Teacher - and CNN citizen reporter - fired after after school digs up past as gay por

I spread no lies. She attacked me for pointing out the idiocy of another poster's homophobia and scaremongering regarding child molestation. Hence she either supports homophobia or supports the molestation off children by Catholic priests.

The fact is that a catholic priest is more likely than a homosexual to molest your son. You might not like that fact, but attacking me doesn't change the fact at hand. If the OP wants to go on about keeping homosexuals away from children because they're statistically no more like to molest your children, then (s)he should be clamoring to keep catholic priests away from children, since they are statistically much more likely to molest your son.

Clearly, you, cg, and the Op don't care at all about the children or what happens to them. You're just a bunch of homophobic bigots like countless others before you.

Go fuck yourself shit for brains! You clearly know nothing about me, and making false accusations just shows how fucking juvenile you are. Now tell us whose sock you are!

Oh, and before calling me a homophobic bigot, perhaps you should do some research on post I have made in these forums. You have a few posts under your belt and here you are already accusing people of all sorts. It is, in fact, you who are sounding like the bigot!
 
My, such language. And so many exclamation points- because you sound so much more intelligent when you yell... clearly, you've much intelligent and thoughtful input to contribute to this forum :rolleyes:

Thanks for establishing that it's safe to skip past your posts in the future, since reading them would clearly be nothing but a waste of time. I won't have to waste any of that time from this point forward.
 
My, such language. And so many exclamation points- because you sound so much more intelligent when you yell... clearly, you've much intelligent and thoughtful input to contribute to this forum :rolleyes:

Thanks for establishing that it's safe to skip past your posts in the future, since reading them would clearly be nothing but a waste of time. I won't have to waste any of that time from this point forward.

Excellent. I shall be watching yours like a hawk! Still scared to tell us whose sock puppet you are, I see.
 
What if he was an accountant, or a fireman, or a cop, or a CEO or a congressman?

Ought he to be fired then?

If he were a CEO or Congressman, he'd have been encouraged to resign.

I think a cop might have been fired for such a thing.

But there is a good reason to fire a teacher for appearing in a pornographic film (and it doesn't matter if it's a gay film or a straight film). Teachers are role models. They are supposed to exert a positive influence over a child's life. If the kid sees or hears that a teacher appeared in such films makes those activities acceptable, and I don't think any school would want to set the precedent.

This isn't about gay rights/anti-homosexuality. It's about teachers being held to a higher standard of personal conduct.

I'm actually kind of surprised that they were able to fire him, truth to be told. The Teacher Thug Unions make that as difficult as pulling teeth. So you have to imagine these films were pretty awful if they didn't want to stand up for the guy.

The mind of the conservative is an amazing thing to observe.

Teachers are held to a higher standard suggests the behavior which resulted in the firing is acceptable for other occupations. Which occupations are held to lower standards? Since the act is done away from the job, are other activities engaged by teachers which offend school boards also restricted/punshed? Should a board have the power to fire a single teacher who engages in premarital sex, or a heterosexual teacher who kills animals for sport?

The nature of a sexual act may offend some, but engaging in "perverted acts" has yet to be defined. Are teachers hired with a morals clause in their contract, and does said contract define what is 'normal' and what is perverted (is a manual supplied)? Pornography itself is relative to a community, is it not? So is soft porn okay, but not hardcore porn? And what or who decides which is which?
 
What if he was an accountant, or a fireman, or a cop, or a CEO or a congressman?

Ought he to be fired then?

If he were a CEO or Congressman, he'd have been encouraged to resign.
But NOT fired?

I think a cop might have been fired for such a thing.

Why?


But there is a good reason to fire a teacher for appearing in a pornographic film (and it doesn't matter if it's a gay film or a straight film). Teachers are role models. They are supposed to exert a positive influence over a child's life. If the kid sees or hears that a teacher appeared in such films makes those activities acceptable, and I don't think any school would want to set the precedent.


Understood.

This isn't about gay rights/anti-homosexuality. It's about teachers being held to a higher standard of personal conduct.

Yes it is, I agree. Which is why I asked if other professions are held to the same standards.

I'm actually kind of surprised that they were able to fire him, truth to be told. The Teacher Thug Unions make that as difficult as pulling teeth. So you have to imagine these films were pretty awful if they didn't want to stand up for the guy.

Doesn't surprise me one bit.

Teachers are held to a higher standard that pretty much every other profession.

Even the HINT of impropriety can destroy most teacher's careers.

I've seen that happen to perfectly innocent teachers.
 
I'm surprised that the gay lovers haven't called this discrimination against gays, maybe they realize that it actually isn't.

Did it ever occur to you that Loftis may not be gay, as many actors in gay porn are straight.

It’s called: Acting.

And even if he were gay, he was fired for the porn, not being gay.

The dude is gay, no straight man takes a penis up his butt just to "act".

:lol:

Fudge packing for cash has been around for forever. When you are a male teen on the street in any country and homeless and you discover if all you have to do is either bend over or get on your knees for cash so you can buy your next hit, you do it.

And there are a quizzlion dudes wanting to work a young mans anus over.

Now back to the OP

Does anyone think maybe he might just be a really shitty worker?
 
First off, you don't just "dig up" gay porn. Whoever this "school official" is was probably on the Internet one night using one hand and found him and rubbed a few out before going to tell. I gotta say, though, I like that this guy said screw it and went back to porn. He didn't try to martyr himself all like, "this was apart of my past...I've changed and now I just want to help the children." He was like, "ah well, you gonna fire me? Get me the KY jelly!" Hats off to 'em.
 
First off, you don't just "dig up" gay porn

True dat!

Unless this guy was really unlucky somebody set out to find this guys past and expose him for it.
 
What if he was an accountant, or a fireman, or a cop, or a CEO or a congressman?

Ought he to be fired then?

If he were a CEO or Congressman, he'd have been encouraged to resign.

But NOT fired?


In the case of the Congressman, the only people who have the ability to fire him are the voters. In the case of the CEO, the board could fire him, but more likely, they'd ask for his resignation and get it. (Because the guy wouldn't want to lose his stock options, etc.)


Yes it is, I agree. Which is why I asked if other professions are held to the same standards.

And again, I think some are held to lower standards. In the last year, I saw a supervisor get fired for having sex with an employee in her office. (It got around because he took pictures on his phone and showed them to his buddies on the first shift.) Another supervisor knew about it but didn't tell the manager. He got fired.

I've also seen people get fired for falsifying time reports, saying bad things about the company on their resume and posting it on CraigsList, and goofing of on the internet when they should have been working.

So, really, other professions are held to a pretty strict standard, compared to this guy.


Doesn't surprise me one bit.

Teachers are held to a higher standard that pretty much every other profession.

Even the HINT of impropriety can destroy most teacher's careers.

I've seen that happen to perfectly innocent teachers.

But don't you think they should be? I screw up on my job, maybe something doesn't get delivered on time, maybe a production line has to have some lost time. Bad, but not the end of the world. A teacher messes up on his or her job, they've pretty much screwed up a kid for life. Given the sensitivy of their work, and the reprecussions of something traumatic, shouldn't they be held to a much higher standard?
 
Apparently, california girl supports child molestation and/or homophobia.

Homosexuals are far less likely that catholic priests to molest children, yet she rushes to support another poster's homophobia while refusing to protect children from pedopriests.

Why is that, cg?

Where did she say that? She hasn't even posted in this thread.!
She neg repped me behind the scenes for pointing out that, statistically speaking, catholic priests are a greater danger to your son than homosexuals or the general public.
Oooooooooh you're one of those neg rep whiners........Well, you just got busted back down to the red zone.....Whine about that, ya' sensitive lil' whimp.
 
And you are still trying to pretend you are not a bigot? Or still too gutless to admit it?
It's a simple damn CHOICE.......Pussy or Toxic Waste Dump.

Normal men who are not perverted deviants, CHOOSE THE PUSSY........Perverted deviants CHOOSE THE TOXIC WASTE DUMP.......And it's no wonder that gay men suffer on average more various diseases due to their deviance, then straight men.

Sick fuckin' perverted deviants CHOOSE to engage in sex with their own gender.

And don't give me your damn, whiney PC bullshit.

You don't like it?.......Go find a damn a damn kumbaya board, where are all you whiney ass PC idiots can piss and moan together........'cause no amount of your incessent whining is going to change a god damn thing!
You're awfully sensitive about this subject. Why is that? Did you grow up Catholic or something?
Neg rep attacks, Jester?

My, you're really sensitive about your sexual confusion, aren't you?

It;'s okay, man. This is a safe place. You can some out of the closet now. You're among friends.
 
sensitive lil' whimp.
:lol:

Says the closet case throwing a hissy fit because you don't hide your faggotry as well as you think
Lets see, lil' man.

Do you support so-called "gays"......Do you stand up for them when attacked, verbally or physically?

Serious questions.

And BTW, your lil' BS insinuations don't bother me a bit.....Unlike you, I get plenty of hot wet pussy........Got some just this morning as matter of fact.......I have no desire to CHOOSE to be a deviant pervert who rams dudes up the ass.......I'm not a sick fuck like you.

Now, answer my questions.
 
Last edited:
:lol:

Jester reminds me of those kids in middle school who'd never seen a boob before, always talking about how many boobs they'd touched.
 
sensitive lil' whimp.
:lol:

Says the closet case throwing a hissy fit because you don't hide your faggotry as well as you think
So, ya' sensitive lil' guy, why are you avoiding my question to you. Are you just another lil' unkatore type who only cherry picks, and doesn't have the guts to engage?

I'll ask again......Do you respect and support "gays". Will you stand up for them when they are verbally or physically attacked?

It's a simple question.
 
Are you just another lil' unkatore type who only cherry picks, and doesn't have the guts to engage?.



Unlike a real tough guy such as yourself who lacks the balls to own up to what he is and who hides behind straw men when he can't hold up his own argument? You must cause quite the ruckus at the Bingo parlor every Wednesday night when you don't win. But that's ok, your 25 cats are warm and wet and keep you company when the elder van takes you home.
 

Forum List

Back
Top