Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
- Thread starter
- #61
That is all nonsense. By your logic there is no such thing as state's rights, because as the term is used,
those rights belong to state governments. If, as you claim, governments cannot have rights,
then state's rights can't exist.
Damn, you caught me, I don't believe in states having rights. They do, however, have constitutionally defined areas of responsibility that the federal government has usurped.
So maybe you should go back in time and tell the founders that the tenth amendment doesn't belong in the Bill of RIGHTS.
This one?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Don't see anything about rights there, do you?