That Rainbow Whitehouse Light Display Took How Many Days To Set Up?

[Faun]

What "majority?" Most people agree with the Supreme Court decision.

Justice Scalia doesn't:

So? He was not in the majority.

Faun, would it be a problem for you from a Constitutional separation of powers viewpoint to learn that the rainbow lights were set up and tested at the Whitehouse before the Ruling came down from the Supreme Court?

Only if you can prove the White House influenced the decision. Can you?

 

[ABikerSailor]

Hey Sil..................if the lighting schedules are public record, you should be able to find where they spent days testing the lighting.

The reason you can't, is because it wasn't set up days before, it was set up THAT DAY.

But.............if the conspiracy is what helps you sleep at night......................

 

[Syriusly]

COME ON people! WE have bigger fish to fry! This is absolutely ridiculous. It looked pretty. It harmed no one. I do wish they would have done a red, white and blue display for Independence Day though.

Yes, there are MUCH bigger fish to fry than mere lights in rainbow colors.

Number one example of a much bigger fish to fry... Why were those lights set up and tested BEFORE the SCOTUS Ruling on gay-sex marriage was handed down? That's a very big fish indeed..

Yeah- clearly your Konspiracy Kookiness is a Big Fish now.

LOL.......

 

[Syriusly]

Might I suggest that any criminal investigation into this matter include interviewing the following poster?
]

You suggest all sorts of Konspiracy Krap.

No one is stopping you.

 

[Syriusly]

In the 10 or so hours of daylight left after the announcement of the SCOTUS decision, I'm pretty sure they could have made the light display happen before sunset.

Sheesh..................some people are acting like the WH has only 1 groundskeeper who is ancient and can't get around very fast.

To swap out gels? Minutes.

And to test the display before it was lit?

I thought this issue was put to bed already? What in the hell are you complaining about now?

Iowa lights help bathe White House in rainbow colors

Lights that were donated from an Oskaloosa company in 2008 helped illuminate the White House in rainbow colors following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on same-sex marriage Friday.

OH MY GOD- this just shows that the KONSPIRACY goes all the way back to 2008!

 

[Syriusly]

What "majority?" Most people agree with the Supreme Court decision.

Justice Scalia doesn't:

Justice Antonin Scalia is chastising the Supreme Court’s landmark decision legalizing same-sex marriage on Friday as an affront to the principle of democratic rule...Scalia argues in his opinion that the court is increasingly creating policy rather than serving as a neutral arbiter...“Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court,” he writes...“This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves.”.. ..But he wrote that he views the opinion as an overreach by the court, and chides the justices as “hardly a cross-section of America.”..He notes that all the justices graduated from Harvard or Yale Law School, eight grew up on the coasts, and that not one is an evangelical Christian or a Protestant, religions that make up significant chunks of the American population. ..“To allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation,” he writes.

Faun, would it be a problem for you from a Constitutional separation of powers viewpoint to learn that the rainbow lights were set up and tested at the Whitehouse before the Ruling came down from the Supreme Court?

Why would it be?

I have pointed it out again- San Francisco started planning for a possible World Series win weeks before the series started.

Yes- even before the first pitch was thrown in the World Series, San Francisco had on how to handle the celebrations- including lighting up City Hall with Giants colors.

To Silhouette this would mean there was a Konspiracy(probably involving gays and Harvey Milk), but to anyone else it just means prior planning

 

[Syriusly]

All that means is that this conspiracy goes all the way back to 2008. BEFORE Obama was president. So not only did they know in advance of the 2015 Supreme Court ruling in 2008, they knew Obama was going to be sitting in the White House when it happened. This before the election!

The entire system is rigged! Where's my fainting couch?!

It isn't a conspiracy theory to notice that within hours of the Supreme Court Ruling, a perfectly adjusted/tested rainbow light display blazes across the Whitehouse in a massive "fuck you" to the majority and the governed who lost their voice in the crucial debate of "should we make an institution out of fatherless or motherless marriages where children are the main focus?".

I know it was there and set up the day before. The Whitehouse logs are available to the public, no?

What "majority?" Most people agree with the Supreme Court decision.

You forget the other hopelessly batshit conspiracy theories that clutter Sil's worldview: that Gallup and every other polling agency that shows majority support for same sex marriage has been 'infiltrated by homosexuals' and is offering false polling data.

For Sil, its a conspiracy based on a conspiracy based on a conspiracy ad infinitum. The rhetorical equivalent of 'turtles all the way down'.

Wait- wait- you forget that Silhouette also believes that Gays forced last the Pope to retire!

Because well- you know he retired.

 

[Syriusly]

All that means is that this conspiracy goes all the way back to 2008. BEFORE Obama was president. So not only did they know in advance of the 2015 Supreme Court ruling in 2008, they knew Obama was going to be sitting in the White House when it happened. This before the election!

The entire system is rigged! Where's my fainting couch?!

e. The Whitehouse logs are available to the public, no?

Feel free to find out- though it would be a first for you to actually make the effort to check the facts before making your batshit crazy claims.

 

[ChrisL]

What "majority?" Most people agree with the Supreme Court decision.

Justice Scalia doesn't:

Justice Antonin Scalia is chastising the Supreme Court’s landmark decision legalizing same-sex marriage on Friday as an affront to the principle of democratic rule...Scalia argues in his opinion that the court is increasingly creating policy rather than serving as a neutral arbiter...“Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court,” he writes...“This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves.”.. ..But he wrote that he views the opinion as an overreach by the court, and chides the justices as “hardly a cross-section of America.”..He notes that all the justices graduated from Harvard or Yale Law School, eight grew up on the coasts, and that not one is an evangelical Christian or a Protestant, religions that make up significant chunks of the American population. ..“To allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation,” he writes.

Faun, would it be a problem for you from a Constitutional separation of powers viewpoint to learn that the rainbow lights were set up and tested at the Whitehouse before the Ruling came down from the Supreme Court?

Why would it be?

I have pointed it out again- San Francisco started planning for a possible World Series win weeks before the series started.

Yes- even before the first pitch was thrown in the World Series, San Francisco had on how to handle the celebrations- including lighting up City Hall with Giants colors.

To Silhouette this would mean there was a Konspiracy(probably involving gays and Harvey Milk), but to anyone else it just means prior planning

Because you KNOW you are carrying Harvey Milk stamps around with you!!! You are just another part of the evil Konspiracy to take over the world!

 

[Silhouette]

Might I suggest that any criminal investigation into this matter include interviewing the following poster?
]

You suggest all sorts of Konspiracy Krap.

No one is stopping you.

We have

1. Two US Supreme Court Justices who were performing gay marriages while the question of "should the fed preside over all 50 states, approving gay marriage without states' consent?" was pending. There is now serious talk of impeaching them and retrying the case. If there ever was a case for impeaching a Justice, Ginsburg and Kagan have made that case for Congress.

2. A Whitehouse rainbow light display, perfectly aligned and tested, fully lit just hours after the Ruling saying "the fed is forcing all 50 states to recognize gay marriages".

3. A blogger named "Skylar" (the same one who was bragging how orphanages should have their funding cut off if they refuse to adopt out to gay men or women coming to get little boys or little girls to bring home) saying he knew exactly how the Ruling was going to come down, months in advance of it even being Heard, down to the exact case laws they'd cite and who would author the Opinion. Which is pretty creepy if you think about it.

Put all three of them together and you have what on its face appears to be treachery and contempt for the US Constitution, its bylaws, the description of the separation of powers and the required decorum for both the SCOTUS and the POTUS. In other words you have a group of people who just a hundred years or so ago would've been wearing braided rope neckties.

 

[Syriusly]

Might I suggest that any criminal investigation into this matter include interviewing the following poster?
]

You suggest all sorts of Konspiracy Krap.

No one is stopping you.

We have

1. Two US Supreme Court Justices who were performing gay marriages while the question of "should the fed preside over all 50 states, approving gay marriage without states' consent?" was pending. There is now serious talk of impeaching them and retrying the case..

Two Justices performed legal marriages where there was no question of their legality.

There is no 'serious' talk of impeaching them- and there is no 'do-overs'.

The case has been decided and your melt down continues.

 

[Syriusly]

Might I suggest that any criminal investigation into this matter include interviewing the following poster?
]

You suggest all sorts of Konspiracy Krap.

No one is stopping you.

2. A Whitehouse rainbow light display, perfectly aligned and tested, fully lit just hours after the Ruling saying "the fed is forcing all 50 states to recognize gay marriages"..

There is no ruling that says the fed is forcing all 50 states to recognize gay marriage. The Supreme Court recognized that Americans have the right to marry, regardless of the gender of their spouse.

And yes- the Whitehouse had lights- which you take to be part of some vast Gay Konspiracy.

Because you are a loon.

 

[Syriusly]

Might I suggest that any criminal investigation into this matter include interviewing the following poster?
]

You suggest all sorts of Konspiracy Krap.

No one is stopping you.

3. A blogger named "Skylar" (the same one who was bragging how orphanages should have their funding cut off if they refuse to adopt out to gay men or women coming to get little boys or little girls to bring home) saying he knew exactly how the Ruling was going to come down, months in advance of it even being Heard, down to the exact case laws they'd cite and who would author the Opinion. Which is pretty creepy if you think about it..

A blogger named Silhouette told us she knew exactly how the Ruling was going to come down- months in advance.

She of course was pulling all of her reasoning out of her ass, and of course the Court didn't do any of what she predicted- so when someone actually correctly interprets the law- she presumes it is 'creepy'.

 

[Syriusly]

Might I suggest that any criminal investigation into this matter include interviewing the following poster?
]

You suggest all sorts of Konspiracy Krap.

No one is stopping you.

Put all three of them together and you have what on its face appears to be treachery and contempt for the US Constitution,.

Once again- Silhouette demonstrates that when she hears hoofbeats- she assumes that it must be gay unicorns attempting to molest little boys rather than horses.

 

[koshergrl]

The whole world knows who the loons are. And it isn't the people who are disgusted by the queer president or the minority of homonazis he's set against the majority.

 

[Skylar]

Might I suggest that any criminal investigation into this matter include interviewing the following poster?
]

You suggest all sorts of Konspiracy Krap.

No one is stopping you.

3. A blogger named "Skylar" (the same one who was bragging how orphanages should have their funding cut off if they refuse to adopt out to gay men or women coming to get little boys or little girls to bring home) saying he knew exactly how the Ruling was going to come down, months in advance of it even being Heard, down to the exact case laws they'd cite and who would author the Opinion. Which is pretty creepy if you think about it..

A blogger named Silhouette told us she knew exactly how the Ruling was going to come down- months in advance.

She of course was pulling all of her reasoning out of her ass, and of course the Court didn't do any of what she predicted- so when someone actually correctly interprets the law- she presumes it is 'creepy'.

In the wasteland of cognitive dissonance, being completely wrong is actually a virtue. As it demonstrates that you had no foreknowledge.

And that you didn't have the slightest clue what you were talking about.

 

[Skylar]

The whole world knows who the loons are. And it isn't the people who are disgusted by the queer president or the minority of homonazis he's set against the majority.

Huh. I wasn't aware that 37% was the 'majority'.

I could have sworn that 60% was though.

 

[Montrovant]

Might I suggest that any criminal investigation into this matter include interviewing the following poster?
]

You suggest all sorts of Konspiracy Krap.

No one is stopping you.

We have

1. Two US Supreme Court Justices who were performing gay marriages while the question of "should the fed preside over all 50 states, approving gay marriage without states' consent?" was pending. There is now serious talk of impeaching them and retrying the case. If there ever was a case for impeaching a Justice, Ginsburg and Kagan have made that case for Congress.

2. A Whitehouse rainbow light display, perfectly aligned and tested, fully lit just hours after the Ruling saying "the fed is forcing all 50 states to recognize gay marriages".

3. A blogger named "Skylar" (the same one who was bragging how orphanages should have their funding cut off if they refuse to adopt out to gay men or women coming to get little boys or little girls to bring home) saying he knew exactly how the Ruling was going to come down, months in advance of it even being Heard, down to the exact case laws they'd cite and who would author the Opinion. Which is pretty creepy if you think about it.

Put all three of them together and you have what on its face appears to be treachery and contempt for the US Constitution, its bylaws, the description of the separation of powers and the required decorum for both the SCOTUS and the POTUS. In other words you have a group of people who just a hundred years or so ago would've been wearing braided rope neckties.

This is the best post you have ever done! OMG!





Skylar is the secret master behind the gay conspiracy in this country! Thank you for ferreting his true identity out, Sil!

 

[koshergrl]

Might I suggest that any criminal investigation into this matter include interviewing the following poster?
]

You suggest all sorts of Konspiracy Krap.

No one is stopping you.

We have

1. Two US Supreme Court Justices who were performing gay marriages while the question of "should the fed preside over all 50 states, approving gay marriage without states' consent?" was pending. There is now serious talk of impeaching them and retrying the case. If there ever was a case for impeaching a Justice, Ginsburg and Kagan have made that case for Congress.

2. A Whitehouse rainbow light display, perfectly aligned and tested, fully lit just hours after the Ruling saying "the fed is forcing all 50 states to recognize gay marriages".

3. A blogger named "Skylar" (the same one who was bragging how orphanages should have their funding cut off if they refuse to adopt out to gay men or women coming to get little boys or little girls to bring home) saying he knew exactly how the Ruling was going to come down, months in advance of it even being Heard, down to the exact case laws they'd cite and who would author the Opinion. Which is pretty creepy if you think about it.

Put all three of them together and you have what on its face appears to be treachery and contempt for the US Constitution, its bylaws, the description of the separation of powers and the required decorum for both the SCOTUS and the POTUS. In other words you have a group of people who just a hundred years or so ago would've been wearing braided rope neckties.

This is the best post you have ever done! OMG!





Skylar is the secret master behind the gay conspiracy in this country! Thank you for ferreting his true identity out, Sil!

Must you queers ALWAYS screech?

 

[guno]

The whole world knows who the loons are. And it isn't the people who are disgusted by the queer president or the minority of homonazis he's set against the majority.

Still in the anger phase of your grieving