The 2012 Election Is Not About Obama's Record

By Bill Fletcher, Jr., Carl Davidson

The 2012 election will be one of the most polarized and critical elections in recent history.

Let’s cut to the chase. The November 2012 elections will be unlike anything that any of us can remember. It is not just that this will be a close election. It is also not just that the direction of Congress hangs in the balance. Rather, this will be one of the most polarized and critical elections in recent history.

Unfortunately what too few leftists and progressives have been prepared to accept is that the polarization is to a great extent centered on a revenge-seeking white supremacy; on race and the racial implications of the moves to the right in the US political system. It is also focused on a re-subjugation of women, harsh burdens on youth and the elderly, increased war dangers, and reaction all along the line for labor and the working class. No one on the left with any good sense should remain indifferent or stand idly by in the critical need to defeat Republicans this year.

Much More: The 2012 Elections Have Little To Do With Obama's Record

Of course the left will state this. Obama could not possibly run on his record.
So the complicit and highly supportive MSM is creating an image for Obama. It is also assisting on that other campaign angle which is when one's record is garbage, beat your opponent by impugning him or her.
 
For all you wingnuts who try to falsely blame Obama for the national debt, deficits and economy, I invite you to please give us an accounting of the debt that Obama has added - that wasn't a direct or indirect result of Bush actions. The Bush debt clock didn't just stop on the day Obama was sworn in. Let me give you some starting tips: TWO wars that Bush kept OFF budget that Obama keeps ON budget and the Bush tax cuts. In short, Bush-era policies are still driving the numbers.

4524250851_8a16aebb74.jpg


10 Republican Lies About the Bush Tax Cuts | Crooks and Liars
You are going to the well for Obama. You are a follower.
So what. You can post all the lefty blog crap you want. Doesn't change a thing.
Obama's presidency has been an abject failure.
All that matters is public perception.
Oh, the recent spike in gas prices is reason to be optimistic about Obama's chances to lose. For it is HIS policies that are in part responsible for the cost of motor fuel.
 
Obama inherited a MESS - but has done a good job under very difficult circumstances. He has had no help from the party of NO and obstruction.

o-gold.jpg
 
The 2012 Election Is Not About Obama's Record

As Democrats congregate and say in unison...


LET US PRAY........
 
This election will have little to do with Obama's record if Obama has his way. He'd much rather talk about anything else.
 

i hear ya.....but get used to it.....dipshits like Lkunta will keep on saying....." you dont want him there because he is black"......

Oh yeah... That will be their "Custer's last stand" during the campaign. When the polls show Obama even or slightly trailing, the Obama admin will call on the Lefty Hollywood elitists to shout out the race card.
 
For all you wingnuts who try to falsely blame Obama for the national debt, deficits and economy, I invite you to please give us an accounting of the debt that Obama has added - that wasn't a direct or indirect result of Bush actions. The Bush debt clock didn't just stop on the day Obama was sworn in. Let me give you some starting tips: TWO wars that Bush kept OFF budget that Obama keeps ON budget and the Bush tax cuts. In short, Bush-era policies are still driving the numbers.

4524250851_8a16aebb74.jpg


10 Republican Lies About the Bush Tax Cuts | Crooks and Liars

xkvqjdjpg.gif

I get so totally tired of that same bullshit fucking LIE.

Funding for our troops was paid for through a series of appropriation measures.
Your own party voted them into passing, and even threatened to withhold passage if their pet amendment wasn't attached.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_IRAQ?SITE=NYMID&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
WASHINGTON (AP) -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said newly empowered Democrats will not give President Bush a blank check to wage war in Iraq, hinting they could deny funding if he seeks additional troops.
"If the president chooses to escalate the war, in his budget request, we want to see a distinction between what is there to support the troops who are there now," she said in an interview broadcast Sunday
.


The money has always been figured into out debt/deficit.

fs_chart_fed_deficits_397x224.jpg


You pieces of shit don't get to bitch about any-fucking-thing being paid for "off budget".
You know why???

Because you've been running the entire fucking country into a hole because you haven't been paying for anything "ON budget".

There is no FUCKING BUDGET!!!!!!

:cuckoo:


tumblr_lbuswcdZ3t1qdk6zzo1_r1_500.gif
 
For all you wingnuts who try to falsely blame Obama for the national debt, deficits and economy, I invite you to please give us an accounting of the debt that Obama has added - that wasn't a direct or indirect result of Bush actions. The Bush debt clock didn't just stop on the day Obama was sworn in. Let me give you some starting tips: TWO wars that Bush kept OFF budget that Obama keeps ON budget and the Bush tax cuts. In short, Bush-era policies are still driving the numbers.

4524250851_8a16aebb74.jpg


10 Republican Lies About the Bush Tax Cuts | Crooks and Liars
You are going to the well for Obama. You are a follower.
So what. You can post all the lefty blog crap you want. Doesn't change a thing.
Obama's presidency has been an abject failure.
All that matters is public perception.
Oh, the recent spike in gas prices is reason to be optimistic about Obama's chances to lose. For it is HIS policies that are in part responsible for the cost of motor fuel.

Very true, and this is the only area where wingnuts have excelled - with lies and distortions! Many voters are wising up to the wingnut charade.
 
For all you wingnuts who try to falsely blame Obama for the national debt, deficits and economy, I invite you to please give us an accounting of the debt that Obama has added - that wasn't a direct or indirect result of Bush actions. The Bush debt clock didn't just stop on the day Obama was sworn in. Let me give you some starting tips: TWO wars that Bush kept OFF budget that Obama keeps ON budget and the Bush tax cuts. In short, Bush-era policies are still driving the numbers.

Obama is responsible for $5 trillion. No one is swallowing your playground accounting system where you think Obama doesn't have to take credit for this spending or that spending even though it occured during his administration. You credit Bush with every dime of spending that occured during his administration. You credit him with all Social Secuirty spending, all medicare spending, all Medicaid spending, all welfare spending, all food stamp spending and all defense spending, even though Democrats created almost all those programs.
 
Can the RWers in here answer this one, simple question:

Why hasn't Mittens come out the gate leaps and bounds AHEAD of Obama in the polls?

If this election is such a shoe-in, if Obama has been doing so badly, Mittens should be LEAPS and BOUNDS AHEAD of Obama.

Why has Mint Raw Money been spending TWICE the amount of money on his campaign than Obama has been just to maintain a steady SECOND place?

What's really going on?
 
By Bill Fletcher, Jr., Carl Davidson

The 2012 election will be one of the most polarized and critical elections in recent history.

Let’s cut to the chase. The November 2012 elections will be unlike anything that any of us can remember. It is not just that this will be a close election. It is also not just that the direction of Congress hangs in the balance. Rather, this will be one of the most polarized and critical elections in recent history.

Unfortunately what too few leftists and progressives have been prepared to accept is that the polarization is to a great extent centered on a revenge-seeking white supremacy; on race and the racial implications of the moves to the right in the US political system. It is also focused on a re-subjugation of women, harsh burdens on youth and the elderly, increased war dangers, and reaction all along the line for labor and the working class. No one on the left with any good sense should remain indifferent or stand idly by in the critical need to defeat Republicans this year.

Much More: The 2012 Elections Have Little To Do With Obama's Record

I am sure you hope it's not about Obama's Record.
 
Playing the white guilt race card and saying that after 3 1/2 years of his failed policies he still has no resonsibity for the disaster, incredible. What this election is going to be about is leftist liberal lying their fool asses off.

Get ready for the most incredible, fantastic and preposterous lies ever uttered in public. This election is going to be the most sickening assault on reality you've ever witnessed.
 
The 2012 Election Is Not About Obama's Record

no, now it is about the 1% duo Romney & Ryan, the House passed Republican Budget and the Republican War on Woman ...

.
 
Can the RWers in here answer this one, simple question:

Why hasn't Mittens come out the gate leaps and bounds AHEAD of Obama in the polls?

If this election is such a shoe-in, if Obama has been doing so badly, Mittens should be LEAPS and BOUNDS AHEAD of Obama.

Why has Mint Raw Money been spending TWICE the amount of money on his campaign than Obama has been just to maintain a steady SECOND place?

What's really going on?

Only in your twisted Reality is the Challenger suppose to "come our way ahead right out of the Gate" This Election has never been a sure thing for anyone, Its going to be extremely Close, and any moron, on either side saying different is just plain wrong.
 
The 2012 election is about the direction of the nation. Even obama knows it. He even says it. Will we return to the principles of a Constitutional Republic or go forward into socialism?

It's hilarious that Obama believes that argument helps him.
 
Last edited:
the_true_cost_of_george_w_bushs_magical_thinking-460x307.jpg


See, that’s the real cost of George W. Bush’s magical thinking. By any rational accounting, Bush and the GOP Congress that gave him everything he wanted from 2001 to 2007 should be held responsible for the entire $10.6 trillion national debt — along with the $1.3 trillion yearly deficit they handed to Obama, as well as the Wall Street crisis and bank bailouts.

It’s that simple: With no Bush income tax cuts, no unfunded Medicare drug benefit, and no off-budget Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the U.S. balance sheet would have been in fine shape for his successor. Then government investment needed to rescue the economy from the doldrums wouldn’t have seemed so alarming.

Instead, heeding Dick Cheney’s observation that “Reagan proved deficits don’t matter,” the Bush administration topped-up Scrooge McDuck’s bullion pool. Now Scrooge funds think tanks paying store-bought “scholars” to argue that the massive debt they created is all the Democrats’ fault for seducing grandma with socialist schemes like Medicare and Social Security.

More: The true cost of George W. Bush’s magical thinking - Salon.com
 
The 2012 election is about the direction of the nation. Even obama knows it. He even says it. Will we return to the principles of a Constitutional Republic or go forward into socialism?
So long as he can keep people's eyes crossed and forgetting that people who graduated from college 2 or 3 years ago still may not have a job yet.

And that little 8.25% unemployment? A lot of people just aren't counted as out of work anymore, and it frankly, is not because they're disinterested. It's that they can't get steady work.
 
Can the RWers in here answer this one, simple question:

Why hasn't Mittens come out the gate leaps and bounds AHEAD of Obama in the polls?

If this election is such a shoe-in, if Obama has been doing so badly, Mittens should be LEAPS and BOUNDS AHEAD of Obama.

Why has Mint Raw Money been spending TWICE the amount of money on his campaign than Obama has been just to maintain a steady SECOND place?

What's really going on?

It's simple: There are a lot of turds like you sucking on the government tit.
 
Here's how it's done
During a bad economy the blame is placed on the president if the president is a Republican. If congress is controlled by Republicans then congress and the president get's the blame
If congress is controlled by democrats with a Republican president it's not congress fault because it's a Republican president,

If we have a democrat in the white house with a democratic controlled congress it's the last Republican presidents fault unless he also has a Republican congress. How ever if we have a democratic controlled senate and republican controlled house with a democratic president then it's the houses fault to also include the preceding Republican president. At no time shall a democrat be blamed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top