Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differently

[Billo_Really]

And not one of those resolutions on that list was valid, and came from a NAZI WHITE SUPREMACIST source. As pointed out not one of those violations was taken up by the nations bringing the offences to the un at the ICC/ICJ as they would have been found guilty themselves of wasting the courts time

Shut up, troll, it's past your bedtime.

 

[Kondor3]

Awwwwwww.... is itty-bitty Israel treated differently? Tsk... tsk... tsk... my... my... my... oh, dearie me...how unfair...

 

[Mindful]

Don't even attempt to try a normal conversation. Or anything resembling one.

Why? Because you have no intention of participating in one?

There isn't one. As far as you're concerned.

 

[Mindful]

Awwwwwww.... is itty-bitty Israel treated differently? Tsk... tsk... tsk... my... my... my... oh, dearie me...how unfair...

Is yours a case of arrested development?

 

[Phoenall]

And not one of those resolutions on that list was valid, and came from a NAZI WHITE SUPREMACIST source. As pointed out not one of those violations was taken up by the nations bringing the offences to the un at the ICC/ICJ as they would have been found guilty themselves of wasting the courts time

Shut up, troll, it's past your bedtime.

Your answer every time you are proven to be a moron is to stamp your feet, scream and act like a spoilt brat

 

[Linkiloo]

Israel is the only country that doesn't get away with anything.

Look at Assad, look at Putin, look at China or Saudia Arabia. They can murder political adversaries, take over countries, kill and maim civilians etc without anyone batting an eye-lid.

 

[Kondor3]

Awwwwwww.... is itty-bitty Israel treated differently? Tsk... tsk... tsk... my... my... my... oh, dearie me...how unfair...

Is yours a case of arrested development?

Golly-gosh gee-willickers, Emmy Lou... I don't think he/she/it liked my answer...

 

[Mindful]

Awwwwwww.... is itty-bitty Israel treated differently? Tsk... tsk... tsk... my... my... my... oh, dearie me...how unfair...

Is yours a case of arrested development?

Golly-gosh gee-willickers, Emmy Lou... I don't think he/she/it liked my answer...

You give answers? You're capable?

 

[Kondor3]

Awwwwwww.... is itty-bitty Israel treated differently? Tsk... tsk... tsk... my... my... my... oh, dearie me...how unfair...

Is yours a case of arrested development?

Golly-gosh gee-willickers, Emmy Lou... I don't think he/she/it liked my answer...

You give answers? You're capable?

Don't try being clever this early in the morning, snookums...

 

[Mindful]

Awwwwwww.... is itty-bitty Israel treated differently? Tsk... tsk... tsk... my... my... my... oh, dearie me...how unfair...

Is yours a case of arrested development?

Golly-gosh gee-willickers, Emmy Lou... I don't think he/she/it liked my answer...

You give answers? You're capable?

Don't try being clever this early in the morning, snookums...

Morning? What morning?

 

[Picaro]

None. Next ...

None what? Care to explain WTF you're talking about?

Forget your own posts already? I gave you a direct and accurate answer to your question. You refuse to, as usual.

Yes, you're embarrassed by the answer, so avoid it. Typical of those who have no real principles and have no qualms about distorting the facts.

I didn't avoid that answer. I made the point your statement was moot.[/quote]

Oh, of course you did

Yet nobody has brought any of these alleged 'violations' to the ICJ; that's because they're nonsense, and even a kangaroo Court won't touch them. It's just a load of drivel put out by sociopaths that cretins like yourself get woodies over repeating over and over.

Ah, the little kiss-ass troll, is trying to change the subject.[/quote]

You tards keep posting gibberish about alledged 'violations'. So come up with some already, real ones, instead of just blathering nonsense. If there are all these 'violations' then just show us the ICJ cases where they've been found guilty. According to you, there are supposed to be zillions.

lol you didn't read even a single one of those, or you wouldn't be citing them as examples. Typical retarded bigot just cut and pasting from some propaganda site, too stupid to fact check even simple posts, so obviously 'shit bitch' is just projection on your part.

How the fuck would you know what I've read? You claimed the Pals were breaking international law, but couldn't cite one law to back up your claim. Whereas I posted a whole slew of resolutions Israel was in violation of and you don't even have the balls to comment on them.[/QUOTE]

You posted what?

Tell the truth now, lil Billy: Do you believe the Israelis are in charge of the UN flagpole?

 

[montelatici]

None. Next ...

None what? Care to explain WTF you're talking about?

Forget your own posts already? I gave you a direct and accurate answer to your question. You refuse to, as usual.

Yes, you're embarrassed by the answer, so avoid it. Typical of those who have no real principles and have no qualms about distorting the facts.

I didn't avoid that answer. I made the point your statement was moot.

Oh, of course you did

Yet nobody has brought any of these alleged 'violations' to the ICJ; that's because they're nonsense, and even a kangaroo Court won't touch them. It's just a load of drivel put out by sociopaths that cretins like yourself get woodies over repeating over and over.

Ah, the little kiss-ass troll, is trying to change the subject.[/quote]

You tards keep posting gibberish about alledged 'violations'. So come up with some already, real ones, instead of just blathering nonsense. If there are all these 'violations' then just show us the ICJ cases where they've been found guilty. According to you, there are supposed to be zillions.

lol you didn't read even a single one of those, or you wouldn't be citing them as examples. Typical retarded bigot just cut and pasting from some propaganda site, too stupid to fact check even simple posts, so obviously 'shit bitch' is just projection on your part.

How the fuck would you know what I've read? You claimed the Pals were breaking international law, but couldn't cite one law to back up your claim. Whereas I posted a whole slew of resolutions Israel was in violation of and you don't even have the balls to comment on them.[/QUOTE]

You posted what?

Tell the truth now, lil Billy: Do you believe the Israelis are in charge of the UN flagpole?[/QUOTE]

Some of the earlier UN resolutions regarding Israel are listed in an admittedly pro-Palestine publication. However, such a list will would probably not be compiled in a pro-Israel source. On Wiki, with all the edits, I doubt it would be a reliable list. Each of these resolutions are available in the UN archives and can be checked out individually if anyone has any doubts as to the authenticity of the list.

Res. 57 (Sep. 18, 1948) – Expresses deep shock at the assassination of the U.N. Mediator in Palestine, Count Folke Bernadotte, by Zionist terrorists.

Res. 89 (Nov. 17, 1950) – Requests that attention be given to the expulsion of “thousands of Palestine Arabs” and calls upon concerned governments to take no further action “involving the transfer of persons across international frontiers or armistice lines”, and notes that Israel announced that it would withdraw to the armistice lines.

Res. 93 (May 18, 1951) – Finds that Israeli airstrikes on Syria on April 5, 1951 constitutes “a violation of the cease-fire”, and decides that Arab civilians expelled from the demilitarized zone by Israel should be allowed to return.

Res. 100 (Oct. 27, 1953) – Notes that Israel had said it would stop work it started in the demilitarized zone on September 2, 1953.

Res. 101 (Nov. 24, 1953) – Finds Israel’s attack on Qibya, Jordan on October 14-15, 1953 to be a violation of the cease-fire and “Expresses the strongest censure of that action”.

Res. 106 (Mar. 29, 1955) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Egyptian forces in the Gaza Strip on February 28, 1955.

Res. 111 (Jan. 19, 1956) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Syria on December 11, 1955 as “a flagrant violation of the cease-fire” and armistice agreement.

Res. 119 (Oct. 31, 1956) – Considers that “a grave situation has been created” by the attack against Egypt by the forces of Britain, France, and Israel.

Res. 171 (Apr. 9, 1962) – Reaffirms resolution 111 and determines that Israel’s attack on Syria on March 16-17, 1962 “constitutes a flagrant violation of that resolution”.

Res. 228 (Nov. 25, 1966) – “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property resulting from the action” by Israel in the southern Hebron area on November 13, 1966, and “Censures Israel for this large-scale military action in violation of the United Nations Charter” and the armistice agreement between Israel and Jordan.

Res. 237 (Jun. 14, 1967) – Calls on Israel “to ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants where military operations have taken place” during the war launched by Israel on June 5, 1967 “and to facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak of hostilities”.

Res. 242 (Nov. 22, 1967) – Emphasizes “the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”, emphasizes that member states have a commitment to abide by the U.N. Charter, and calls for the “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied” during the June 1967 war.

Res. 248 (Mar. 24, 1968) – Observes that the Israeli attack on Jordan “was of a large-scale and carefully planned nature”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, “Condemns the military action launched by Israel in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”, and “Calls upon Israel to desist from” further violations of resolution 237.

Res. 250 (Apr. 27, 1968) – Considers “that the holding of a military parade in Jerusalem will aggravate tensions in the area and have an adverse effect on a peaceful settlement of the problems in the area” and “Calls upon Israel to refrain from holding the military parade in Jerusalem which is contemplated” for May 2, 1968.

Res. 251 (May 2, 1968) – Recalls resolution 250 and “Deeply deplores the holding by Israel of the military parade in Jerusalem” on May 2, 1968 “in disregard of” resolution 250.

Res. 252 (May 21, 1968) – “Deplores the failure of Israel to comply with” General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, considers Israel’s annexation of Jerusalem “invalid”, and calls upon Israel “to rescind all such measures already taken and to desist forthwith from taking any further action which tends to change the status of Jerusalem”.

Res. 256 (Aug. 16, 1968) – Recalls Israel’s “flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter” condemned in resolution 248, observes that further Israeli air attacks on Jordan “were of a large scale and carefully planned nature in violation of resolution 248”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, and condemns Israel’s attacks.

Res. 259 (Sep. 27, 1968) – Expresses concern for “the safety, welfare and security” of the Palestinians “under military occupation by Israel”, deplores “the delay in the implementation of resolution 237 (1967) because of the conditions still being set by Israel for receiving a Special Representative of the Secretary-General”, and requests Israel to receive the Special Representative and facilitate his work.

Res. 262 (Dec. 31, 1968) – Observes “that the military action by the armed forces of Israel against the civil International Airport of Beirut was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned nature”, and condemns Israel for the attack.

Res.265 (Apr. 1, 1969) – Expresses “deep concern that the recent attacks on Jordanian villages and other populated areas were of a pre-planned nature, in violation of resolutions” 248 and 256, “Deplores the loss of civilian life and damage to property”, and “Condemns the recent premeditated air attacks launched by Israel on Jordanian villages and populated areas in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”.

Res. 267 (Jul. 3, 1969) – Recalls resolution 252 and General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, notes that “since the adoption of the above-mentioned resolutions Israel has taken further measures tending to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Deplores the failure of Israel to show any regard for the resolutions”, “Censures in the strongest terms all measures taken to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, “Confirms that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel which purport to alter the status of Jerusalem, including expropriation of land and properties thereon, are invalid and cannot change that status”, and urgently calls on Israel to rescind the measures taken to annex Jerusalem.

Res. 270 (Aug. 26, 1969) – “Condemns the premeditated air attack by Israel on villages in southern Lebanon in violation of its obligations under the Charter and Security Council resolutions”.

Res. 271 (Sep. 15, 1969) – Expresses grief “at the extensive damage caused by arson to the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem” on August 21, 1969 “under the military occupation of Israel”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Determines that the execrable act of desecration and profanation of the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque emphasizes the immediate necessity of Israel’s desisting from acting in violation” previous resolutions and rescinding measures to annex Jerusalem, calls on Israel “to observe the provisions of the Geneva Conventions and international law governing military occupation”, and condemns Israel’s failure to comply with previous resolutions.

Res. 279 (May 12, 1970) – “Demands the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Res. 280 (May 19, 1970) – Expresses conviction that “that the Israeli military attack against Lebanon was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned in nature”, recalls resolution 279 “demanding the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory”, deplores Israel’s violation of resolutions 262 and 270, “Condemns Israel for its premeditated military action in violation of its obligations under the Charter of the United Nations”, and “Deplores the loss of life and damage to property inflicted as a result” of Israeli violations of Security Council resolutions.

Res. 285 (Sep. 5, 1970) – “Demands the complete and immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Israeli Violations of U.N. Security Council Resolutions

 

[Phoenall]

None. Next ...

None what? Care to explain WTF you're talking about?

Forget your own posts already? I gave you a direct and accurate answer to your question. You refuse to, as usual.

Yes, you're embarrassed by the answer, so avoid it. Typical of those who have no real principles and have no qualms about distorting the facts.

I didn't avoid that answer. I made the point your statement was moot.

Oh, of course you did

Yet nobody has brought any of these alleged 'violations' to the ICJ; that's because they're nonsense, and even a kangaroo Court won't touch them. It's just a load of drivel put out by sociopaths that cretins like yourself get woodies over repeating over and over.

Ah, the little kiss-ass troll, is trying to change the subject.

You tards keep posting gibberish about alledged 'violations'. So come up with some already, real ones, instead of just blathering nonsense. If there are all these 'violations' then just show us the ICJ cases where they've been found guilty. According to you, there are supposed to be zillions.

lol you didn't read even a single one of those, or you wouldn't be citing them as examples. Typical retarded bigot just cut and pasting from some propaganda site, too stupid to fact check even simple posts, so obviously 'shit bitch' is just projection on your part.

How the fuck would you know what I've read? You claimed the Pals were breaking international law, but couldn't cite one law to back up your claim. Whereas I posted a whole slew of resolutions Israel was in violation of and you don't even have the balls to comment on them.[/QUOTE]

You posted what?

Tell the truth now, lil Billy: Do you believe the Israelis are in charge of the UN flagpole?[/QUOTE]

Some of the earlier UN resolutions regarding Israel are listed in an admittedly pro-Palestine publication. However, such a list will would probably not be compiled in a pro-Israel source. On Wiki, with all the edits, I doubt it would be a reliable list. Each of these resolutions are available in the UN archives and can be checked out individually if anyone has any doubts as to the authenticity of the list.

Res. 57 (Sep. 18, 1948) – Expresses deep shock at the assassination of the U.N. Mediator in Palestine, Count Folke Bernadotte, by Zionist terrorists.

Res. 89 (Nov. 17, 1950) – Requests that attention be given to the expulsion of “thousands of Palestine Arabs” and calls upon concerned governments to take no further action “involving the transfer of persons across international frontiers or armistice lines”, and notes that Israel announced that it would withdraw to the armistice lines.

Res. 93 (May 18, 1951) – Finds that Israeli airstrikes on Syria on April 5, 1951 constitutes “a violation of the cease-fire”, and decides that Arab civilians expelled from the demilitarized zone by Israel should be allowed to return.

Res. 100 (Oct. 27, 1953) – Notes that Israel had said it would stop work it started in the demilitarized zone on September 2, 1953.

Res. 101 (Nov. 24, 1953) – Finds Israel’s attack on Qibya, Jordan on October 14-15, 1953 to be a violation of the cease-fire and “Expresses the strongest censure of that action”.

Res. 106 (Mar. 29, 1955) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Egyptian forces in the Gaza Strip on February 28, 1955.

Res. 111 (Jan. 19, 1956) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Syria on December 11, 1955 as “a flagrant violation of the cease-fire” and armistice agreement.

Res. 119 (Oct. 31, 1956) – Considers that “a grave situation has been created” by the attack against Egypt by the forces of Britain, France, and Israel.

Res. 171 (Apr. 9, 1962) – Reaffirms resolution 111 and determines that Israel’s attack on Syria on March 16-17, 1962 “constitutes a flagrant violation of that resolution”.

Res. 228 (Nov. 25, 1966) – “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property resulting from the action” by Israel in the southern Hebron area on November 13, 1966, and “Censures Israel for this large-scale military action in violation of the United Nations Charter” and the armistice agreement between Israel and Jordan.

Res. 237 (Jun. 14, 1967) – Calls on Israel “to ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants where military operations have taken place” during the war launched by Israel on June 5, 1967 “and to facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak of hostilities”.

Res. 242 (Nov. 22, 1967) – Emphasizes “the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”, emphasizes that member states have a commitment to abide by the U.N. Charter, and calls for the “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied” during the June 1967 war.

Res. 248 (Mar. 24, 1968) – Observes that the Israeli attack on Jordan “was of a large-scale and carefully planned nature”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, “Condemns the military action launched by Israel in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”, and “Calls upon Israel to desist from” further violations of resolution 237.

Res. 250 (Apr. 27, 1968) – Considers “that the holding of a military parade in Jerusalem will aggravate tensions in the area and have an adverse effect on a peaceful settlement of the problems in the area” and “Calls upon Israel to refrain from holding the military parade in Jerusalem which is contemplated” for May 2, 1968.

Res. 251 (May 2, 1968) – Recalls resolution 250 and “Deeply deplores the holding by Israel of the military parade in Jerusalem” on May 2, 1968 “in disregard of” resolution 250.

Res. 252 (May 21, 1968) – “Deplores the failure of Israel to comply with” General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, considers Israel’s annexation of Jerusalem “invalid”, and calls upon Israel “to rescind all such measures already taken and to desist forthwith from taking any further action which tends to change the status of Jerusalem”.

Res. 256 (Aug. 16, 1968) – Recalls Israel’s “flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter” condemned in resolution 248, observes that further Israeli air attacks on Jordan “were of a large scale and carefully planned nature in violation of resolution 248”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, and condemns Israel’s attacks.

Res. 259 (Sep. 27, 1968) – Expresses concern for “the safety, welfare and security” of the Palestinians “under military occupation by Israel”, deplores “the delay in the implementation of resolution 237 (1967) because of the conditions still being set by Israel for receiving a Special Representative of the Secretary-General”, and requests Israel to receive the Special Representative and facilitate his work.

Res. 262 (Dec. 31, 1968) – Observes “that the military action by the armed forces of Israel against the civil International Airport of Beirut was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned nature”, and condemns Israel for the attack.

Res.265 (Apr. 1, 1969) – Expresses “deep concern that the recent attacks on Jordanian villages and other populated areas were of a pre-planned nature, in violation of resolutions” 248 and 256, “Deplores the loss of civilian life and damage to property”, and “Condemns the recent premeditated air attacks launched by Israel on Jordanian villages and populated areas in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”.

Res. 267 (Jul. 3, 1969) – Recalls resolution 252 and General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, notes that “since the adoption of the above-mentioned resolutions Israel has taken further measures tending to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Deplores the failure of Israel to show any regard for the resolutions”, “Censures in the strongest terms all measures taken to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, “Confirms that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel which purport to alter the status of Jerusalem, including expropriation of land and properties thereon, are invalid and cannot change that status”, and urgently calls on Israel to rescind the measures taken to annex Jerusalem.

Res. 270 (Aug. 26, 1969) – “Condemns the premeditated air attack by Israel on villages in southern Lebanon in violation of its obligations under the Charter and Security Council resolutions”.

Res. 271 (Sep. 15, 1969) – Expresses grief “at the extensive damage caused by arson to the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem” on August 21, 1969 “under the military occupation of Israel”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Determines that the execrable act of desecration and profanation of the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque emphasizes the immediate necessity of Israel’s desisting from acting in violation” previous resolutions and rescinding measures to annex Jerusalem, calls on Israel “to observe the provisions of the Geneva Conventions and international law governing military occupation”, and condemns Israel’s failure to comply with previous resolutions.

Res. 279 (May 12, 1970) – “Demands the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Res. 280 (May 19, 1970) – Expresses conviction that “that the Israeli military attack against Lebanon was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned in nature”, recalls resolution 279 “demanding the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory”, deplores Israel’s violation of resolutions 262 and 270, “Condemns Israel for its premeditated military action in violation of its obligations under the Charter of the United Nations”, and “Deplores the loss of life and damage to property inflicted as a result” of Israeli violations of Security Council resolutions.

Res. 285 (Sep. 5, 1970) – “Demands the complete and immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Israeli Violations of U.N. Security Council Resolutions[/QUOTE]





So which ones are breaches of International law then, and which are just anti semitic Jew hatred

 

[Picaro]

None. Next ...

None what? Care to explain WTF you're talking about?

Forget your own posts already? I gave you a direct and accurate answer to your question. You refuse to, as usual.

Yes, you're embarrassed by the answer, so avoid it. Typical of those who have no real principles and have no qualms about distorting the facts.

I didn't avoid that answer. I made the point your statement was moot.

Oh, of course you did

Yet nobody has brought any of these alleged 'violations' to the ICJ; that's because they're nonsense, and even a kangaroo Court won't touch them. It's just a load of drivel put out by sociopaths that cretins like yourself get woodies over repeating over and over.

Ah, the little kiss-ass troll, is trying to change the subject.

You tards keep posting gibberish about alledged 'violations'. So come up with some already, real ones, instead of just blathering nonsense. If there are all these 'violations' then just show us the ICJ cases where they've been found guilty. According to you, there are supposed to be zillions.

lol you didn't read even a single one of those, or you wouldn't be citing them as examples. Typical retarded bigot just cut and pasting from some propaganda site, too stupid to fact check even simple posts, so obviously 'shit bitch' is just projection on your part.

How the fuck would you know what I've read? You claimed the Pals were breaking international law, but couldn't cite one law to back up your claim. Whereas I posted a whole slew of resolutions Israel was in violation of and you don't even have the balls to comment on them.

You posted what?

Tell the truth now, lil Billy: Do you believe the Israelis are in charge of the UN flagpole?[/QUOTE]

Some of the earlier UN resolutions regarding Israel are listed in an admittedly pro-Palestine publication. However, such a list will would probably not be compiled in a pro-Israel source. On Wiki, with all the edits, I doubt it would be a reliable list. Each of these resolutions are available in the UN archives and can be checked out individually if anyone has any doubts as to the authenticity of the list.

Res. 57 (Sep. 18, 1948) – Expresses deep shock at the assassination of the U.N. Mediator in Palestine, Count Folke Bernadotte, by Zionist terrorists.

Res. 89 (Nov. 17, 1950) – Requests that attention be given to the expulsion of “thousands of Palestine Arabs” and calls upon concerned governments to take no further action “involving the transfer of persons across international frontiers or armistice lines”, and notes that Israel announced that it would withdraw to the armistice lines.

Res. 93 (May 18, 1951) – Finds that Israeli airstrikes on Syria on April 5, 1951 constitutes “a violation of the cease-fire”, and decides that Arab civilians expelled from the demilitarized zone by Israel should be allowed to return.

Res. 100 (Oct. 27, 1953) – Notes that Israel had said it would stop work it started in the demilitarized zone on September 2, 1953.

Res. 101 (Nov. 24, 1953) – Finds Israel’s attack on Qibya, Jordan on October 14-15, 1953 to be a violation of the cease-fire and “Expresses the strongest censure of that action”.

Res. 106 (Mar. 29, 1955) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Egyptian forces in the Gaza Strip on February 28, 1955.

Res. 111 (Jan. 19, 1956) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Syria on December 11, 1955 as “a flagrant violation of the cease-fire” and armistice agreement.

Res. 119 (Oct. 31, 1956) – Considers that “a grave situation has been created” by the attack against Egypt by the forces of Britain, France, and Israel.

Res. 171 (Apr. 9, 1962) – Reaffirms resolution 111 and determines that Israel’s attack on Syria on March 16-17, 1962 “constitutes a flagrant violation of that resolution”.

Res. 228 (Nov. 25, 1966) – “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property resulting from the action” by Israel in the southern Hebron area on November 13, 1966, and “Censures Israel for this large-scale military action in violation of the United Nations Charter” and the armistice agreement between Israel and Jordan.

Res. 237 (Jun. 14, 1967) – Calls on Israel “to ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants where military operations have taken place” during the war launched by Israel on June 5, 1967 “and to facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak of hostilities”.

Res. 242 (Nov. 22, 1967) – Emphasizes “the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”, emphasizes that member states have a commitment to abide by the U.N. Charter, and calls for the “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied” during the June 1967 war.

Res. 248 (Mar. 24, 1968) – Observes that the Israeli attack on Jordan “was of a large-scale and carefully planned nature”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, “Condemns the military action launched by Israel in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”, and “Calls upon Israel to desist from” further violations of resolution 237.

Res. 250 (Apr. 27, 1968) – Considers “that the holding of a military parade in Jerusalem will aggravate tensions in the area and have an adverse effect on a peaceful settlement of the problems in the area” and “Calls upon Israel to refrain from holding the military parade in Jerusalem which is contemplated” for May 2, 1968.

Res. 251 (May 2, 1968) – Recalls resolution 250 and “Deeply deplores the holding by Israel of the military parade in Jerusalem” on May 2, 1968 “in disregard of” resolution 250.

Res. 252 (May 21, 1968) – “Deplores the failure of Israel to comply with” General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, considers Israel’s annexation of Jerusalem “invalid”, and calls upon Israel “to rescind all such measures already taken and to desist forthwith from taking any further action which tends to change the status of Jerusalem”.

Res. 256 (Aug. 16, 1968) – Recalls Israel’s “flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter” condemned in resolution 248, observes that further Israeli air attacks on Jordan “were of a large scale and carefully planned nature in violation of resolution 248”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, and condemns Israel’s attacks.

Res. 259 (Sep. 27, 1968) – Expresses concern for “the safety, welfare and security” of the Palestinians “under military occupation by Israel”, deplores “the delay in the implementation of resolution 237 (1967) because of the conditions still being set by Israel for receiving a Special Representative of the Secretary-General”, and requests Israel to receive the Special Representative and facilitate his work.

Res. 262 (Dec. 31, 1968) – Observes “that the military action by the armed forces of Israel against the civil International Airport of Beirut was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned nature”, and condemns Israel for the attack.

Res.265 (Apr. 1, 1969) – Expresses “deep concern that the recent attacks on Jordanian villages and other populated areas were of a pre-planned nature, in violation of resolutions” 248 and 256, “Deplores the loss of civilian life and damage to property”, and “Condemns the recent premeditated air attacks launched by Israel on Jordanian villages and populated areas in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”.

Res. 267 (Jul. 3, 1969) – Recalls resolution 252 and General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, notes that “since the adoption of the above-mentioned resolutions Israel has taken further measures tending to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Deplores the failure of Israel to show any regard for the resolutions”, “Censures in the strongest terms all measures taken to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, “Confirms that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel which purport to alter the status of Jerusalem, including expropriation of land and properties thereon, are invalid and cannot change that status”, and urgently calls on Israel to rescind the measures taken to annex Jerusalem.

Res. 270 (Aug. 26, 1969) – “Condemns the premeditated air attack by Israel on villages in southern Lebanon in violation of its obligations under the Charter and Security Council resolutions”.

Res. 271 (Sep. 15, 1969) – Expresses grief “at the extensive damage caused by arson to the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem” on August 21, 1969 “under the military occupation of Israel”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Determines that the execrable act of desecration and profanation of the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque emphasizes the immediate necessity of Israel’s desisting from acting in violation” previous resolutions and rescinding measures to annex Jerusalem, calls on Israel “to observe the provisions of the Geneva Conventions and international law governing military occupation”, and condemns Israel’s failure to comply with previous resolutions.

Res. 279 (May 12, 1970) – “Demands the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Res. 280 (May 19, 1970) – Expresses conviction that “that the Israeli military attack against Lebanon was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned in nature”, recalls resolution 279 “demanding the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory”, deplores Israel’s violation of resolutions 262 and 270, “Condemns Israel for its premeditated military action in violation of its obligations under the Charter of the United Nations”, and “Deplores the loss of life and damage to property inflicted as a result” of Israeli violations of Security Council resolutions.

Res. 285 (Sep. 5, 1970) – “Demands the complete and immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Israeli Violations of U.N. Security Council Resolutions[/QUOTE]

So you also think the Israelis are in control of the flagpole at the UN building too, like lil Billy?

So which ones are breaches of International law then, and which are just anti semitic Jew hatred

None of them.

There is a reason why these clowns all run back to the lil clown car and jump back in when asked questions that require a straight answer, then drive around in a circle and all jump out again, pretend nothing happened, and repeat themselves.

 

[Billo_Really]

Forget your own posts already? I gave you a direct and accurate answer to your question. You refuse to, as usual.

Which question does "None. Next..." refer to?

Oh, of course you did

That's right. You couldn't tell me why it wasn't.

You tards keep posting gibberish about alledged 'violations'.

They're not alleged. I posted the actual violations.

So come up with some already, real ones, instead of just blathering nonsense.

I posted the real ones. You keep refusing to address them.

If there are all these 'violations' then just show us the ICJ cases where they've been found guilty.

You don't dictate how an international law is violated.

According to you, there are supposed to be zillions.

Now you're talking like a 10 year old.

You posted what?

You know what I posted. Stop asking dumbass questions.

Tell the truth now, lil Billy: Do you believe the Israelis are in charge of the UN flagpole?

WTF are you talking about?

Some of the earlier UN resolutions regarding Israel are listed in an admittedly pro-Palestine publication.

Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.

However, such a list will would probably not be compiled in a pro-Israel source.

Because the Israeli's practice censorship.

On Wiki, with all the edits, I doubt it would be a reliable list.

Conjectures and innuendo's are not valid rebuttals either.

Each of these resolutions are available in the UN archives and can be checked out individually if anyone has any doubts as to the authenticity of the list.

That's right. And they're all there.

So you also think the Israelis are in control of the flagpole at the UN building too, like lil Billy?

WTF are you talking about?

There is a reason why these clowns all run back to the lil clown car and jump back in when asked questions that require a straight answer, then drive around in a circle and all jump out again, pretend nothing happened, and repeat themselves.

Again, WTF are you talking about?

 

[Mindful]

Forget your own posts already? I gave you a direct and accurate answer to your question. You refuse to, as usual.

Which question does "None. Next..." refer to?

Oh, of course you did

That's right. You couldn't tell me why it wasn't.

You tards keep posting gibberish about alledged 'violations'.

They're not alleged. I posted the actual violations.

So come up with some already, real ones, instead of just blathering nonsense.

I posted the real ones. You keep refusing to address them.

If there are all these 'violations' then just show us the ICJ cases where they've been found guilty.

You don't dictate how an international law is violated.

According to you, there are supposed to be zillions.

Now you're talking like a 10 year old.

You posted what?

You know what I posted. Stop asking dumbass questions.

Tell the truth now, lil Billy: Do you believe the Israelis are in charge of the UN flagpole?

WTF are you talking about?

Some of the earlier UN resolutions regarding Israel are listed in an admittedly pro-Palestine publication.

Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.

However, such a list will would probably not be compiled in a pro-Israel source.

Because the Israeli's practice censorship.

On Wiki, with all the edits, I doubt it would be a reliable list.

Conjectures and innuendo's are not valid rebuttals either.

Each of these resolutions are available in the UN archives and can be checked out individually if anyone has any doubts as to the authenticity of the list.

That's right. And they're all there.

So you also think the Israelis are in control of the flagpole at the UN building too, like lil Billy?

WTF are you talking about?

There is a reason why these clowns all run back to the lil clown car and jump back in when asked questions that require a straight answer, then drive around in a circle and all jump out again, pretend nothing happened, and repeat themselves.

Again, WTF are you talking about?

WTF are you talking about?

On second thoughts, don't try to tell me.

 

[Billo_Really]

WTF are you talking about?

On second thoughts, don't try to tell me.

Little troll, doing her little trolling shit.

 

[Mindful]

WTF are you talking about?

On second thoughts, don't try to tell me.

Little troll, doing her little trolling shit.

Spoken like a true loser.

 

[Billo_Really]

Spoken like a true loser.

Trolls are so low, even a loser can spot one.

 

[Mindful]

Spoken like a true loser.

Trolls are so low, even a loser can spot one.

You must be taking selfies.