Thanks George, what do you do for an encore?

[red states rule]

Look at the Date of your CNN article Doofus: 2003

Hopelessly out of date, and debunked.

Why are you trying to pass off four year old lies?

The truth is ageless and gives libs a headache

 

[Larkinn]

To libs like you, Saddam was a harmless guy and misunderstoood by the world

To pussies like you, Saddam was going to invade the US and conquer us all.

 

[red states rule]

To pussies like you, Saddam was going to invade the US and conquer us all.

Pussies?

Look in the mirror. Libs have a long history of allowing evil to grow and fester

 

[Larkinn]

Pussies?

Look in the mirror. Libs have a long history of allowing evil to grow and fester

Actually, historically, it would have been the liberals who wanted to invade countries and save populations. Its always been the conservatives who have been more isolationist. But don't let the pesky facts get in the way of your asinine opinions rsr.

 

[red states rule]

Actually, historically, it would have been the liberals who wanted to invade countries and save populations. Its always been the conservatives who have been more isolationist. But don't let the pesky facts get in the way of your asinine opinions rsr.

The once proud party of FDR and Truman have put their party ahead of their country

For the last 30 years, Dems have rolled over and allowed evil to expand and grow

 

[maineman]

To libs like you, Saddam was a harmless guy and misunderstoood by the world

fuck you...I have never said any such thing. He was NOT a threat to us...our own secretary of state proclaimed that he was incapable of projecting power beyond his own borders....

off to the golf course.

 

[red states rule]

fuck you...I have never said any such thing. He was NOT a threat to us...our own secretary of state proclaimed that he was incapable of projecting power beyond his own borders....

off to the golf course.

Yea, he was only shooting at US aircraft everyday - I guess to you the pilots were provoking Saddam

 

[DeadCanDance]

The truth is ageless and gives libs a headache

Let me get this straight:

-You, anonymous poster RSR, is right about Al Qaeda in pre-war Iraq.

And….

-The Entire American Intelligence Community, and Bipartisan Senate Report, are wrong about it?:

*CIA/Senate Bipartisan Report on Iraq Intelligence, September 2006:

-Conclusion 5: "Postwar information indicates that Saddam Hussein attempted, unsuccessfully, to locate and capture al-Zarqawi and that the regime did not have a relationship with, harbor, or turn a blind eye toward Zarqawi"

-Conclusion 1: "Postwar findings indicate that Saddam Hussein was distrustful of al-Qa'ida and viewed Islamic extremists as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from al-Qa'ida to provide material or operational support."

-Conclusion 6: "Prewar interactions between Saddam Hussein's government and al-Qaeda affiliate group Ansar al-Islam were attempts by Saddam to spy on the group rather than to support or work with them.. "Postwar information reveals that Baghdad viewed Ansar al-Islam as a threat to the regime and that the IIS attempted to collect intelligence on the group."


http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiaccuracy.pdf

 

[Care4all]

For a Naval officer, your not to quick on the uptake when it comes to basic military strategy there are you there MM?

Do you think, that just maybe, we knew our invaision of Iraq would draw that as you called them " relatively NEW organization" (other wise known as Al- Queda) into the war so we could kill them (men that want to kill our children and destroy our way of life) on thier soil!!!!!

I dont care if they didnt affiliate themselves OBL till 2004 or not... they all must die!



Do ya think, maybe?

so you are saying that our president decided to put OUR SOLDIERS in to iraq as DECOYS for alqaeda to shoot at and kill 3600 plus of them, and Bush DID this on PURPOSE, as a plan, in retalliation of 911?

wow! That's an IMPEACHABLE offense if true, imo!

 

[red states rule]

so you are saying that our president decided to put OUR SOLDIERS in to iraq as DECOYS for alqaeda to shoot at and kill 3600 plus of them, and Bush DID this on PURPOSE, as a plan, in retalliation of 911?

wow! That's an IMPEACHABLE offense if true, imo!

Pres Bush put the troops in Iraq to kill the terorists

Libs want to surrender to them. To me, that is the impeachable offense

 

[red states rule]

Saddam's Terror Training Camps
What the documents captured from the former Iraqi regime reveal--and why they should all be made public.
by Stephen F. Hayes
01/16/2006, Volume 011, Issue 17

THE FORMER IRAQI REGIME OF Saddam Hussein trained thousands of radical Islamic terrorists from the region at camps in Iraq over the four years immediately preceding the U.S. invasion, according to documents and photographs recovered by the U.S. military in postwar Iraq. The existence and character of these documents has been confirmed to THE WEEKLY STANDARD by eleven U.S. government officials.

The secret training took place primarily at three camps--in Samarra, Ramadi, and Salman Pak--and was directed by elite Iraqi military units. Interviews by U.S. government interrogators with Iraqi regime officials and military leaders corroborate the documentary evidence. Many of the fighters were drawn from terrorist groups in northern Africa with close ties to al Qaeda, chief among them Algeria's GSPC and the Sudanese Islamic Army. Some 2,000 terrorists were trained at these Iraqi camps each year from 1999 to 2002, putting the total number at or above 8,000. Intelligence officials believe that some of these terrorists returned to Iraq and are responsible for attacks against Americans and Iraqis. According to three officials with knowledge of the intelligence on Iraqi training camps, White House and National Security Council officials were briefed on these findings in May 2005; senior Defense Department officials subsequently received the same briefing.

The photographs and documents on Iraqi training camps come from a collection of some 2 million "exploitable items" captured in postwar Iraq and Afghanistan. They include handwritten notes, typed documents, audiotapes, videotapes, compact discs, floppy discs, and computer hard drives. Taken together, this collection could give U.S.
intelligence officials and policymakers an inside look at the activities of the former Iraqi regime in the months and years before the Iraq war.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/550kmbzd.asp

 

[DeadCanDance]

-Some journalist named "Stephen Hayes" at some magazine called "The Weekly Standard"....

VERSUS

-The Entire American Intelligence Community, and a Bipartisan Senate Intelligence Report on Iraq from September 2006

"Saddam's Terror Training Camps"
What the documents captured from the former Iraqi regime reveal--and why they should all be made public.

by Stephen F. Hayes
01/16/2006

snip
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/550kmbzd.asp

VERSUS....

*CIA/Senate Bipartisan Report on Iraq Intelligence, September 2006:

-Conclusion 4: "Postwar findings support the April 2002 Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment that there was no credible reporting on al-Qa'ida training at Salman Pak or anywhere else in Iraq . There have been no credible reports since the war that Iraq trained al-Qa'ida operatives at Salman Pak to conduct or support transnational terrorist operations."

-Conclusion 5: Postwar information indicates that Saddam Hussein attempted, unsuccessfully, to locate and capture al-Zarqawi and that the regime did not have a relationship with, harbor, or turn a blind eye toward Zarqawi

-Conclusion 1: "Postwar findings indicate that Saddam Hussein was distrustful of al-Qa'ida and viewed Islamic extremists as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from al-Qa'ida to provide material or operational support."



http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiaccuracy.pdf

 

[red states rule]

Mr Hayes did give his evidence

Now to the left, the government is a credible source

 

[DeadCanDance]

-Uh, yeah some journalist practically no one's ever heard of ("Stephen Hayes") at some two-bit magazine few people have heard of, got it "RIGHT"

-And the entire American Intelligence Community, plus all the democrats and republicans on the bipartisan Senate intelligence report got it "WRONG"

 

[Larkinn]

Mr Hayes did give his evidence

Now to the left, the government is a credible source

tsk tsk...and now you are slurring America. When will your crimes ever cease, rsr?

 

[red states rule]

tsk tsk...and now you are slurring America. When will your crimes ever cease, rsr?

Libs have spent 7 years saying the Bush administration is a criminal empire - now when a "treport" says what they want to hear - they are credible

 

[Larkinn]

Libs have spent 7 years saying the Bush administration is a criminal empire - now when a "treport" says what they want to hear - they are credible

Tsk tsk, we were talking about you child, and your slurs on America. Really, why do you hate freedom so much?

 

[red states rule]

Tsk tsk, we were talking about you child, and your slurs on America. Really, why do you hate freedom so much?

a great example of the left showing their support for the troops

 

[maineman]

a great example of the left showing their support for the troops

how much bandwidth do you intend to waste by continually spamming the board with the same stupid photograph?

fucking troll.

 

[red states rule]

how much bandwidth do you intend to waste by continually spamming the board with the same stupid photograph?

fucking troll.

Just showing how the kook left shows there support for the troops.

Truth hurts eh, MM?