That damn right wing leaning supreme Court is ruling liberal again

[Marion Morrison]

Kavanaugh and gorsuch should be impeached pronto!!!!!! How dare they go against big companies ...


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost - Los Angeles Times


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost

• POLITICS

Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost
By DAVID G. SAVAGE
OCT 15, 2018 | 7:25 AM
WASHINGTON

This file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Karen Bleier / AFP/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a closely watched big-business challenge to a California court ruling that requires former makers of lead paint to pay $400 million or more to clean up old homes.

Business lawyers said they feared the California ruling based on the “public nuisance” doctrine will give a green light to other suits seeking to hold manufacturers liable for damage inflicted on the public, including the opioid crisis and climate change.


The ruling in the lead paint case arose when 10 California local governments, including Los Angeles County, brought a “public nuisance” suit against the companies that once sold lead paint. They argued that lead is a proven toxin that can cause brain damage to children and that companies that once sold this paint should pay now for the cleanup, even though lead paint was legal and commonly used prior to the 1960s.

Ssssss--they think they got CONSERVATIVE justices out of Niel Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh-- Trump and every GOP candidate during the 2016 election PROMISED them that. After all, you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked.

Well she might have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh, as she voted to confirm both of them to the District Court of Appeals, under G.W.Bush in 2006. A time when Democrats were the Senate majority and could have easily rejected them, as they had done with so many of G.W's nominees, these two came through that gaunlet with flying colors.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe v Wade was precedent in the Constitution meaning, set in stone.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Well.. look at that! I was right. Ted Cruz next or GFY.

 

[oreo]

Kavanaugh and gorsuch should be impeached pronto!!!!!! How dare they go against big companies ...


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost - Los Angeles Times


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost

• POLITICS

Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost
By DAVID G. SAVAGE
OCT 15, 2018 | 7:25 AM
WASHINGTON

This file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Karen Bleier / AFP/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a closely watched big-business challenge to a California court ruling that requires former makers of lead paint to pay $400 million or more to clean up old homes.

Business lawyers said they feared the California ruling based on the “public nuisance” doctrine will give a green light to other suits seeking to hold manufacturers liable for damage inflicted on the public, including the opioid crisis and climate change.


The ruling in the lead paint case arose when 10 California local governments, including Los Angeles County, brought a “public nuisance” suit against the companies that once sold lead paint. They argued that lead is a proven toxin that can cause brain damage to children and that companies that once sold this paint should pay now for the cleanup, even though lead paint was legal and commonly used prior to the 1960s.

Ssssss--they think they got CONSERVATIVE justices out of Niel Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh-- Trump and every GOP candidate during the 2016 election PROMISED them that. After all, you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked.

Well she might have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh, as she voted to confirm both of them to the District Court of Appeals, under G.W.Bush in 2006. A time when Democrats were the Senate majority and could have easily rejected them, as they had done with so many of G.W's nominees, these two came through that gaunlet with flying colors.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe v Wade was precedent in the Constitution meaning, set in stone.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Well.. look at that! I was right. Ted Cruz next or GFY.

Ted Cruz is up for what?

 

[Marion Morrison]

Kavanaugh and gorsuch should be impeached pronto!!!!!! How dare they go against big companies ...


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost - Los Angeles Times


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost

• POLITICS

Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost
By DAVID G. SAVAGE
OCT 15, 2018 | 7:25 AM
WASHINGTON

This file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Karen Bleier / AFP/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a closely watched big-business challenge to a California court ruling that requires former makers of lead paint to pay $400 million or more to clean up old homes.

Business lawyers said they feared the California ruling based on the “public nuisance” doctrine will give a green light to other suits seeking to hold manufacturers liable for damage inflicted on the public, including the opioid crisis and climate change.


The ruling in the lead paint case arose when 10 California local governments, including Los Angeles County, brought a “public nuisance” suit against the companies that once sold lead paint. They argued that lead is a proven toxin that can cause brain damage to children and that companies that once sold this paint should pay now for the cleanup, even though lead paint was legal and commonly used prior to the 1960s.

Ssssss--they think they got CONSERVATIVE justices out of Niel Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh-- Trump and every GOP candidate during the 2016 election PROMISED them that. After all, you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked.

Well she might have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh, as she voted to confirm both of them to the District Court of Appeals, under G.W.Bush in 2006. A time when Democrats were the Senate majority and could have easily rejected them, as they had done with so many of G.W's nominees, these two came through that gaunlet with flying colors.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe v Wade was precedent in the Constitution meaning, set in stone.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Well.. look at that! I was right. Ted Cruz next or GFY.

Ted Cruz is up for what?

Supreme Court Justice. Duh!

 

[oreo]

Kavanaugh and gorsuch should be impeached pronto!!!!!! How dare they go against big companies ...


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost - Los Angeles Times


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost

• POLITICS

Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost
By DAVID G. SAVAGE
OCT 15, 2018 | 7:25 AM
WASHINGTON

This file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Karen Bleier / AFP/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a closely watched big-business challenge to a California court ruling that requires former makers of lead paint to pay $400 million or more to clean up old homes.

Business lawyers said they feared the California ruling based on the “public nuisance” doctrine will give a green light to other suits seeking to hold manufacturers liable for damage inflicted on the public, including the opioid crisis and climate change.


The ruling in the lead paint case arose when 10 California local governments, including Los Angeles County, brought a “public nuisance” suit against the companies that once sold lead paint. They argued that lead is a proven toxin that can cause brain damage to children and that companies that once sold this paint should pay now for the cleanup, even though lead paint was legal and commonly used prior to the 1960s.

Ssssss--they think they got CONSERVATIVE justices out of Niel Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh-- Trump and every GOP candidate during the 2016 election PROMISED them that. After all, you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked.

Well she might have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh, as she voted to confirm both of them to the District Court of Appeals, under G.W.Bush in 2006. A time when Democrats were the Senate majority and could have easily rejected them, as they had done with so many of G.W's nominees, these two came through that gaunlet with flying colors.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe v Wade was precedent in the Constitution meaning, set in stone.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Well.. look at that! I was right. Ted Cruz next or GFY.

Ted Cruz is up for what?

Supreme Court Justice. Duh!

Ted Cruz would never get close to the SCOTUS. Most of our Supreme Court Justices are coming out of the District Court of Appeals.

For more information on Ted Cruz click here to redirect.
Ted Cruz--would you still vote for him?

 

[Marion Morrison]

Ted Cruz would never get close to the SCOTUS. Most of our Supreme Court Justices are coming out of the District Court of Appeals.

For more information on Ted Cruz click here to redirect.
Ted Cruz--would you still vote for him?

You're a nimrod shill anyways. I don't take you seriously, ever!

 

[francoHFW]

I guess they dupes believe The Supremes are brainwashed shitheads now.... LOL

Your the one that's promoting it on wanting to impeach kavanaugh.


.

I say: "like he isn't going to vote just like Kennedy." He is.

Neveryoumind all the vile leftist hoopla.

You don't see me celebrating his confirmation, I have my reasons.

Ted Cruz should be nominated next. I can just see him with that robe on.

There are enough conservatives, we need a smart one now LOL

 

[Marion Morrison]

I guess they dupes believe The Supremes are brainwashed shitheads now.... LOL

Your the one that's promoting it on wanting to impeach kavanaugh.


.

I say: "like he isn't going to vote just like Kennedy." He is.

Neveryoumind all the vile leftist hoopla.

You don't see me celebrating his confirmation, I have my reasons.

Ted Cruz should be nominated next. I can just see him with that robe on.

There are enough conservatives, we need a smart one now LOL

Like your smartass? On The Supreme Court? No.

 

[oreo]

Do you actually believe that Republicans-- that have been attacked by Ted Cruz over the last several years, would ever consider him as a nominee to the U.S Supreme Court? Ted Cruz calling Mitch McConnell a liar on the Senate floor is somehow going to get him on the U.S. Supreme court, -let alone any Democrats who would approve of him
Why Senate Republicans hate Ted Cruz

It's time for you to find the other half of your brain.

 

[francoHFW]

I guess they dupes believe The Supremes are brainwashed shitheads now.... LOL

Your the one that's promoting it on wanting to impeach kavanaugh.


.

I say: "like he isn't going to vote just like Kennedy." He is.

Neveryoumind all the vile leftist hoopla.

You don't see me celebrating his confirmation, I have my reasons.

Ted Cruz should be nominated next. I can just see him with that robe on.

There are enough conservatives, we need a smart one now LOL

Like your smartass? On The Supreme Court? No.

I'm not the judge type thanks

 

[francoHFW]

I thought according to the liberal propaganda the right wing leaning supreme Court was going to destroy everything?

Sounds like CNN going for ratings and of course Fox is saying Democrats are all violence mobs now... Anything for ratings and to make money.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I thought according to the liberal propaganda the right wing leaning supreme Court was going to destroy everything?

Sounds like CNN going for ratings and of course Fox is saying Democrats are all violence mobs now... Anything for ratings and to make money.

I don't even watch cable, I read it on the liberal site you're a moderator at.

Liberal douche bag.com
.

 

[OKTexas]

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

So if it's "common practice" but is actually unethical, totally wrong etc, then it's okay?

Lead paint was banned 40 years ago except for very specific applications. It was most likely legal when it was applied, and now CA, like Dr Ford wants to cry foul decades later. Only in commiefornia.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Kavanaugh and gorsuch should be impeached pronto!!!!!! How dare they go against big companies ...


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost - Los Angeles Times


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost

• POLITICS

Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost
By DAVID G. SAVAGE
OCT 15, 2018 | 7:25 AM
WASHINGTON

This file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Karen Bleier / AFP/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a closely watched big-business challenge to a California court ruling that requires former makers of lead paint to pay $400 million or more to clean up old homes.

Business lawyers said they feared the California ruling based on the “public nuisance” doctrine will give a green light to other suits seeking to hold manufacturers liable for damage inflicted on the public, including the opioid crisis and climate change.


The ruling in the lead paint case arose when 10 California local governments, including Los Angeles County, brought a “public nuisance” suit against the companies that once sold lead paint. They argued that lead is a proven toxin that can cause brain damage to children and that companies that once sold this paint should pay now for the cleanup, even though lead paint was legal and commonly used prior to the 1960s.

Ssssss--they think they got CONSERVATIVE justices out of Niel Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh-- Trump and every GOP candidate during the 2016 election PROMISED them that. After all, you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked.

Well she might have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh, as she voted to confirm both of them to the District Court of Appeals, under G.W.Bush in 2006. A time when Democrats were the Senate majority and could have easily rejected them, as they had done with so many of G.W's nominees, these two came through that gaunlet with flying colors.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe v Wade was precedent in the Constitution meaning, set in stone.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Well.. look at that! I was right. Ted Cruz next or GFY.

Ted Cruz is up for what?

Supreme Court Justice. Duh!

Ted Cruz would never get close to the SCOTUS. Most of our Supreme Court Justices are coming out of the District Court of Appeals.

For more information on Ted Cruz click here to redirect.
Ted Cruz--would you still vote for him?

Still pushing that line? 52 of 114 that have served on the court have had no experience as a judge, probably less than half the remanding 62 came from the courts of appeal. When are you going to stop making crap up?

.

 

[Claudette]

Hope you aren't holding your breath. LOL

 

[Claudette]

Kavanaugh and gorsuch should be impeached pronto!!!!!! How dare they go against big companies ...


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost - Los Angeles Times


Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost

• POLITICS

Supreme Court lets stand California ruling holding lead paint makers liable for $400-million cleanup cost
By DAVID G. SAVAGE
OCT 15, 2018 | 7:25 AM
WASHINGTON

This file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Karen Bleier / AFP/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a closely watched big-business challenge to a California court ruling that requires former makers of lead paint to pay $400 million or more to clean up old homes.

Business lawyers said they feared the California ruling based on the “public nuisance” doctrine will give a green light to other suits seeking to hold manufacturers liable for damage inflicted on the public, including the opioid crisis and climate change.


The ruling in the lead paint case arose when 10 California local governments, including Los Angeles County, brought a “public nuisance” suit against the companies that once sold lead paint. They argued that lead is a proven toxin that can cause brain damage to children and that companies that once sold this paint should pay now for the cleanup, even though lead paint was legal and commonly used prior to the 1960s.

Big Pharma SHOULD be held liable for the opiod crisis.

No. People should be held liable for taking that shit. No one puts a gun to their head.

They do it because they get themselves hooked on it.

I couldn't care less if they all dropped the fuck dead.

 

[oreo]

Ssssss--they think they got CONSERVATIVE justices out of Niel Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh-- Trump and every GOP candidate during the 2016 election PROMISED them that. After all, you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked.

Well she might have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh, as she voted to confirm both of them to the District Court of Appeals, under G.W.Bush in 2006. A time when Democrats were the Senate majority and could have easily rejected them, as they had done with so many of G.W's nominees, these two came through that gaunlet with flying colors.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe v Wade was precedent in the Constitution meaning, set in stone.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Well.. look at that! I was right. Ted Cruz next or GFY.

Ted Cruz is up for what?

Supreme Court Justice. Duh!

Ted Cruz would never get close to the SCOTUS. Most of our Supreme Court Justices are coming out of the District Court of Appeals.

For more information on Ted Cruz click here to redirect.
Ted Cruz--would you still vote for him?

Still pushing that line? 52 of 114 that have served on the court have had no experience as a judge, probably less than half the remanding 62 came from the courts of appeal. When are you going to stop making crap up?

.

Anytime you want to provide a credible verifiable link to that feel free to do so.

 

[OKTexas]

Well.. look at that! I was right. Ted Cruz next or GFY.

Ted Cruz is up for what?

Supreme Court Justice. Duh!

Ted Cruz would never get close to the SCOTUS. Most of our Supreme Court Justices are coming out of the District Court of Appeals.

For more information on Ted Cruz click here to redirect.
Ted Cruz--would you still vote for him?

Still pushing that line? 52 of 114 that have served on the court have had no experience as a judge, probably less than half the remanding 62 came from the courts of appeal. When are you going to stop making crap up?

.

Anytime you want to provide a credible verifiable link to that feel free to do so.

You mean like the credible verifiable link you didn't provide? I provided the names that were never judges, feel free to check the individual bios of the other 62.

.

 

[oreo]

Ted Cruz is up for what?

Supreme Court Justice. Duh!

Ted Cruz would never get close to the SCOTUS. Most of our Supreme Court Justices are coming out of the District Court of Appeals.

For more information on Ted Cruz click here to redirect.
Ted Cruz--would you still vote for him?

Still pushing that line? 52 of 114 that have served on the court have had no experience as a judge, probably less than half the remanding 62 came from the courts of appeal. When are you going to stop making crap up?

.

Anytime you want to provide a credible verifiable link to that feel free to do so.

You mean like the credible verifiable link you didn't provide? I provided the names that were never judges, feel free to check the individual bios of the other 62.

.

meaning you still haven't found one.

What makes you think that Ted Cruz would ever be selected as a Supreme Court nominee--
Here's a credible verifiable link.
Why Senate Republicans hate Ted Cruz

 

[peach174]

S.C. pushed it back to the State as it should be, as a State issue ,not a federal issue.
It's up to the people in Calif. to make that decision by electing a legislature and Gov. that would repeal it or keep it.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Oh great....People who were doing what was common practice at the time, now being sued for no malicious intent on their part....'Murica!

It was also common practice to expos e children to tobacco smoke until we learned better. I would not be surprised if lead paint was also known to be harmful and that it was concealed from the public .