Teaching Obama

[francoHFW]

see sig, last line. Aren't you a WNYer or something? Your college?

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

.............

Shut it.

 

[francoHFW]

BTW, Raygun was a demented Oscar winner. Who defense spended us into a small recovery and into the S+L crisis and 20 years of killing the middle class and the country... Lotsa cruel stupid foreign policy. But great role.

 

[francoHFW]

You believe the Pub Propaganda Machine bs, Ill go with the rest of the WORLD.

Go.....as soon as possible.

I'm not going anywhere, hater dupe. I'm fixing your mess. BTW, you live in Canada lol...

YES, Reaganism worked, for a couple years, but this is ridiculous. See sig.

She lives in Canada?

"Canada: They started a country and nobody came."


Now for tonight's news: the two provably stupidest people in the world:

Blanko (goes without saying)

Anybody who actually pays attention to him.
(Raise your paw)



Oh...and for the record: I live in the center of the universe.

I do, San Francisco is the center of the Civilized Universe.

Or NY.

 

[francoHFW]

or Hudson Bay. ANYWAY, it ain't Pubworld.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I am glad you posted this, seriously. I want others to see the obvious ant-American rant, for Europe and Iran, against the Americas. This is what leftists/socialists support.

This is the base of Obama, the base of Hillary, the base of the NEW democratic party. Now then, you conservatives that are NOT registered to vote, can I give you any more of a reason after looking at this leftists diatribe, to do so!

Also fact, dingbat. Any argument? Pubs didn't cause the Great Depression. That didn't raise Hitler and Japanese militarists? It's not Anti-American pipsqueek, it's anti-GOP. Always a mess and ignorant voter base.

Actually, Franklin Roosevelt caused, and extended, the 'Great Depression.'

His policies took a recession and made it into a depression.

True story.

ACTUALLY, he brought UE down from 25% ton17% in 4 years. Not bad considering the wreck he had to deal with...The GOP is a slobberibg greedy idiot.

FDR inherited a recession....and made it worse.

Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., liberal New Deal historian wrote in The National Experience, in 1963, “Though the policies of the Hundred Days had ended despair, they had not produce recovery…”

He also wrote honestly about the devastating crash of 1937- in the midst of the “second New Deal” and Roosevelt’s second term.
“The collapse in the months after September 1937 was actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression: national income fell 13 %, payrolls 35 %, durable goods production 50 %, profits 78% .



"....actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression...."



blanko......have you realized yet that I am never wrong?

That's a lie. Unemployment peaked in 1933, the same year FDR was inaugurated. 1937 was not worse than 1933. That's another lie.

So.....Arthur Schlesinger, Jr is lying????

In that case he'd be a Liberal liar like you.


Try this:
Here is an interesting visual: imagine a triple line of the unemployed, three across, consisting of those unemployed under Hoover, in 1931. The line would have gonefrom Los Angeles, across the country, to the border of Maine.

What effect did Roosevelt have on the line?

Well, eight years later, in 1939, the length of the line would have gone further, from the Maine border, south to Boston, then on to New York City, then to Philadelphia, on to Washington, D.C.- and finally, into Virginia.
Folsom, "New Deal or Raw Deal"

Think Folsom was wrong?

Check it out at the US Bureau of the Census, 'Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970, I-126 andUnemployment Statistics during the Great Depression

 

[Wry Catcher]

Go.....as soon as possible.

I'm not going anywhere, hater dupe. I'm fixing your mess. BTW, you live in Canada lol...

YES, Reaganism worked, for a couple years, but this is ridiculous. See sig.

She lives in Canada?

"Canada: They started a country and nobody came."


Now for tonight's news: the two provably stupidest people in the world:

Blanko (goes without saying)

Anybody who actually pays attention to him.
(Raise your paw)



Oh...and for the record: I live in the center of the universe.

I do, San Francisco is the center of the Civilized Universe.

Or NY.

I've been to NYC three times, I had blast every time.

 

[PoliticalChic]

see sig, last line. Aren't you a WNYer or something? Your college?

My college has the greatest fight song in the nation!

Bar none!!

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm not going anywhere, hater dupe. I'm fixing your mess. BTW, you live in Canada lol...

YES, Reaganism worked, for a couple years, but this is ridiculous. See sig.

She lives in Canada?

"Canada: They started a country and nobody came."


Now for tonight's news: the two provably stupidest people in the world:

Blanko (goes without saying)

Anybody who actually pays attention to him.
(Raise your paw)



Oh...and for the record: I live in the center of the universe.

I do, San Francisco is the center of the Civilized Universe.

Or NY.

I've been to NYC three times, I had blast every time.

" I had blast every time."

Hey....are you making fun of the way Native Americans speak, Tonto??????

 

[PoliticalChic]

I am glad you posted this, seriously. I want others to see the obvious ant-American rant, for Europe and Iran, against the Americas. This is what leftists/socialists support.

This is the base of Obama, the base of Hillary, the base of the NEW democratic party. Now then, you conservatives that are NOT registered to vote, can I give you any more of a reason after looking at this leftists diatribe, to do so!

Also fact, dingbat. Any argument? Pubs didn't cause the Great Depression. That didn't raise Hitler and Japanese militarists? It's not Anti-American pipsqueek, it's anti-GOP. Always a mess and ignorant voter base.

Actually, Franklin Roosevelt caused, and extended, the 'Great Depression.'

His policies took a recession and made it into a depression.

True story.

ACTUALLY, he brought UE down from 25% ton17% in 4 years. Not bad considering the wreck he had to deal with...The GOP is a slobberibg greedy idiot.

FDR inherited a recession....and made it worse.

Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., liberal New Deal historian wrote in The National Experience, in 1963, “Though the policies of the Hundred Days had ended despair, they had not produce recovery…”

He also wrote honestly about the devastating crash of 1937- in the midst of the “second New Deal” and Roosevelt’s second term.
“The collapse in the months after September 1937 was actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression: national income fell 13 %, payrolls 35 %, durable goods production 50 %, profits 78% .



"....actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression...."



blanko......have you realized yet that I am never wrong?

That's a lie. Unemployment peaked in 1933, the same year FDR was inaugurated. 1937 was not worse than 1933. That's another lie.

In 1937 there were 7,700,000 Americans unemployed.



In 1938, 10,390,000 were out of work.

 

[Camp]

Also fact, dingbat. Any argument? Pubs didn't cause the Great Depression. That didn't raise Hitler and Japanese militarists? It's not Anti-American pipsqueek, it's anti-GOP. Always a mess and ignorant voter base.

Actually, Franklin Roosevelt caused, and extended, the 'Great Depression.'

His policies took a recession and made it into a depression.

True story.

ACTUALLY, he brought UE down from 25% ton17% in 4 years. Not bad considering the wreck he had to deal with...The GOP is a slobberibg greedy idiot.

FDR inherited a recession....and made it worse.

Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., liberal New Deal historian wrote in The National Experience, in 1963, “Though the policies of the Hundred Days had ended despair, they had not produce recovery…”

He also wrote honestly about the devastating crash of 1937- in the midst of the “second New Deal” and Roosevelt’s second term.
“The collapse in the months after September 1937 was actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression: national income fell 13 %, payrolls 35 %, durable goods production 50 %, profits 78% .



"....actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression...."



blanko......have you realized yet that I am never wrong?

That's a lie. Unemployment peaked in 1933, the same year FDR was inaugurated. 1937 was not worse than 1933. That's another lie.

So.....Arthur Schlesinger, Jr is lying????

In that case he'd be a Liberal liar like you.


Try this:
Here is an interesting visual: imagine a triple line of the unemployed, three across, consisting of those unemployed under Hoover, in 1931. The line would have gonefrom Los Angeles, across the country, to the border of Maine.

What effect did Roosevelt have on the line?

Well, eight years later, in 1939, the length of the line would have gone further, from the Maine border, south to Boston, then on to New York City, then to Philadelphia, on to Washington, D.C.- and finally, into Virginia.
Folsom, "New Deal or Raw Deal"

Think Folsom was wrong?

Check it out at the US Bureau of the Census, 'Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970, I-126 andUnemployment Statistics during the Great Depression

Ya, Folsom was wrong. The reason he was wrong was that as you have been informed so many times, the employees on public work projects were counted as unemployed under the method he used for calculating, which was the Lebergott method. In order for the line to be as long as he said all the men and women on public works projects would have had to quit their jobs to go stand in that line. When the alternative method, the Darby method is used, those folks with jobs are counted as employed.
Lebergott gave 1933 an unemployment estimate of 24.9% while Darby rated it at 20.6%.
Lebergott gave 1937 an unemployment estimate of 14.7% while Darby rated it at 9.1%.
Lebergott gave 1938 an unemployment estimate of 19.0% while Darby rated it at 12.5%.

Note that whichever method is used, the rates of unemployment in the 1937-38 recession are below what it was in 1933 when the Great Depression was in full impact and four years old if the crash of the market in 1929 is used as a starting point.

The difference in the two methods is that Lebergott rated employees without private industry jobs and calculated public works jobs as employees unemployed from private business and industry. The Darby method calculated employment in public works projects as valid employment that more accurately calculated actual persons with jobs, employed and receiving pay checks.

 

[Socialist]

Oh look, she's back..

 

[francoHFW]

Also fact, dingbat. Any argument? Pubs didn't cause the Great Depression. That didn't raise Hitler and Japanese militarists? It's not Anti-American pipsqueek, it's anti-GOP. Always a mess and ignorant voter base.

Actually, Franklin Roosevelt caused, and extended, the 'Great Depression.'

His policies took a recession and made it into a depression.

True story.

ACTUALLY, he brought UE down from 25% ton17% in 4 years. Not bad considering the wreck he had to deal with...The GOP is a slobberibg greedy idiot.

FDR inherited a recession....and made it worse.

Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., liberal New Deal historian wrote in The National Experience, in 1963, “Though the policies of the Hundred Days had ended despair, they had not produce recovery…”

He also wrote honestly about the devastating crash of 1937- in the midst of the “second New Deal” and Roosevelt’s second term.
“The collapse in the months after September 1937 was actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression: national income fell 13 %, payrolls 35 %, durable goods production 50 %, profits 78% .



"....actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression...."



blanko......have you realized yet that I am never wrong?

That's a lie. Unemployment peaked in 1933, the same year FDR was inaugurated. 1937 was not worse than 1933. That's another lie.

So.....Arthur Schlesinger, Jr is lying????

In that case he'd be a Liberal liar like you.


Try this:
Here is an interesting visual: imagine a triple line of the unemployed, three across, consisting of those unemployed under Hoover, in 1931. The line would have gonefrom Los Angeles, across the country, to the border of Maine.

What effect did Roosevelt have on the line?

Well, eight years later, in 1939, the length of the line would have gone further, from the Maine border, south to Boston, then on to New York City, then to Philadelphia, on to Washington, D.C.- and finally, into Virginia.
Folsom, "New Deal or Raw Deal"

Think Folsom was wrong?

Check it out at the US Bureau of the Census, 'Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970, I-126 andUnemployment Statistics during the Great Depression

BS. Yes , FDR tried GOP ideas in 1937.

 

[francoHFW]

Actually, Franklin Roosevelt caused, and extended, the 'Great Depression.'

His policies took a recession and made it into a depression.

True story.

ACTUALLY, he brought UE down from 25% ton17% in 4 years. Not bad considering the wreck he had to deal with...The GOP is a slobberibg greedy idiot.

FDR inherited a recession....and made it worse.

Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., liberal New Deal historian wrote in The National Experience, in 1963, “Though the policies of the Hundred Days had ended despair, they had not produce recovery…”

He also wrote honestly about the devastating crash of 1937- in the midst of the “second New Deal” and Roosevelt’s second term.
“The collapse in the months after September 1937 was actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression: national income fell 13 %, payrolls 35 %, durable goods production 50 %, profits 78% .

HOW BOUT LINKS TO THE FIGURES? And 1929-32 were much worse than 1937. Great job!! FDR DID make the mistake of Pub austerity in 1937. Worked like shytte.










"....actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression...."



blanko......have you realized yet that I am never wrong?

That's a lie. Unemployment peaked in 1933, the same year FDR was inaugurated. 1937 was not worse than 1933. That's another lie.

So.....Arthur Schlesinger, Jr is lying????

In that case he'd be a Liberal liar like you.


Try this:
Here is an interesting visual: imagine a triple line of the unemployed, three across, consisting of those unemployed under Hoover, in 1931. The line would have gonefrom Los Angeles, across the country, to the border of Maine.

What effect did Roosevelt have on the line?

Well, eight years later, in 1939, the length of the line would have gone further, from the Maine border, south to Boston, then on to New York City, then to Philadelphia, on to Washington, D.C.- and finally, into Virginia.
Folsom, "New Deal or Raw Deal"

Think Folsom was wrong?

Check it out at the US Bureau of the Census, 'Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970, I-126 andUnemployment Statistics during the Great Depression

BS. Yes , FDR tried GOP ideas in 1937.

HOW BOUT LINKS TO THE FIGURES? And 1929-32 were much worse than 1937. Great job!! FDR DID make the mistake of Pub austerity in 1937. Worked like shytte.

 

[Camp]

ACTUALLY, he brought UE down from 25% ton17% in 4 years. Not bad considering the wreck he had to deal with...The GOP is a slobberibg greedy idiot.

FDR inherited a recession....and made it worse.

Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., liberal New Deal historian wrote in The National Experience, in 1963, “Though the policies of the Hundred Days had ended despair, they had not produce recovery…”

He also wrote honestly about the devastating crash of 1937- in the midst of the “second New Deal” and Roosevelt’s second term.
“The collapse in the months after September 1937 was actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression: national income fell 13 %, payrolls 35 %, durable goods production 50 %, profits 78% .

HOW BOUT LINKS TO THE FIGURES? And 1929-32 were much worse than 1937. Great job!! FDR DID make the mistake of Pub austerity in 1937. Worked like shytte.










"....actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression...."



blanko......have you realized yet that I am never wrong?

That's a lie. Unemployment peaked in 1933, the same year FDR was inaugurated. 1937 was not worse than 1933. That's another lie.

So.....Arthur Schlesinger, Jr is lying????

In that case he'd be a Liberal liar like you.


Try this:
Here is an interesting visual: imagine a triple line of the unemployed, three across, consisting of those unemployed under Hoover, in 1931. The line would have gonefrom Los Angeles, across the country, to the border of Maine.

What effect did Roosevelt have on the line?

Well, eight years later, in 1939, the length of the line would have gone further, from the Maine border, south to Boston, then on to New York City, then to Philadelphia, on to Washington, D.C.- and finally, into Virginia.
Folsom, "New Deal or Raw Deal"

Think Folsom was wrong?

Check it out at the US Bureau of the Census, 'Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970, I-126 andUnemployment Statistics during the Great Depression

BS. Yes , FDR tried GOP ideas in 1937.

HOW BOUT LINKS TO THE FIGURES? And 1929-32 were much worse than 1937. Great job!! FDR DID make the mistake of Pub austerity in 1937. Worked like shytte.

isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1377262.files/The%20Great%20Depression/Margo.pdf

Here ya go. Harvard is usually pretty reliable and accepted as legit.

 

[francoHFW]

see sig, last line. Aren't you a WNYer or something? Your college?

My college has the greatest fight song in the nation!

Bar none!!

Who's that? ND, Ws? I wen t to Hobart, UB, ECC, Buff St., Geneseo, Central College Ia. Year in Paris, Geneseo and Brockport, U of R. No fight songs, just abusive yelling...

 

[francoHFW]

FDR inherited a recession....and made it worse.

Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., liberal New Deal historian wrote in The National Experience, in 1963, “Though the policies of the Hundred Days had ended despair, they had not produce recovery…”

He also wrote honestly about the devastating crash of 1937- in the midst of the “second New Deal” and Roosevelt’s second term.
“The collapse in the months after September 1937 was actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression: national income fell 13 %, payrolls 35 %, durable goods production 50 %, profits 78% .

HOW BOUT LINKS TO THE FIGURES? And 1929-32 were much worse than 1937. Great job!! FDR DID make the mistake of Pub austerity in 1937. Worked like shytte.










"....actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression...."



blanko......have you realized yet that I am never wrong?

That's a lie. Unemployment peaked in 1933, the same year FDR was inaugurated. 1937 was not worse than 1933. That's another lie.

So.....Arthur Schlesinger, Jr is lying????

In that case he'd be a Liberal liar like you.


Try this:
Here is an interesting visual: imagine a triple line of the unemployed, three across, consisting of those unemployed under Hoover, in 1931. The line would have gonefrom Los Angeles, across the country, to the border of Maine.

What effect did Roosevelt have on the line?

Well, eight years later, in 1939, the length of the line would have gone further, from the Maine border, south to Boston, then on to New York City, then to Philadelphia, on to Washington, D.C.- and finally, into Virginia.
Folsom, "New Deal or Raw Deal"

Think Folsom was wrong?

Check it out at the US Bureau of the Census, 'Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970, I-126 andUnemployment Statistics during the Great Depression

BS. Yes , FDR tried GOP ideas in 1937.

HOW BOUT LINKS TO THE FIGURES? And 1929-32 were much worse than 1937. Great job!! FDR DID make the mistake of Pub austerity in 1937. Worked like shytte.

isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1377262.files/The%20Great%20Depression/Margo.pdf

Here ya go. Harvard is usually pretty reliable and accepted as legit.

TYVM. Now we know I'm right again. FDR did great. From your link...
"
Between 1929 and 1933 the unemployment rate increased by over 20
percentage points, according to the Lebergott series, or by 17 percentage
points, according to Darby's series. For the remainder of the decade, the
unemployment rate stayed in, or hovered around, double digits. On the eve of
America's entry into World War II, between 9.5 and 14.6 percent of the labor
force was out of work, depending on how unemployment is measured."

And people SURVIVED because of FDR. Pubs REALLY wrecked the world that time. Thank god the Dems got in fast in 2009....

 

[francoHFW]

Also fact, dingbat. Any argument? Pubs didn't cause the Great Depression. That didn't raise Hitler and Japanese militarists? It's not Anti-American pipsqueek, it's anti-GOP. Always a mess and ignorant voter base.

Actually, Franklin Roosevelt caused, and extended, the 'Great Depression.'

His policies took a recession and made it into a depression.

True story.

ACTUALLY, he brought UE down from 25% ton17% in 4 years. Not bad considering the wreck he had to deal with...The GOP is a slobberibg greedy idiot.

FDR inherited a recession....and made it worse.

Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., liberal New Deal historian wrote in The National Experience, in 1963, “Though the policies of the Hundred Days had ended despair, they had not produce recovery…”

He also wrote honestly about the devastating crash of 1937- in the midst of the “second New Deal” and Roosevelt’s second term.
“The collapse in the months after September 1937 was actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression: national income fell 13 %, payrolls 35 %, durable goods production 50 %, profits 78% .



"....actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression...."



blanko......have you realized yet that I am never wrong?

That's a lie. Unemployment peaked in 1933, the same year FDR was inaugurated. 1937 was not worse than 1933. That's another lie.

In 1937 there were 7,700,000 Americans unemployed.



In 1938, 10,390,000 were out of work.

Because FDR tried austerity- Believed Pubs and corporate economists.

 

[francoHFW]

I'm not going anywhere, hater dupe. I'm fixing your mess. BTW, you live in Canada lol...

YES, Reaganism worked, for a couple years, but this is ridiculous. See sig.

She lives in Canada?

"Canada: They started a country and nobody came."


Now for tonight's news: the two provably stupidest people in the world:

Blanko (goes without saying)

Anybody who actually pays attention to him.
(Raise your paw)



Oh...and for the record: I live in the center of the universe.

I do, San Francisco is the center of the Civilized Universe.

Or NY.

I've been to NYC three times, I had blast every time.

Been to SF for a week. Cow Valley fun. lol. Innuits not so much.

 

[frigidweirdo]

1. Way back before the 'Dawning of an Error,' in 2008, we on the Right warned about Obama- not just his political nature....but about how untried and inexperienced he was.

Of course, events proved us right as well as Right.

His record of domestic as well as foreign policy failure is way longer than Freddy Gray's criminal record.

And, currently, his most egregious design: the Iran Nuclear treaty.



2. For purposes of edification, both of Obama/Kerry, and the dolts who support this administration, here is the way negotiations are carried on by the finest President of the last hundred years.
Read, and note well:

"Reagan was made from far sterner stuff than was his Soviet counterpart. His genial grin and wise-cracking demeanor concealed a spine of steel when push came to shove. Yet at their next meeting in Reykjavik in 1986, where Gorbachev would not budge on the "Star Wars" question, Reagan was decisive and unforgiving.

He recalls in An American Life how he stood up from the table to proclaim that the meeting was over. Then he turned to his Secretary of State:
"Let's go, George. We're leaving."

Like any good diplomat, Shultz was crushed by so much roughness, but Reagan was completely unfazed. Later on, he explained: "I went to Reykjavik determined that everything was negotiable except two things, our freedom and our future."
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2751/is_77/ai_n6353166/pg_6/?tag=content;col1

The Amazing and Mysterious Life of Ronald Reagan The National Interest




"....he stood up from the table to proclaim that the meeting was over. Then he turned to his Secretary of State:
"Let's go, George. We're leaving."



3. Instead, America bows under this:

"Tehran (AFP) - Iran hit out Friday against US Secretary of State John Kerry, accusing him of threatening military action against Tehran if it fails to respect a historic nuclear deal sealed on July 14.
"Unfortunately the US Secretary of State once again talked about the rotten rope of 'the ability of the US for using military force'," said Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in a statement.

Zarif decried what he called the "uselessness of such empty threats against the nation of Iran and the resistance of the nation of Iran", and said such remarks should be consigned "to the last century".
Iran hits out at Kerry s empty threats - Yahoo News




Such is the result of sending a boy to do a man's job....

Who are the fools who put such power in Obama's hands?

Moral of the story. If what you do isn't what the right would do, then you lack the balls to be president.

Sounds ridiculous to me.