Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,864
- 2,040
Gawd people. STOP letting these dishonest medias like the bloomingidiot and NY slimes lead you around by the nose. They are slimy dishonest and in the bag for Democrats.
SNIP;
April 23, 2015 by Charles C. Johnson 7 Comments
Ted Cruz with David Panton, his best friend and debating partner.
Evidence from the student newspaper of Princeton’s college newspaper shows that the young Ted Cruz was a defender of women’s rights and not the anti-woman oaf.
Cruz favored instituting a patrol program at Princeton to cut down on violence and sexual assaults against women on campus, according to the Daily Princetonian on September 20, 1990.
Cruz also was a member of the campus safety committee on campus. He called for spending money to address the problem of date rape on campus instead of a costly $700,000 program to institute locks.
“Money should be spent on increasing proctor presence — especially in Prospect Gardens — and in an attempt to address the issue of date rape,” Cruz said to the Daily Princetonian in February 1991.
He thought date rape was such a serious problem that he gave multiple speeches against it. “I am very worried that administration concern for external crime is replacing concern for internal crime,” said committee member Ted Cruz. “The greater problem is date rape, or assaults by other students, which the planned system would do nothing to stop.”
Why mention this? Because there’s an effort afoot to make Ted Cruz look crazy based upon his past.
Yesterday the New York Times ran a hit piece by Jason Horowitz on Cruz’s past that suggested he was anti-woman based on the following anecdote.
In one debate, he proposed a method to detect infidelity, in which God should “give women a hymen that grows back every time she has intercourse with a different guy, because that will be a ‘visible sign’ of the breach of trust,” according to a recollection by David Kennedy published in a Harvard debate team reunion booklet in 2001. Mr. Kennedy’s debate partner mocked Mr. Cruz’s knowledge of the subject matter by contorting herself to see how the anatomy in question could be “visible,” according to the booklet.
The anti-Cruz remarks in the piece rely on two registered Democrats: Austan Goolsbee, a former advisor to Barack Obama, and a “David Kennedy,” who is probably the Harvard professor who backs the Marxist critical studies program.
This remark has been used to smear Cruz notes Charles C. W. Cooke in the media:
all of it here
Read more at EXCLUSIVE Archive Evidence Contradict NY Times Anti-Ted Cruz Hit Piece - GotNews
SNIP;
April 23, 2015 by Charles C. Johnson 7 Comments
Ted Cruz with David Panton, his best friend and debating partner.
Evidence from the student newspaper of Princeton’s college newspaper shows that the young Ted Cruz was a defender of women’s rights and not the anti-woman oaf.
Cruz favored instituting a patrol program at Princeton to cut down on violence and sexual assaults against women on campus, according to the Daily Princetonian on September 20, 1990.
Cruz also was a member of the campus safety committee on campus. He called for spending money to address the problem of date rape on campus instead of a costly $700,000 program to institute locks.
“Money should be spent on increasing proctor presence — especially in Prospect Gardens — and in an attempt to address the issue of date rape,” Cruz said to the Daily Princetonian in February 1991.
He thought date rape was such a serious problem that he gave multiple speeches against it. “I am very worried that administration concern for external crime is replacing concern for internal crime,” said committee member Ted Cruz. “The greater problem is date rape, or assaults by other students, which the planned system would do nothing to stop.”
Why mention this? Because there’s an effort afoot to make Ted Cruz look crazy based upon his past.
Yesterday the New York Times ran a hit piece by Jason Horowitz on Cruz’s past that suggested he was anti-woman based on the following anecdote.
In one debate, he proposed a method to detect infidelity, in which God should “give women a hymen that grows back every time she has intercourse with a different guy, because that will be a ‘visible sign’ of the breach of trust,” according to a recollection by David Kennedy published in a Harvard debate team reunion booklet in 2001. Mr. Kennedy’s debate partner mocked Mr. Cruz’s knowledge of the subject matter by contorting herself to see how the anatomy in question could be “visible,” according to the booklet.
The anti-Cruz remarks in the piece rely on two registered Democrats: Austan Goolsbee, a former advisor to Barack Obama, and a “David Kennedy,” who is probably the Harvard professor who backs the Marxist critical studies program.
This remark has been used to smear Cruz notes Charles C. W. Cooke in the media:
all of it here
Read more at EXCLUSIVE Archive Evidence Contradict NY Times Anti-Ted Cruz Hit Piece - GotNews