Susan "Unmasking" Rice Refuses to Testify

[JimBowie1958]

This is like the 3rd or 4th shit stain staff member who has refused to testify. If we did that our ass would be in jail. I think it's time we demanded equality in criminal prosecution!

The GOP leadership in Congress does not have the balls to indict a single Democrat EVER.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is like the 3rd or 4th shit stain staff member who has refused to testify. If we did that our ass would be in jail. I think it's time we demanded equality in criminal prosecution!

The GOP leadership in Congress does not have the balls to indict a single Democrat EVER.

View attachment 124672

The name Lisa Lerner comes to mind....as does Hillary Clinton.

"Go along to get along" appears to be their motto.

 

[BULLDOG]

This is like the 3rd or 4th shit stain staff member who has refused to testify. If we did that our ass would be in jail. I think it's time we demanded equality in criminal prosecution!

Why should they voluntarily be used as a distraction for the repubs? What do you think she might have to add to that investigation?

Her on the record under oath testimony you fucking moron.

Exactly. No particular bit of information that might better inform the investigation, but if the right could just get something from her under oath, they could kick in their witch hunt process and make something out of it, no matter how hard they had to twist and misrepresent her words. Great way to muddy the water and distract from all the Trump/Russian connections that are so obvious.

 

[BULLDOG]

Republicans only want her there as a distraction from Trump's connections to russian spies.

Care to post some evidence of those "connections"?

Not a problem.I guess Fox forgot to mention all of this.
Trump campaign’s Russia ties: Who’s involved

Fake news bullshit, Flynn did an interview for RT (the horror) and he wasn't yet a member of the Trump campaign at the time.

Really? Why did Trump fire him, then?

 

[BULLDOG]

Republicans only want her there as a distraction from Trump's connections to russian spies.

There was no connection and no collusion, the closest you have is Flynn doing an interview for RT which broadcasts in the US and he wasn't even a member of the campaign at the time you dumb fuck. We want her testimony regarding illegal spying conducted by the Obama administration on the opposition Presidential candidate.

You want a distraction.

 

[BULLDOG]

Republicans only want her there as a distraction from Trump's connections to russian spies.

Care to post some evidence of those "connections"?

Nail on the head, S.J.....of course there are no such connections.

But.....there are these:


The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.
The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.
"52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"
52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™


Here's why:
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
The first Republican President


And this:
"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html


And

"Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"
Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance




Now....where are the 'investigations'?????

You realize all that crap has been proven to be bullshit. right?

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

This is like the 3rd or 4th shit stain staff member who has refused to testify. If we did that our ass would be in jail. I think it's time we demanded equality in criminal prosecution!

Why should they voluntarily be used as a distraction for the repubs? What do you think she might have to add to that investigation?

Her on the record under oath testimony you fucking moron.

Exactly. No particular bit of information that might better inform the investigation, but if the right could just get something from her under oath, they could kick in their witch hunt process and make something out of it, no matter how hard they had to twist and misrepresent her words. Great way to muddy the water and distract from all the Trump/Russian connections that are so obvious.

There is no connection between Trump and the Russian government, show me the pay stub you lying sack of shit. The issue and the only issue of criminality is on the part of the Obama administration spying on the oppositions political candidate, so of course you don't want these criminal scum put under oath.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Republicans only want her there as a distraction from Trump's connections to russian spies.

Care to post some evidence of those "connections"?

Nail on the head, S.J.....of course there are no such connections.

But.....there are these:


The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.
The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.
"52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"
52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™


Here's why:
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
The first Republican President


And this:
"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html


And

"Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"
Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance




Now....where are the 'investigations'?????

You realize all that crap has been proven to be bullshit. right?

I realize you are a lying piece of shit.

 

[westwall]

Republicans only want her there as a distraction from Trump's connections to russian spies.

Care to post some evidence of those "connections"?

Not a problem.I guess Fox forgot to mention all of this.
Trump campaign’s Russia ties: Who’s involved

What's funny, and which you seem to ignore is they all are connected with the shrilary even more. But what the heck, it's the shrilary so it doesn't count. Right bodey?

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Republicans only want her there as a distraction from Trump's connections to russian spies.

There was no connection and no collusion, the closest you have is Flynn doing an interview for RT which broadcasts in the US and he wasn't even a member of the campaign at the time you dumb fuck. We want her testimony regarding illegal spying conducted by the Obama administration on the opposition Presidential candidate.

You want a distraction.

There's nothing to distract from, the only criminal issue is the Obama administration using intelligence agencies to illegally spy on the oppositions Presidential candidate just like they used the IRS and DHS to target tea party groups you fucking scumbag.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Republicans only want her there as a distraction from Trump's connections to russian spies.

Care to post some evidence of those "connections"?

Not a problem.I guess Fox forgot to mention all of this.
Trump campaign’s Russia ties: Who’s involved

Fake news bullshit, Flynn did an interview for RT (the horror) and he wasn't yet a member of the Trump campaign at the time.

Really? Why did Trump fire him, then?

For lying to Pence, why did Obama actors commit a felony and leak his name?

 

[BULLDOG]

Republicans only want her there as a distraction from Trump's connections to russian spies.

Care to post some evidence of those "connections"?

Not a problem.I guess Fox forgot to mention all of this.
Trump campaign’s Russia ties: Who’s involved

What's funny, and which you seem to ignore is they all are connected with the shrilary even more. But what the heck, it's the shrilary so it doesn't count. Right bodey?

You won. You elected that obese orange clown. Why are you still whining about your defeated foe when you should be so busy WINNING? I'm really impressed with all your success in ending gay marriage, Banning Muslims, Building that Beautiful wall that Mexico will pay for, Repealing and replacing Obamacare, and all the other things the right has successfully done like Trump promised would be done in the first 100 days. Who knew healthcare would be complicated?

I just have 1 little question. Since that healthcare bill they say they will vote on today has changed in the last day or two, and it hasn't been scored, and Nobody has had time to read the modified bill, is the house going to have to pass it in order to see what's in it?

 

[BULLDOG]

Republicans only want her there as a distraction from Trump's connections to russian spies.

There was no connection and no collusion, the closest you have is Flynn doing an interview for RT which broadcasts in the US and he wasn't even a member of the campaign at the time you dumb fuck. We want her testimony regarding illegal spying conducted by the Obama administration on the opposition Presidential candidate.

You want a distraction.

There's nothing to distract from, the only criminal issue is the Obama administration using intelligence agencies to illegally spy on the oppositions Presidential candidate just like they used the IRS and DHS to target tea party groups you fucking scumbag.

I guess that's all fox told you about, but the range of investigation is much wider than that.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Republicans only want her there as a distraction from Trump's connections to russian spies.

There was no connection and no collusion, the closest you have is Flynn doing an interview for RT which broadcasts in the US and he wasn't even a member of the campaign at the time you dumb fuck. We want her testimony regarding illegal spying conducted by the Obama administration on the opposition Presidential candidate.

You want a distraction.

There's nothing to distract from, the only criminal issue is the Obama administration using intelligence agencies to illegally spy on the oppositions Presidential candidate just like they used the IRS and DHS to target tea party groups you fucking scumbag.

I guess that's all fox told you about, but the range of investigation is much wider than that.

You still can't even provide evidence that Russia was behind the hacking let alone that Trump colluded with them. Fyi the unsubstantiated claim of Obama's CIA is not evidence.

 

[BULLDOG]

Republicans only want her there as a distraction from Trump's connections to russian spies.

There was no connection and no collusion, the closest you have is Flynn doing an interview for RT which broadcasts in the US and he wasn't even a member of the campaign at the time you dumb fuck. We want her testimony regarding illegal spying conducted by the Obama administration on the opposition Presidential candidate.

You want a distraction.

There's nothing to distract from, the only criminal issue is the Obama administration using intelligence agencies to illegally spy on the oppositions Presidential candidate just like they used the IRS and DHS to target tea party groups you fucking scumbag.

I guess that's all fox told you about, but the range of investigation is much wider than that.

You still can't even provide evidence that Russia was behind the hacking let alone that Trump colluded with them. Fyi the unsubstantiated claim of Obama's CIA is not evidence.

If you take the word of Alex Jones over the CIA, you are too crazy for me to communicate with.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

There was no connection and no collusion, the closest you have is Flynn doing an interview for RT which broadcasts in the US and he wasn't even a member of the campaign at the time you dumb fuck. We want her testimony regarding illegal spying conducted by the Obama administration on the opposition Presidential candidate.

You want a distraction.

There's nothing to distract from, the only criminal issue is the Obama administration using intelligence agencies to illegally spy on the oppositions Presidential candidate just like they used the IRS and DHS to target tea party groups you fucking scumbag.

I guess that's all fox told you about, but the range of investigation is much wider than that.

You still can't even provide evidence that Russia was behind the hacking let alone that Trump colluded with them. Fyi the unsubstantiated claim of Obama's CIA is not evidence.

If you take the word of Alex Jones over the CIA, you are too crazy for me to communicate with.

You are the one believing conspiracy theories without a scrap of evidence, Ive been debunking Alex Jones since back in his twoofer days when you were still probably jerking off to loose change because a Republican was in the White House.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Republicans only want her there as a distraction from Trump's connections to russian spies.

Care to post some evidence of those "connections"?

Nail on the head, S.J.....of course there are no such connections.

But.....there are these:


The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.
The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.
"52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"
52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™


Here's why:
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
The first Republican President


And this:
"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html


And

"Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"
Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance




Now....where are the 'investigations'?????

You realize all that crap has been proven to be bullshit. right?

I realize you are a lying piece of shit.

I won't use that language, but certainly second that sentiment.

 

[Dragonlady]

This is like the 3rd or 4th shit stain staff member who has refused to testify. If we did that our ass would be in jail. I think it's time we demanded equality in criminal prosecution!

The GOP leadership in Congress does not have the balls to indict a single Democrat EVER.

View attachment 124672

That's because Republicans make up allegations and then go on snipe hunts trying to prove their lies aren't lies - like Benghazi or the Clinton Foundation's purported pay for play, or Hillary selling uranium to Putin. None of these things happened, they were just Republican wet dreams.

But you believe they happened - all evidence to the contrary. No amount of evidence that they didn't will deter you in that belief.

There is evidence that Flynn took money from Turkey, even though, as a retired general he was told not to accept money from foreign governments. There is also evidence that he talked to Russia about removing sanctions imposed by Obama - in violation of US law, all of which Flynn admitted when he was fired.

But you believe Hillary is a criminal despite no evidence and deny that Flynn should be locked up despite his confession.

There is no cure for stupid.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Susan Rice won't testify before Senate

Well, that is her choice. If they want her testimony that badly, they can subpoena her.

. And they should.

Susan Rice won't testify before Senate

Well, that is her choice. If they want her testimony that badly, they can subpoena her.

They will.

If and when they do, that'll be that. She'll either show up or she won't.

 

[bodecea]

So...the OP title says that Susan Rice refuses to testify.....and yet, I understand that she is willing to testify if it is a closed session. So, is the OP a lie?