That damn right wing leaning supreme Court is ruling liberal again

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Kavanaugh and gorsuch should be impeached pronto!!!!!! How dare they go against big companies ...


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost - Los Angeles Times


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost

• POLITICS

Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost
By DAVID G. SAVAGE
OCT 15, 2018 | 7:25 AM
WASHINGTON

This file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Karen Bleier / AFP/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a closely watched big-business challenge to a California court ruling that requires former makers of lead paint to pay $400 million or more to clean up old homes.

Business lawyers said they feared the California ruling based on the “public nuisance” doctrine will give a green light to other suits seeking to hold manufacturers liable for damage inflicted on the public, including the opioid crisis and climate change.


The ruling in the lead paint case arose when 10 California local governments, including Los Angeles County, brought a “public nuisance” suit against the companies that once sold lead paint. They argued that lead is a proven toxin that can cause brain damage to children and that companies that once sold this paint should pay now for the cleanup, even though lead paint was legal and commonly used prior to the 1960s.

So that's what's wrong with you! Been eating lead paint chips!!!

 

[Marion Morrison]

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

It was also common practice to expos e children to tobacco smoke until we learned better. I would not be surprised if lead paint was also known to be harmful and that it was concealed from the public .

If it was up to you, children would get exposed to faggotry at ages when sexuality should not even be a thing. You don't even want to let children be children.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

It was also common practice to expos e children to tobacco smoke until we learned better. I would not be surprised if lead paint was also known to be harmful and that it was concealed from the public .

If it was up to you, children would get exposed to faggotry at ages when sexuality should not even be a thing. You don't even want to let children be children.

Get your mind out of the gutter and leave the children alone. You are a sexually obsessed jackass

 

[Marion Morrison]

Kavanaugh and gorsuch should be impeached pronto!!!!!! How dare they go against big companies ...


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost - Los Angeles Times


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost

• POLITICS

Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost
By DAVID G. SAVAGE
OCT 15, 2018 | 7:25 AM
WASHINGTON

This file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Karen Bleier / AFP/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a closely watched big-business challenge to a California court ruling that requires former makers of lead paint to pay $400 million or more to clean up old homes.

Business lawyers said they feared the California ruling based on the “public nuisance” doctrine will give a green light to other suits seeking to hold manufacturers liable for damage inflicted on the public, including the opioid crisis and climate change.


The ruling in the lead paint case arose when 10 California local governments, including Los Angeles County, brought a “public nuisance” suit against the companies that once sold lead paint. They argued that lead is a proven toxin that can cause brain damage to children and that companies that once sold this paint should pay now for the cleanup, even though lead paint was legal and commonly used prior to the 1960s.

Ssssss--they think they got CONSERVATIVE justices out of Niel Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh-- Trump and every GOP candidate during the 2016 election PROMISED them that. After all, you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked.

Well she might have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh, as she voted to confirm both of them to the District Court of Appeals, under G.W.Bush in 2006. A time when Democrats were the Senate majority and could have easily rejected them, as they had done with so many of G.W's nominees, these two came through that gaunlet with flying colors.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe v Wade was precedent in the Constitution meaning, set in stone.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Well.. look at that! I was right. Ted Cruz next or GFY.

Ted Cruz is up for what?

Supreme Court Justice. Duh!

Ted Cruz would never get close to the SCOTUS. Most of our Supreme Court Justices are coming out of the District Court of Appeals.

For more information on Ted Cruz click here to redirect.
Ted Cruz--would you still vote for him?

Quoted for when he's confirmed, dipshit.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

It was also common practice to expos e children to tobacco smoke until we learned better. I would not be surprised if lead paint was also known to be harmful and that it was concealed from the public .

If it was up to you, children would get exposed to faggotry at ages when sexuality should not even be a thing. You don't even want to let children be children.

Get your mind out of the gutter and leave the children alone. You are a sexually obsessed jackass

Not at all, you are. Here's some of your "fabulous" OPs.

The 1st proves my point, pederast. Prick.

I say Jefferson did bad by stopping the hanging of those like you. Now you're all emboldened.

The Religious Right Takes on UN Children’s Agency Over Sex Education

Britney Spears's 'Sodomy' Perfume Sparks Call for Boycott

 

[buckeye45_73]

I guess they dupes believe The Supremes are brainwashed shitheads now.... LOL

LOL, no he was sarcastic...and caught dupes like you.........hilarious.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Kavanaugh and gorsuch should be impeached pronto!!!!!! How dare they go against big companies ...


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost - Los Angeles Times


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost

• POLITICS

Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost
By DAVID G. SAVAGE
OCT 15, 2018 | 7:25 AM
WASHINGTON

This file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Karen Bleier / AFP/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a closely watched big-business challenge to a California court ruling that requires former makers of lead paint to pay $400 million or more to clean up old homes.

Business lawyers said they feared the California ruling based on the “public nuisance” doctrine will give a green light to other suits seeking to hold manufacturers liable for damage inflicted on the public, including the opioid crisis and climate change.


The ruling in the lead paint case arose when 10 California local governments, including Los Angeles County, brought a “public nuisance” suit against the companies that once sold lead paint. They argued that lead is a proven toxin that can cause brain damage to children and that companies that once sold this paint should pay now for the cleanup, even though lead paint was legal and commonly used prior to the 1960s.

Big Pharma SHOULD be held liable for the opiod crisis.

No doctors that give it away like candy should...there is a reason they require prescriptions.

 

[Timmy]

Kavanaugh and gorsuch should be impeached pronto!!!!!! How dare they go against big companies ...


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost - Los Angeles Times


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost

• POLITICS

Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost
By DAVID G. SAVAGE
OCT 15, 2018 | 7:25 AM
WASHINGTON

This file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Karen Bleier / AFP/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a closely watched big-business challenge to a California court ruling that requires former makers of lead paint to pay $400 million or more to clean up old homes.

Business lawyers said they feared the California ruling based on the “public nuisance” doctrine will give a green light to other suits seeking to hold manufacturers liable for damage inflicted on the public, including the opioid crisis and climate change.


The ruling in the lead paint case arose when 10 California local governments, including Los Angeles County, brought a “public nuisance” suit against the companies that once sold lead paint. They argued that lead is a proven toxin that can cause brain damage to children and that companies that once sold this paint should pay now for the cleanup, even though lead paint was legal and commonly used prior to the 1960s.

Big Pharma SHOULD be held liable for the opiod crisis.

The have . But they settled for a fraction of what they actually made. Should be brought up on criminal charges .

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Witches are planning to put a hex on Brett Kavanaugh

Hold on now witches....after this vote, we might want to give him a chance

 

[g5000]

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

They knew the toxic hazards of lead paint at the time, and chose to ignore them.

So much for "the invisible hand" making regulations unnecessary!

 

[oreo]

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

It was also common practice to expos e children to tobacco smoke until we learned better. I would not be surprised if lead paint was also known to be harmful and that it was concealed from the public .

It was concealed for years. We had babies teething on their cribs with lead paint.

 

[Oddball]

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

It was also common practice to expos e children to tobacco smoke until we learned better. I would not be surprised if lead paint was also known to be harmful and that it was concealed from the public .

Great moments in non-sequitur.

 

[Oddball]

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

They knew the toxic hazards of lead paint at the time, and chose to ignore them.

So much for "the invisible hand" making regulations unnecessary!

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

It was also common practice to expos e children to tobacco smoke until we learned better. I would not be surprised if lead paint was also known to be harmful and that it was concealed from the public .

It was concealed for years. We had babies teething on their cribs with lead paint.

It was fucking paint, not breakfast cereal.

 

[oreo]

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

They knew the toxic hazards of lead paint at the time, and chose to ignore them.

So much for "the invisible hand" making regulations unnecessary!

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

It was also common practice to expos e children to tobacco smoke until we learned better. I would not be surprised if lead paint was also known to be harmful and that it was concealed from the public .

It was concealed for years. We had babies teething on their cribs with lead paint.

It was fucking paint, not breakfast cereal.

A teething baby will chew on everything and anything.

 

[Oddball]

A teething baby will chew on everything and anything.

And so begins the adult-proofing of the entire world...Now you schmucks want to encase the cheeeelllrenn in bubble wrap.

 

[Wyatt earp]

The left does not care about the law only political ideology...perfect example my OP and this link.




Liberal profs launch campaign to pack Supreme Court after Kavanaugh confirmation
Liberal profs launch campaign to pack Supreme Court after Kavanaugh confirmation | Fox News

Less than a month after the confirmation of Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh entrenched a 5-4 conservative majority on the Supreme Court, leading law professors are urging Democrats to expand the size of all of the nation's federal courts and pack them with liberals.

Far-left Harvard professors Mark Tushnet and Laurence Tribe are lending their support to the so-called "1.20.21 Project," which was launched by political science professor Aaron Belkin on Wednesday to counter "Republican obstruction, theft and procedural abuse" of the federal judiciary.

That rhetoric reflects the professors' apparent surprise after the Democrats lost the 2016 presidential election, which they had hoped would allow the party to continue appointing liberal judges and justices. In 2016, when Hillary Clinton was leading in all major polls in her bid for the presidency, Tushnet definitively declared in a blog post that conservatives were the "losers in the culture wars."

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Kavanaugh and gorsuch should be impeached pronto!!!!!! How dare they go against big companies ...


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost - Los Angeles Times


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost

• POLITICS

Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost
By DAVID G. SAVAGE
OCT 15, 2018 | 7:25 AM
WASHINGTON

This file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Karen Bleier / AFP/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a closely watched big-business challenge to a California court ruling that requires former makers of lead paint to pay $400 million or more to clean up old homes.

Business lawyers said they feared the California ruling based on the “public nuisance” doctrine will give a green light to other suits seeking to hold manufacturers liable for damage inflicted on the public, including the opioid crisis and climate change.


The ruling in the lead paint case arose when 10 California local governments, including Los Angeles County, brought a “public nuisance” suit against the companies that once sold lead paint. They argued that lead is a proven toxin that can cause brain damage to children and that companies that once sold this paint should pay now for the cleanup, even though lead paint was legal and commonly used prior to the 1960s.

Big Pharma SHOULD be held liable for the opiod crisis.

Not a fan of personal responsibility I see.

 

[ptbw forever]

The court is going to rule against Harvard's affirmative action program though.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

They knew lead was a poison, which makes them culpable. I remember a heated conversation I had with one of my girl friends' father in 1970 or 71; he was a chemist in a company which manufactured leaded paint.

CA banned leaded paint in 1978.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

That may well sum it up. People sue each other over hurt feelings now.

Ridiculous where we are