Here's a helping handTed Cruz is constitutionally eligible to be a U.S. Senator but he is definitely not constitutionally eligible to be President and Commander in Chief of our military.
He's either natural born....or naturalized. And being a citizen at birth, he wasn't naturalized. Leaving natural born as the only possible option. There are only the two types of citizenship we recognize in our law today. If you're not one, you're the other.
There is a technical difference in that if you are born overseas then there is a process the parents need to follow to get your citizenship. But that process is simple and automatic. But technically you are naturalized shortly after you were born.
However, that is not a process the founding fathers created. I can't imagine they possibly meant that a baby of a diplomat born in say France was not qualified to be President.
You realize too the Democrats started this whole idiotic birther thing with McCain, who was born on a freaking military base. A place the liberals also argue is the USA and therefore people get constitutional rights. Liberals follow multiple levels of double standards often on the same issue.
I've never argued that McCain wasn't a natural born citizen. So I have no idea what 'double standard' you're referring to. The only even remotely plausible candidate in the last 10 years that would be 100% ineligible....would be Schwartzenhegger.
You've been consistent, you are saying Obama and Cruz are natural born. I don't doubt you didn't personally question McCain. But seriously, you don't remember the left bringing up McCain and that maybe he's not qualified to be President? I find that hard to believe unless you're under 15. It was a big thing at one point, of course after McCain had clinched the nomination...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/us/politics/11mccain.html?_r=0