That Rainbow Whitehouse Light Display Took How Many Days To Set Up?

[Montrovant]

Might I suggest that any criminal investigation into this matter include interviewing the following poster?
]

You suggest all sorts of Konspiracy Krap.

No one is stopping you.

We have

1. Two US Supreme Court Justices who were performing gay marriages while the question of "should the fed preside over all 50 states, approving gay marriage without states' consent?" was pending. There is now serious talk of impeaching them and retrying the case. If there ever was a case for impeaching a Justice, Ginsburg and Kagan have made that case for Congress.

2. A Whitehouse rainbow light display, perfectly aligned and tested, fully lit just hours after the Ruling saying "the fed is forcing all 50 states to recognize gay marriages".

3. A blogger named "Skylar" (the same one who was bragging how orphanages should have their funding cut off if they refuse to adopt out to gay men or women coming to get little boys or little girls to bring home) saying he knew exactly how the Ruling was going to come down, months in advance of it even being Heard, down to the exact case laws they'd cite and who would author the Opinion. Which is pretty creepy if you think about it.

Put all three of them together and you have what on its face appears to be treachery and contempt for the US Constitution, its bylaws, the description of the separation of powers and the required decorum for both the SCOTUS and the POTUS. In other words you have a group of people who just a hundred years or so ago would've been wearing braided rope neckties.

This is the best post you have ever done! OMG!





Skylar is the secret master behind the gay conspiracy in this country! Thank you for ferreting his true identity out, Sil!

Must you queers ALWAYS screech?

Did my use of exclamation points bother you? And now I'm queer?

 

[Skylar]

Might I suggest that any criminal investigation into this matter include interviewing the following poster?
]

You suggest all sorts of Konspiracy Krap.

No one is stopping you.

We have

1. Two US Supreme Court Justices who were performing gay marriages while the question of "should the fed preside over all 50 states, approving gay marriage without states' consent?" was pending. There is now serious talk of impeaching them and retrying the case. If there ever was a case for impeaching a Justice, Ginsburg and Kagan have made that case for Congress.

2. A Whitehouse rainbow light display, perfectly aligned and tested, fully lit just hours after the Ruling saying "the fed is forcing all 50 states to recognize gay marriages".

3. A blogger named "Skylar" (the same one who was bragging how orphanages should have their funding cut off if they refuse to adopt out to gay men or women coming to get little boys or little girls to bring home) saying he knew exactly how the Ruling was going to come down, months in advance of it even being Heard, down to the exact case laws they'd cite and who would author the Opinion. Which is pretty creepy if you think about it.

Put all three of them together and you have what on its face appears to be treachery and contempt for the US Constitution, its bylaws, the description of the separation of powers and the required decorum for both the SCOTUS and the POTUS. In other words you have a group of people who just a hundred years or so ago would've been wearing braided rope neckties.

This is the best post you have ever done! OMG!





Skylar is the secret master behind the gay conspiracy in this country! Thank you for ferreting his true identity out, Sil!

Kneel! Bow!

Bwahahahahaha!

(sigh....if only I had a well oiled mustache to twirl....or a blonde to lash to rail road tracks)

 

[Syriusly]

Might I suggest that any criminal investigation into this matter include interviewing the following poster?
]

You suggest all sorts of Konspiracy Krap.

No one is stopping you.

We have

1. Two US Supreme Court Justices who were performing gay marriages while the question of "should the fed preside over all 50 states, approving gay marriage without states' consent?" was pending. There is now serious talk of impeaching them and retrying the case. If there ever was a case for impeaching a Justice, Ginsburg and Kagan have made that case for Congress.

2. A Whitehouse rainbow light display, perfectly aligned and tested, fully lit just hours after the Ruling saying "the fed is forcing all 50 states to recognize gay marriages".

3. A blogger named "Skylar" (the same one who was bragging how orphanages should have their funding cut off if they refuse to adopt out to gay men or women coming to get little boys or little girls to bring home) saying he knew exactly how the Ruling was going to come down, months in advance of it even being Heard, down to the exact case laws they'd cite and who would author the Opinion. Which is pretty creepy if you think about it.

Put all three of them together and you have what on its face appears to be treachery and contempt for the US Constitution, its bylaws, the description of the separation of powers and the required decorum for both the SCOTUS and the POTUS. In other words you have a group of people who just a hundred years or so ago would've been wearing braided rope neckties.

This is the best post you have ever done! OMG!





Skylar is the secret master behind the gay conspiracy in this country! Thank you for ferreting his true identity out, Sil!

Must you queers ALWAYS screech?

Must you bigots always embrace the Nazi's?

 

[Syriusly]

The whole world knows who the loons are. And it isn't the people who are disgusted by the queer president or the minority of homonazis he's set against the majority.

Ah yes the loony pro-Nazi homophobes like you- who think that a man who has two children, has been married over 20 years- and has always dated women- well he must be a 'queer'.

Of course you also probably think he is a Muslim too- since he eats pork, drinks alcohol, was married in a Christian church, and had his children baptized.

Did you by anychance get born on Bizarro world?

 

[mdk]

There really isn't any end to the amount of people involved in Sil's vast and far reaching conspiracy. All the polling agencies, all the courts that didn't rule the way she wished, a majority of the Justices, the White House, every study that doesn't ft her narrative, Dylan Roof, Oprah, Terror Alerts, and now...Skylar. lol.

We predicted Sil would lose her shit after this ruling but I didn't anticipate it going to such extremes. She is becoming more delirious by the day.

 

[Skylar]

In Sil's world......being completely clueless and utterly wrong on every point is actually a virtue. A demonstration that you aren't part of the imaginary 'conspiracy' and had no foreknowledge of the ruling.

The 'incompetence is integrity' motif is a new one.

 

[Silhouette]

What do you know? Another page buried by the usual crowd employing ad hominems and diversion to get people to forget we are talking about the POTUS having foreknowledge (setting up the rainbow lights and testing them in advance) of how the gay marriage Ruling was going to go.

 

[Skylar]

What do you know? Another page buried by the usual crowd employing ad hominems and diversion to get people to forget we are talking about the POTUS having foreknowledge (setting up the rainbow lights and testing them in advance) of how the gay marriage Ruling was going to go.

Says the guy that folded me into another batshit conspiracy theory.

By name.

 

[Montrovant]

What do you know? Another page buried by the usual crowd employing ad hominems and diversion to get people to forget we are talking about the POTUS having foreknowledge (setting up the rainbow lights and testing them in advance) of how the gay marriage Ruling was going to go.

Yes, we are all diverting away from the topic that has already been addressed on multiple occasions by different posters. It would not take long to set up the colored lights. There is no need for it to have been done prior to the ruling. Even if it was done prior, all that indications is preparation. As has been pointed out with various examples, people and organizations often set things up, including celebrations, prior to the outcome of an event being known.

There is no reason to think this had to be set up prior to the ruling because adding color to the White House spotlights is a trivial procedure. Even if it were not, or if the bureaucracy involved made it take longer than it should, and the lighting was set up prior to the ruling, only in your gay-hating, conspiracy creating mind is that indicative of some sort of collusion in the USSC voting. Had the ruling gone the other way the colors could simply have been removed.

You incredibly obtuse, repetitive Chicken Little.

 

[Silhouette]

Did they have a cross light display on hand in case the Ruling went the other way?

 

[Silhouette]

It would not take long to set up the colored lights. There is no need for it to have been done prior to the ruling. Even if it was done prior, all that indications is preparation. As has been pointed out with various examples, people and organizations often set things up, including celebrations, prior to the outcome of an event being known.
There is no reason to think this had to be set up prior to the ruling because adding color to the White House spotlights is a trivial procedure. Even if it were not, or if the bureaucracy involved made it take longer than it should, and the lighting was set up prior to the ruling, only in your gay-hating, conspiracy creating mind is that indicative of some sort of collusion in the USSC voting. Had the ruling gone the other way the colors could simply have been removed...

The arrogance of setting up and testing the lighting before the Ruling would be beyond the pale. Add to that the insult of actually displaying it. Not to mention the danger to national security given that the number one complaint of terrorist muslims citing their main beef with the US is that we are the infidels, depraved, immoral etc. For simple reasons of keeping Americans safe, the proper thing to do would be to have a muted response.

And what does the idiot in the Whitehouse do? Approves of a reckless display of arrogance...as if all Americans support gay marriage. The lie is that a majority of Americans do. And that's why they battled so friggin' hard to keep it from a popular vote.

This was a act of facism. That display might as well have been the nazi flag, for how it represented true democracy. He should just paint a hammer and sickle on the front of the Whitehouse and be done with the formalities.

 

[koshergrl]

It would not take long to set up the colored lights. There is no need for it to have been done prior to the ruling. Even if it was done prior, all that indications is preparation. As has been pointed out with various examples, people and organizations often set things up, including celebrations, prior to the outcome of an event being known.
There is no reason to think this had to be set up prior to the ruling because adding color to the White House spotlights is a trivial procedure. Even if it were not, or if the bureaucracy involved made it take longer than it should, and the lighting was set up prior to the ruling, only in your gay-hating, conspiracy creating mind is that indicative of some sort of collusion in the USSC voting. Had the ruling gone the other way the colors could simply have been removed...

The arrogance of setting up and testing the lighting before the Ruling would be beyond the pale. Add to that the insult of actually displaying it. Not to mention the danger to national security given that the number one complaint of terrorist muslims citing their main beef with the US is that we are the infidels, depraved, immoral etc. For simple reasons of keeping Americans safe, the proper thing to do would be to have a muted response.

And what does the idiot in the Whitehouse do? Approves of a reckless display of arrogance...as if all Americans support gay marriage. The lie is that a majority of Americans do. And that's why they battled so friggin' hard to keep it from a popular vote.

This was a act of facism. That display might as well have been the nazi flag, for how it represented true democracy. He should just paint a hammer and sickle on the front of the Whitehouse and be done with the formalities.

Yup.

 

[Syriusly]

What do you know? Another page buried by the usual crowd employing ad hominems and diversion to get people to forget we are talking about the POTUS having foreknowledge (setting up the rainbow lights and testing them in advance) of how the gay marriage Ruling was going to go.

Another page buried by sane people pointing out your insane Konspiracy theories.

 

[Syriusly]

It would not take long to set up the colored lights. There is no need for it to have been done prior to the ruling. Even if it was done prior, all that indications is preparation. As has been pointed out with various examples, people and organizations often set things up, including celebrations, prior to the outcome of an event being known.
There is no reason to think this had to be set up prior to the ruling because adding color to the White House spotlights is a trivial procedure. Even if it were not, or if the bureaucracy involved made it take longer than it should, and the lighting was set up prior to the ruling, only in your gay-hating, conspiracy creating mind is that indicative of some sort of collusion in the USSC voting. Had the ruling gone the other way the colors could simply have been removed...

The arrogance of setting up and testing the lighting before the Ruling would be beyond the pale..

Actually just good planning- as I pointed out before- San Francisco planned for the World Series win actually in advance of the win.

In your world that would mean a Konspiracy to rig the World Series.

In anyone else's world, it just means good contingency planning.

 

[Skylar]

It would not take long to set up the colored lights. There is no need for it to have been done prior to the ruling. Even if it was done prior, all that indications is preparation. As has been pointed out with various examples, people and organizations often set things up, including celebrations, prior to the outcome of an event being known.
There is no reason to think this had to be set up prior to the ruling because adding color to the White House spotlights is a trivial procedure. Even if it were not, or if the bureaucracy involved made it take longer than it should, and the lighting was set up prior to the ruling, only in your gay-hating, conspiracy creating mind is that indicative of some sort of collusion in the USSC voting. Had the ruling gone the other way the colors could simply have been removed...

The arrogance of setting up and testing the lighting before the Ruling would be beyond the pale.

Nope. You're simply offering hysteric overreaction as your argument. And your ability to assess 'arrogance' is about as useful as your ability to assess the law. Namely, non-existent.

Do you have anything beyond emotion based conspiracy batshit to offer us here?

 

[Skylar]

It would not take long to set up the colored lights. There is no need for it to have been done prior to the ruling. Even if it was done prior, all that indications is preparation. As has been pointed out with various examples, people and organizations often set things up, including celebrations, prior to the outcome of an event being known.
There is no reason to think this had to be set up prior to the ruling because adding color to the White House spotlights is a trivial procedure. Even if it were not, or if the bureaucracy involved made it take longer than it should, and the lighting was set up prior to the ruling, only in your gay-hating, conspiracy creating mind is that indicative of some sort of collusion in the USSC voting. Had the ruling gone the other way the colors could simply have been removed...

The arrogance of setting up and testing the lighting before the Ruling would be beyond the pale..

Actually just good planning- as I pointed out before- San Francisco planned for the World Series win actually in advance of the win.

In your world that would mean a Konspiracy to rig the World Series.

In anyone else's world, it just means good contingency planning.

And the outcome of the World Series was a literal toss up. Whereas this ruling came down as it was widely expected it would by legal experts across the country.

 

[Montrovant]

Did they have a cross light display on hand in case the Ruling went the other way?

I can't imagine there would be. Not only because a different ruling would not be a victory for Christian rights in the way the actual ruling was for gay rights; not only because the opposite of gay rights isn't Christianity; not only because the administration and Democrat part in general seem to be on the side of same sex marriage; but also because unlike the rainbow colors, a cross actually might take the kind of work and time you keep thinking the rainbow took. The White House doesn't have lights set up in a cross pattern already.

 

[Montrovant]

It would not take long to set up the colored lights. There is no need for it to have been done prior to the ruling. Even if it was done prior, all that indications is preparation. As has been pointed out with various examples, people and organizations often set things up, including celebrations, prior to the outcome of an event being known.
There is no reason to think this had to be set up prior to the ruling because adding color to the White House spotlights is a trivial procedure. Even if it were not, or if the bureaucracy involved made it take longer than it should, and the lighting was set up prior to the ruling, only in your gay-hating, conspiracy creating mind is that indicative of some sort of collusion in the USSC voting. Had the ruling gone the other way the colors could simply have been removed...

The arrogance of setting up and testing the lighting before the Ruling would be beyond the pale. Add to that the insult of actually displaying it. Not to mention the danger to national security given that the number one complaint of terrorist muslims citing their main beef with the US is that we are the infidels, depraved, immoral etc. For simple reasons of keeping Americans safe, the proper thing to do would be to have a muted response.

And what does the idiot in the Whitehouse do? Approves of a reckless display of arrogance...as if all Americans support gay marriage. The lie is that a majority of Americans do. And that's why they battled so friggin' hard to keep it from a popular vote.

This was a act of facism. That display might as well have been the nazi flag, for how it represented true democracy. He should just paint a hammer and sickle on the front of the Whitehouse and be done with the formalities.

How would setting up and testing the lights before the ruling be 'arrogance beyond the pale'? Do you not understand the concept of preparation? Do you not understand the idea of setting something up in case an event happens?

You hate gay marriage, anyone who reads your threads understands that. Trying to spin this into some grand conspiracy in which the USSC ruled based on some kind of.....pressure? bribes? blackmail? from the current administration is just asinine. You regularly attempt to bolster your points through imagination. Why can't you just say you think gay marriage is bad? Why make up this kind of silliness?

 

[bodecea]

Did they have a cross light display on hand in case the Ruling went the other way?

Why would they? Are you trying to say that the cross is the symbol of all gay haters? Is that how we are supposed to look at it?

 

[bodecea]

It would not take long to set up the colored lights. There is no need for it to have been done prior to the ruling. Even if it was done prior, all that indications is preparation. As has been pointed out with various examples, people and organizations often set things up, including celebrations, prior to the outcome of an event being known.
There is no reason to think this had to be set up prior to the ruling because adding color to the White House spotlights is a trivial procedure. Even if it were not, or if the bureaucracy involved made it take longer than it should, and the lighting was set up prior to the ruling, only in your gay-hating, conspiracy creating mind is that indicative of some sort of collusion in the USSC voting. Had the ruling gone the other way the colors could simply have been removed...

The arrogance of setting up and testing the lighting before the Ruling would be beyond the pale. Add to that the insult of actually displaying it. Not to mention the danger to national security given that the number one complaint of terrorist muslims citing their main beef with the US is that we are the infidels, depraved, immoral etc. For simple reasons of keeping Americans safe, the proper thing to do would be to have a muted response.

And what does the idiot in the Whitehouse do? Approves of a reckless display of arrogance...as if all Americans support gay marriage. The lie is that a majority of Americans do. And that's why they battled so friggin' hard to keep it from a popular vote.

This was a act of facism. That display might as well have been the nazi flag, for how it represented true democracy. He should just paint a hammer and sickle on the front of the Whitehouse and be done with the formalities.

What is the real point of having discussions with you when you choose to completely ignore facts?