Teacher - and CNN citizen reporter - fired after after school digs up past as gay por

[Wicked Jester]

What questions? Are you still wanting to know whether I 'support' you or not?

I fully support your right to make a total ass of your ignorant and insecure self, yes.

I'm not a deviant, perverted fudge packer, son. And your attempts to imply it doesn't bother me a bit.

So, you're too cowardly to engage. To answers questions.

I'll just lay it out, lil' man.

You obviously give the impression that you support and defend "gays"......But then you run around using the term "faggot" against other people, which to the so-called "gays" is on par with the word "******".......You then accuse people of being "gay".....Obviously implying that there is something wrong with being "gay", and that the implication is meant as an insult, because it's quite clear you don't respect "gays".

Once again, we have a liberal idiot who has fully exposed himself as a fraud.....Fully exposed himself as a true fuckin' hypocrite.

Good job, assclown!

 

[Avatar9]

What questions? Are you still wanting to know whether I 'support' you or not?

I fully support your right to make a total ass of your ignorant and insecure self, yes.

I'm not a deviant, perverted fudge packer, son. And your attempts to imply it doesn't bother me a bit.

Is that why you can't stop talking about getting your fudge packed and you keep getting to worked up thinking about it?

You obviously give the impression that you support and defend "gays"......

I already said I support your right to get your fudge packed and make an idiot of yourself on the interwebs. What more do you want? You want to marry your gay lover/ I really don't care if you do, so long as you're both of age.

But then you run around using the term "faggot" against other people, which to the so-called "gays" is on par with the word "******"

You want me to apologizing for hurting your feelings? Do you feel gay-bashed? If so, I suggest leaving the thread and not bringing the subject up in the future, since it's obviously a very tender subject for you.

.......You then accuse people of being "gay".....Obviously implying that there is something wrong with being "gay", and that the implication is meant as an insult, because it's quite clear you don't respect "gays".

Is '"gays"'your other screen name?

Do you always think this much about homosexual acts? Do you always get so excited when you do?

 

[Wicked Jester]

What questions? Are you still wanting to know whether I 'support' you or not?

I fully support your right to make a total ass of your ignorant and insecure self, yes.

I'm not a deviant, perverted fudge packer, son. And your attempts to imply it doesn't bother me a bit.

Is that why you can't stop talking about getting your fudge packed and you keep getting to worked up thinking about it?

I already said I support your right to get your fudge packed and make an idiot of yourself on the interwebs. What more do you want? You want to marry your gay lover/ I really don't care if you do, so long as you're both of age.

But then you run around using the term "faggot" against other people, which to the so-called "gays" is on par with the word "******"

You want me to apologizing for hurting your feelings? Do you feel gay-bashed? If so, I suggest leaving the thread and not bringing the subject up in the future, since it's obviously a very tender subject for you.

.......You then accuse people of being "gay".....Obviously implying that there is something wrong with being "gay", and that the implication is meant as an insult, because it's quite clear you don't respect "gays".

Is '"gays"'your other screen name?

Do you always think this much about homosexual acts? Do you always get so excited when you do?

You exposed yourself, youngster.

You don't respect "gays", you use them as insults.......You obviously are too fuckin' clueless as to understand your own hypocrisy.

And it's been my pleasure to expose it, assclown........You're welcome!

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Ok people, knock it off now, I agree that this teacher should have been fired for openly having his pornography on the web while being a teacher, he should have taken that offline and kept that to himself and stop trying to somehow look for ways to ridicule the person who discovered his secret, with the proliferation of pornography online one doesn't have to purposely "seek" out dirt on someone and the person who discovered his past isn't the culprit.

 

[BDBoop]

I'm not here to win any popularity contests. That's for pussies and fudge packers.....I speak my mind. And anybody who doesn't like it, too fuckin' bad.

​

Ya' gonna answer the questions I posed to you, son......Or are you going to run like your lil' buddy punkatore does?

LMAO!

I'm glad he found your picture. Lovely.

 

[Wicked Jester]

​

Ya' gonna answer the questions I posed to you, son......Or are you going to run like your lil' buddy punkatore does?

LMAO!

I'm glad he found your picture. Lovely.

What picture?

I don't bother opening up pictures here......It's childish, and a waste of time.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Other than Pee-wee Ranger, does anyone else honestly believe homosexuality is a "choice"?

Those who believe it is a choice probably do so because they have gay leanings, and have thus far not made said choice.

What about the people who have actually looked at the scientific evidence which conclusively proves that sexual choice is not genetic or environmental? Are they gay simply because they understand science?

 

[Avatar9]

Other than Pee-wee Ranger, does anyone else honestly believe homosexuality is a "choice"?

Those who believe it is a choice probably do so because they have gay leanings, and have thus far not made said choice.

What about the people who have actually looked at the scientific evidence which conclusively proves that sexual choice is not genetic or environmental? Are they gay simply because they understand science?

No, they'd be non-existent, though that still wouldn't make it a choice

They found that the posterior part of the corpus callosum is larger in homosexual than heterosexual men.

The size of the corpus callosum is largely inherited suggesting a genetic factor in sexual orientation, said Witelson "Our results do not mean that heredity is destiny but they do indicate that environment is not the only player in the field," she said.
...
The researchers also undertook a correlational analysis which included size of the corpus callosum, and test scores scores on language, visual spatial and finger dexterity tests. "By using all these variables, we were able to predict sexual orientation in 95 per cent of the cases," she said.
Genetics Has A Role In Determining Sexual Orientation In Men, Further Evidence

Several studies also have shown that homosexuality tends to run in families. The probability that the brother of a gay man is gay is about four times higher than normal. Similarly, the odds that the sister of a lesbian is also a lesbian is significantly higher than normal. However, male homosexuality and lesbianism tend to run in different families: sisters with gay brothers are not more likely than normal to be lesbian. A 1993 study that traced the pedigree of pairs of gay brothers found that homosexuality tends to run on the maternal side of the family tree: the brothers had a higher than average number of maternal nephews and uncles who are gay.
Identical twin studies shed additional light on the genetic underpinnings of sexual preference. If there are differences in preference between identical twins, who share the same genes, then that difference cannot be genetic. Here, the research indicates that in cases where one identical male twin is gay, about half the time the other twin is gay as well. "This is way above 4 percent, so it's got to be genetic, but it is nowhere near 100 percent," Goldstein said. The percentages for lesbian twins are slightly lower, but generally comparable.
DNA studies have identified the general location of at least one "gay gene." The maternal heritability of male homosexuality narrowed the region where such a gene must reside to the X chromosome, because sons get this chromosome from their mother. Analysis of DNA markers on the X chromosomes of sibling pairs has further narrowed the search to a region called XQ28. It consists of hundreds of genes and is located near the tip of the X chromosome. However, there is some indication that genes located elsewhere may have a similar effect on sexual orientation, Goldstein said.
Fetal development studies suggest how such a gene might influence such a complex behavior. The development of a fetus into a male is accomplished by the development of the testes, which produce testosterone, which has a wide range of physiological effects. During the perinatal period, a week before and after birth, testosterone has an irreversible organizing effect on the body and brain of males. If the hormone is absent during this period, the individual's anatomy and behavior never can become wholly male. A testosterone surge during puberty activates male sexual development and behavior.
Differences between gay and straight sexual orientation appear at a very early age. In a study, a group of openly homosexual men were asked when they first became aware of their attraction to men and boys, when they realized that they were gay and when they "came out" to others. The group reported becoming aware of their attraction at a very young age, between 5 years old and puberty. Self-awareness of their sexual orientation took place around puberty, and coming out of the closet took place much later.
Biological basis of sexual orientation


Animal models have indicated that androgenic steroids acting before birth might influence the sexual orientation of adult humans. Here we examine the androgen-sensitive pattern of finger lengths1, and find evidence that homosexual women are exposed to more prenatal androgen than heterosexual women are; also, men with more than one older brother, who are more likely than first-born males to be homosexual in adulthood, are exposed to more prenatal androgen than eldest sons. Prenatal androgens may therefore influence adult human sexual orientation in both sexes, and a mother's body appears to 'remember' previously carried sons, altering the fetal development of subsequent sons and increasing the likelihood of homosexuality in adulthood.
Homosexuality and finger length
​

 

[FA_Q2]

Other than Pee-wee Ranger, does anyone else honestly believe homosexuality is a "choice"?

Those who believe it is a choice probably do so because they have gay leanings, and have thus far not made said choice.

What about the people who have actually looked at the scientific evidence which conclusively proves that sexual choice is not genetic or environmental? Are they gay simply because they understand science?

Never seen anything that would suggest that. You have any links?

 

[manifold]

What about the people who have actually looked at the scientific evidence which conclusively proves that sexual choice is not genetic or environmental?

Nothing has been conclusively proven one way or the other. Claiming otherwise just makes you look like a fucking liar, or an ignorant asshole.

But whatcha gonna do?

 

[Wicked Jester]

What about the people who have actually looked at the scientific evidence which conclusively proves that sexual choice is not genetic or environmental?

Nothing has been conclusively proven one way or the other. Claiming otherwise just makes you look like a fucking liar, or an ignorant asshole.

But whatcha gonna do?

So, seeing as tough "nothing has been conclusively proven one way or the other", then those claiming one is born that way are fucking liars, or ignorant assholes, correct?

But watcha gonna do. Can't have it both ways!

 

[manifold]

What about the people who have actually looked at the scientific evidence which conclusively proves that sexual choice is not genetic or environmental?

Nothing has been conclusively proven one way or the other. Claiming otherwise just makes you look like a fucking liar, or an ignorant asshole.

But whatcha gonna do?

So, seeing as tough "nothing has been conclusively proven one way or the other", then those claiming one is born that way are fucking liars, or ignorant assholes, correct?

But watcha gonna do. Can't have it both ways!

Incorrect.

If he merely 'claimed' it as his opinion then he'd be neither a liar nor an ignorant asshole. But he didn't merely claim it as his opinion, he claimed that it was 'conclusively proven'.

 

[BDBoop]

Probably as close as we can get.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVwjCppq82c]Are we born straight or gay? - Making of Me: John Barrowman - BBC - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Wicked Jester]

Nothing has been conclusively proven one way or the other. Claiming otherwise just makes you look like a fucking liar, or an ignorant asshole.

But whatcha gonna do?

So, seeing as tough "nothing has been conclusively proven one way or the other", then those claiming one is born that way are fucking liars, or ignorant assholes, correct?

But watcha gonna do. Can't have it both ways!

Incorrect.

If he merely 'claimed' it as his opinion then he'd be neither a liar nor an ignorant asshole. But he didn't merely claim it as his opinion, he claimed that it was 'conclusively proven'.

Yeah, OK!

 

[JakeStarkey]

A porn star of any sort should not be teaching children.

 

[manifold]

So, seeing as tough "nothing has been conclusively proven one way or the other", then those claiming one is born that way are fucking liars, or ignorant assholes, correct?

But watcha gonna do. Can't have it both ways!

Incorrect.

If he merely 'claimed' it as his opinion then he'd be neither a liar nor an ignorant asshole. But he didn't merely claim it as his opinion, he claimed that it was 'conclusively proven'.

Yeah, OK!

What's with the

Are you telling me you can't distinguish between fact and opinion?

 

[manifold]

A porn star of any sort should not be teaching children.

Yup.

But to be honest, I'm not sure how this thread is still going because I don't recall anyone explicitly disagreeing with his being fired.

 

[ColonialMarine]

No surprise here. Most liberals are perverts.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No surprise here. Most liberals are perverts.

The porn actor is a conservative.

 

[manifold]

No surprise here. Most liberals are perverts.

The porn actor is a conservative.

No surprise here. Most conservatives are queers, closeted or otherwise.