Frankly, Poo went wrong way back when he started trying to argue an adult subject - taxes - from a fundamentally childish premise - fairness - so it's really not surprising that everything that has come after was juvenile garbage.
There is no such thing as "fair". How can there be, when the word itself has no real meaning? It's the most subjective word in the English language, meaning something different to each and every person who hears it. Only children in schoolyards believe there is such a thing as "fair", or that the universe and anything in it is ever going to comply with that imaginary concept.
I disagree. I think that there are many ways for people to be fair with each other - usually in a mutually beneficial way. If there weren't, the 'free market' would be impossible and slavery would still reign as the most effective method of putting people to work and maintaining trust within production organizations.
Of course there are "many ways for people to be fair". Y'know why? Because there are many definitions of "fair". As many definitions as there are people trying to use the word to justify their own particular agenda.
What's "fair" to you is almost certainly not what's "fair" to me, but we can each make an equally valid argument for our own particular perspective on it . . . which is why it's an utterly subjective word.
It's only subjective until two or more people find common ground, then 'fair' becomes an agreement. It helps if the parties enter the discussion with an actual goal of coming to an agreement. That's what makes politics so fun!