Targets 1,500 km away in Russia are no problem now – Ukraine's Security Council Secretary

[toomuchtime_]

Ukraine has been working on its own missile programme and drones for a long time now, so hitting targets in Russian territory, even if they are located 1,500 km away, is no longer a problem, says Oleksii Danilov, Secretary of the National Security and Defence Council.

Source: Danilov on Ukrainian Radio

Quote: "The origin of the weapons being used on the territory of the Russian Federation is Ukrainian. There are two areas that have been under development for a certain period of time: the missile programme, which was approved back in 2020, aimed at creating our own Ukrainian missiles, and the use of unmanned aerial vehicles, [the production of which - ed.] is being deployed very extensively in our country today with the involvement of a large number of private companies."

Details: Danilov added that "all this will yield the appropriate results," because Ukrainian troops will now be able to hit targets located 700 or even 1,000-1,500 km away.



Danilov stressed, however, that Ukraine only attacks military facilities of the Russian Federation. The bombing of oil refineries or other facilities is the work of Russian partisans whom Ukraine does not control.

"We attack either factories or military production, i.e. the components that are killing our children. We must put an end to this," Danilov concluded.

Previously: Oleksii Danilov, Secretary of the National Security and Defence Council, posted a video showing successful tests of Ukrainian-made missile weapons.

Ministry of Defence, the media and OSINT researchers, and came to the conclusion that since the beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion, Ukrainian special services and armed forces may have carried out at least nine successful attacks on airbases in Russian regions, temporarily occupied Crimea and Belarus, and destroyed or damaged at least 24 aircraft.

・Journalists also estimate that there have been over 190 drone attacks on the territory of Russia and temporarily occupied Crimea since the beginning of the year. The strikes carried out on the night of 29-30 August in six regions of the Russian Federation were the most extensive in 2023.

MSN

Everyday we see the Ukrainians grow stronger, and everyday we see the Russians grow weaker.

 

[Esdraelon]

Anyone who expects a Russian leader - Putin or any other - to accept defeat and the loss of Crimea, is a fool. Nothing personal, but that's at the very heart of the Russian psyche. It would utterly destroy their image of themselves and they will not accept that. Nukes? Oh yeah, they'd use them before they'd admit defeat. Especially a defeat that left NATO in control of Sevastopol and a NATO fleet on Russia's border. These war cheerleaders need to wake up before those funny-shaped clouds start blooming around our countries.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Anyone who expects a Russian leader - Putin or any other - to accept defeat and the loss of Crimea, is a fool. Nothing personal, but that's at the very heart of the Russian psyche. It would utterly destroy their image of themselves and they will not accept that. Nukes? Oh yeah, they'd use them before they'd admit defeat. Especially a defeat that left NATO in control of Sevastopol and a NATO fleet on Russia's border. These war cheerleaders need to wake up before those funny-shaped clouds start blooming around our countries.

Well, Ukraine has made it clear that it intends to liberate Crimea and just now the odds are looking good that it can, so when you peruse your nuclear fantasies, just what do you see Russia nuking?

 

[theHawk]

Well, Ukraine has made it clear that it intends to liberate Crimea and just now the odds are looking good that it can, so when you peruse your nuclear fantasies, just what do you see Russia nuking?

Ukraine is following the orders of the warmongers in Washington. The people there could care less about being slaughtered trying to take Crimea away from the Russians, who have had it since the 1770’s when they built the port.

Crimea, along with eastern parts of Ukraine, were made part of the Ukrainian SSR state by Communist dictators. So why are we pretending these borders represent a nation? They do not.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Ukraine is following the orders of the warmongers in Washington. The people there could care less about being slaughtered trying to take Crimea away from the Russians, who have had it since the 1770’s when they built the port.

Crimea, along with eastern parts of Ukraine, were made part of the Ukrainian SSR state by Communist dictators. So why are we pretending these borders represent a nation? They do not.

Well, the rest of the world thinks these borders are the legal borders of Ukraine and Russia must leave. So this issue has already been settled: there is you and Trump and Putin on one side and the rest of the world on the other side. The question now is, can Russia stop Ukraine from taking back Crimea?

 

[theHawk]

Well, the rest of the world thinks these borders are the legal borders of Ukraine and Russia must leave. So this issue has already been settled: there is you and Trump and Putin on one side and the rest of the world on the other side. The question now is, can Russia stop Ukraine from taking back Crimea?

The “rest of the world“ doesn’t give a shit. They aren’t the ones dying in the war and they aren’t paying for it, except for greatly increased energy prices.

I love how this is your excuse for a war. You can’t refute the stupid way these borders were made, but since all the globalists and media who are bought and paid for keep regurgitating Washington talking points, you actually think that people are willing to die to try to kick Russia out of Crimea.

I notice you cowards aren’t flying to Ukraine to join Zelensky’s legions to fight Russia. But you will sit here and lecture us that we must support a war that is getting hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians killed.

 

[toomuchtime_]

The “rest of the world“ doesn’t give a shit. They aren’t the ones dying in the war and they aren’t paying for it, except for greatly increased energy prices.

I love how this is your excuse for a war. You can’t refute the stupid way these borders were made, but since all the globalists and media who are bought and paid for keep regurgitating Washington talking points, you actually think that people are willing to die to try to kick Russia out of Crimea.

I notice you cowards aren’t flying to Ukraine to join Zelensky’s legions to fight Russia. But you will sit here and lecture us that we must support a war that is getting hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians killed.

You are the one lecturing. I'm just pointing out to you that everyone has already made their minds about Ukraine's borders and now the only relevant question is, can Russia stop Ukraine for taking back Crimea.

Try to keep up.

 

[Kruska]

Well, Ukraine has made it clear that it intends to liberate Crimea and just now the odds are looking good that it can, so when you peruse your nuclear fantasies, just what do you see Russia nuking?

Take a guess - nitwit

 

[Kruska]

Well, the rest of the world thinks these borders are the legal borders of Ukraine and Russia must leave. So this issue has already been settled: there is you and Trump and Putin on one side and the rest of the world on the other side. The question now is, can Russia stop Ukraine from taking back Crimea?

Since when has the "legality" of the border ever been an issue?
Putin's justification towards Crimea is a matter that concerns the UN and it's international court. So is the peoples will in regards to Crimea, Dombas and Luhansk.
Putin's occupation of these territories factually allows for a plebiscite - under UN supervision, that before was denied by facist Ukraine.

As such it's a FACT, if you like it or not, Putin is the ultimate promoter towards a real democracy, were people via a plebiscite can now decide.

 

[luiza]

Looks like Winkle the Titty is slowly leaving us and they have sent in Boozey to try and do a better Troll job .
The Pskov missiles came from thev Baltic Sea -- just over 40 miles from target . Not 750 .
The whole subject is Deflection becasuse Russia is making huge advances on the eastern front and over the last three days the Kyiv Nazis have lost over 5000 troops and at minimum over twice the average recent figure since the great Meat Grinder event at Bakhmut .-- typically ca. 700 a day when the normal scenario is attrition .

 

[toomuchtime_]

Take a guess - nitwit

How can I know who Putin will nuke in your fantasies?

 

[toomuchtime_]

Since when has the "legality" of the border ever been an issue?
Putin's justification towards Crimea is a matter that concerns the UN and it's international court. So is the peoples will in regards to Crimea, Dombas and Luhansk.
Putin's occupation of these territories factually allows for a plebiscite - under UN supervision, that before was denied by facist Ukraine.

As such it's a FACT, if you like it or not, Putin is the ultimate promoter towards a real democracy, were people via a plebiscite can now decide.

So you're answer to the question, can Russia stop Ukraine for taking back Crimea, would seem to be, no.

 

[theHawk]

So you're answer to the question, can Russia stop Ukraine for taking back Crimea, would seem to be, no.

If that was true, then why doesn’t Ukraine have it now?

 

[toomuchtime_]

If that was true, then why doesn’t Ukraine have it now?

In your typically confused, twisted manner, you seem to be answering the question, can Russia stop Ukraine from retaking Crimea, by saying, yes, you think it can. Clearly, Ukraine is goung to try, so we will soon know if you are correct.

 

[theHawk]

In your typically confused, twisted manner, you seem to be answering the question, can Russia stop Ukraine from retaking Crimea, by saying, yes, you think it can. Clearly, Ukraine is goung to try, so we will soon know if you are correct.

Bookmarking this thread.

 

[Ringo]

This was not reported by the russian media or the Ministry of Defense, but by a british politician, the leader of the Heritage Party