Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Here are the raw numbers straight the IRS.
NOT your fiction from blog.heritage.org that does not add up & says "ESTIMATED".
Here is the real chart that squares with reality from the IRS.
If the goal is to get everyone to pay higher taxes...which I guess is the point of the OP; we should go over the "cliff" I suppose.
Its all going to be okay. Don't worry.
Actually, that wasn't the point. The point is, the left (in their infinite stupidity) is literally crushing the successful with taxes while crying "you don't pay your fair share, we need to raise taxes".
The facts clearly prove otherwise. But then again, you guys always were adverse to the facts.
Crushing? Apple has $120B in cash in the bank. Google has billions as well. The health system I work for is opening 3 new campuses in the upcoming year. You're simply an idiot or seriously mis-informed.
As for "fair share", I think all of our taxes need to go up.
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need............."
How progressively communist... Parasites
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need............."
How progressively communist... Parasites
Stop lying. A progressive taxation does not eliminate inequality, far from it. At best, it can make the rich taking home only 10 times the average salary instead of 100s -- and the rich do not work 400 hours working week either.
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need............."
How progressively communist... Parasites
Stop lying. A progressive taxation does not eliminate inequality, far from it. At best, it can make the rich taking home only 10 times the average salary instead of 100s -- and the rich do not work 400 hours working week either.
Actually, that wasn't the point. The point is, the left (in their infinite stupidity) is literally crushing the successful with taxes while crying "you don't pay your fair share, we need to raise taxes".
The facts clearly prove otherwise. But then again, you guys always were adverse to the facts.
Crushing? Apple has $120B in cash in the bank. Google has billions as well. The health system I work for is opening 3 new campuses in the upcoming year. You're simply an idiot or seriously mis-informed.
As for "fair share", I think all of our taxes need to go up.
Once again we see the left citing corporate finance/taxes as their "evidence" for personal income tax on the wealthy...
Apple is publicly owned my dear. Google is also publicly owned my dear. Now, are you ready to admit you are wrong, or - at the very least - are you ready to compare "apples" to "apples"? (pun intended)
Here are the raw numbers straight the IRS.
NOT your fiction from blog.heritage.org that does not add up & says "ESTIMATED".
Here is the real chart that squares with reality from the IRS.
You're wrong.
PolitiFact Texas | Lamar Smith says top 20 percent of income earners pay nearly 70 percent of federal taxes
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need............."
How progressively communist... Parasites
Stop lying. A progressive taxation does not eliminate inequality, far from it. At best, it can make the rich taking home only 10 times the average salary instead of 100s -- and the rich do not work 400 hours working week either.
That's the flaw with socialist thinking.
You guys think earnings should be directly decided by hours worked.
Stop lying. A progressive taxation does not eliminate inequality, far from it. At best, it can make the rich taking home only 10 times the average salary instead of 100s -- and the rich do not work 400 hours working week either.
That's the flaw with socialist thinking.
You guys think earnings should be directly decided by hours worked.
And why that is not fair? You were talking horror stories about business owners burning midnight oil and seeing their kids once a year!
America has.
You're just babbling now.
If as you just claimed, the US solved its poverty problems by ending all benefits, why are you complaining about benefits?
Chris Gardner. Game over.
Don't try to avoid the facts. It's a true story. It happened. Homeless poverty to millionaire, all without the help of government. And all because he finally became uncomfortable in his poverty.
That's the flaw with socialist thinking.
You guys think earnings should be directly decided by hours worked.
And why that is not fair? You were talking horror stories about business owners burning midnight oil and seeing their kids once a year!
Because once a business man stops working and continues to profit from his previous work, socialists deem it "unfair."
And why that is not fair? You were talking horror stories about business owners burning midnight oil and seeing their kids once a year!
Because once a business man stops working and continues to profit from his previous work, socialists deem it "unfair."
No previous work can justify taking home 100s the average person income. Nobody works that much in their lifetime, that is why it is not fair.
Because once a business man stops working and continues to profit from his previous work, socialists deem it "unfair."
No previous work can justify taking home 100s the average person income. Nobody works that much in their lifetime, that is why it is not fair.
Do you think a man should be compensated based on the amount of work he produces?
That is what the progressive taxation is about -- the more income you earn, the larger share of it you have to pay in taxes. That how it works in every developed country.
And that is not unfair. We have to make it more progressive, not less.
No previous work can justify taking home 100s the average person income. Nobody works that much in their lifetime, that is why it is not fair.
Do you think a man should be compensated based on the amount of work he produces?
Define "amount of work".
I think a man should be compensated for his efforts. The problem is that the same efforts could lead to vastly different productivity.
A society should encourage higher productivity -- that is why we need a market based economy. But compensating people based solely on their productivity goes well beyond simply encouraging people to be as productive as they can, and, thus, leads to unnecessarily unfair compensation.
That is why we need progressive taxation -- so the resulting compensation is unfair just enough to encourage people to become more productive.
That is why we need progressive taxation -- so the resulting compensation is unfair just enough to encourage people to become more productive.
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need............."
How progressively communist... Parasites
Stop lying. A progressive taxation does not eliminate inequality, far from it. At best, it can make the rich taking home only 10 times the average salary instead of 100s -- and the rich do not work 400 hours working week either.
