Susan Rice ‘Not Qualified’ Says The Man Who Picked Sarah Palin For VP

I would pick Palin over Biden any day of the week, but what does this have to do with Rice's qualifications?
 
I see. None of them fit your narrative so....:blahblah::blahblah::blahblah:

It's also about temperament. If there's ANYONE who recently served as a diplomat and was ill-suited to the role based on personality and temperament, it was John Bolton.

Rice obviously has both the temperament AND the educational background, AND the professional work history to serve both as UN ambassador AND US Secretary of State.

Palin has none of that. In fact, she routinely takes public comments personally to such an extent that she lashes out...even at comedians. That makes her a poor fit to work with other people from other countries and cultures who have their own agendas which must be understood in an effort to find common ground.

Why the obsession with Palin? No one is talking about her. She played a very diminished role after the primaries and you have a boner for her all morning.

Here's some BREAKING NEWS...many Republicans/Conservatives don't give a shit about her. She's old news that.... you can't seem to let go of.

Palin is mentioned in the OP, genius.
 
It's also about temperament. If there's ANYONE who recently served as a diplomat and was ill-suited to the role based on personality and temperament, it was John Bolton.

Rice obviously has both the temperament AND the educational background, AND the professional work history to serve both as UN ambassador AND US Secretary of State.

Palin has none of that. In fact, she routinely takes public comments personally to such an extent that she lashes out...even at comedians. That makes her a poor fit to work with other people from other countries and cultures who have their own agendas which must be understood in an effort to find common ground.

Why the obsession with Palin? No one is talking about her. She played a very diminished role after the primaries and you have a boner for her all morning.

Here's some BREAKING NEWS...many Republicans/Conservatives don't give a shit about her. She's old news that.... you can't seem to let go of.

Palin is mentioned in the OP, genius.


Look to... why and how she's mentioned. Not as relevant to today's or tomorrow's GOP.
 
Why Democrats mask Susan Rice incompetence with white racism charge





Nearly 2 months ago, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice appeared on 5 national news Sunday talk shows selling a lie which covered up the truth of the murders of four Americans at the Benghazi consulate in Libya. The administration lies have taken on their own life, and on Thursday, November 15th the republican senators demanded answers.

Yes, it does matter that Ambassador Rice covered up the lie about a You Tube video being the reason for the attack on the Benghazi Consulate. The administration it knew to be a lie. It was a fiction that President Obama knew was a lie, and avoided telling the truth about. It was a lie that Obama's former CIA Director David Petraeus knew as a lie 24 hours after the deadly 9/11 attack. Yet, Susan Rice never offered even a scintilla of evidence about an Al Qaeda attack being the reason for the assassination of Americans.

So why go back to the same card game with Americans. Why the double racial standard?

Why do congresswomen like Cleveland, Ohio congresswoman Marcia Fudge, incoming chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus feel it is necessary to state, " It's a shame that whenever anything goes wrong they pick on women and minorities!"

The answer is clear.

The politics of racism practiced by liberals, by the president, and by white guilt ridden apologists is that they need America to continue to be divided. They are now the true racists in an America that has moved on. This nation now has a president who is black. Americans believe that job security, an approaching fiscal cliff and crushing debt is more important than finding imagined racist boogiemen hiding in America's dark corners.

Susan Rice does not need to be defended on the basis of her race or on her gender. Susan Rice as any other administration official that plays footloose with the facts concerning the deaths of Americans must be held accountable. There is no two-tier level of responsibility. American does not have nor need a racial Affirmative Action type of imagined protection for minorities or for women.

If Congresswoman Fudge is so concerned about protecting women who are being subjected to discrimination, not gaze into Obama's mirror? After all, it is not senators McCain, Graham, or Ayotte, who are discriminating against women. It is the hope and change President Obama, openly discriminates against women and embraces the "do as I say and not as I do" rule. Women are paid up to 17 percent than their male counterparts in the White House!

So liberals and Congressional Black Caucus women, stop this nonsense about racism when the only problem of racism that seems to exist in this nation is a continued embrace of the race card. How about working toward the day when a Congressional Black Caucus is not necessary. What about demanding that public officials that lie to America and engage in indefensible incompetent behavior answer to it.

The truth, not fiction, is essential and must be investigated and the results placed before the American public. It's simple, race and gender is no defense against the truth. It is about the truth, and nothing but the truth.

This is the 12st century. In the final analysis, America needs to know that when its sends its sons and daughters to fight a war or to place their lives in danger for this nation, their president will not cover up, will not deceive and will not ignore their sacrifice.

So, Susan Rice come forward and be a woman, and not hide from your conduct or let a president beat his chest like a prehistoric cave man protecting his women from the big bad imaginary republican dinosaurs. After all, hopefully Obama did not nominate you as a black woman for a job. Hopefully he nominated you as a woman capable of doing your job and defending your conduct on your own.

Reject the race card being played in your name, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, so that America can move onto matters which impact all Americans, colorblind and one nation under God.

Why Democrats mask Susan Rice incompetence with white racism charge

My theory of the 'case' is simple and doesn't require conspiracies and lies. The video had embroiled the Muslim World (fact). A small group of terrorists, armed and wanting to prove their manhood (not unlike small groups in the United States) saw an opportunity to kill others they hated and acted on it.

Hindsight is almost always 20-20; of course the willfully ignorant remain myopic under all conditions., McCain and Graham each have something to prove; Lindsey that he is a man, Johnny that he is still relevant.
 
Why Democrats mask Susan Rice incompetence with white racism charge





Nearly 2 months ago, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice appeared on 5 national news Sunday talk shows selling a lie which covered up the truth of the murders of four Americans at the Benghazi consulate in Libya. The administration lies have taken on their own life, and on Thursday, November 15th the republican senators demanded answers.

Yes, it does matter that Ambassador Rice covered up the lie about a You Tube video being the reason for the attack on the Benghazi Consulate. The administration it knew to be a lie. It was a fiction that President Obama knew was a lie, and avoided telling the truth about. It was a lie that Obama's former CIA Director David Petraeus knew as a lie 24 hours after the deadly 9/11 attack. Yet, Susan Rice never offered even a scintilla of evidence about an Al Qaeda attack being the reason for the assassination of Americans.

So why go back to the same card game with Americans. Why the double racial standard?

Why do congresswomen like Cleveland, Ohio congresswoman Marcia Fudge, incoming chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus feel it is necessary to state, " It's a shame that whenever anything goes wrong they pick on women and minorities!"

The answer is clear.

The politics of racism practiced by liberals, by the president, and by white guilt ridden apologists is that they need America to continue to be divided. They are now the true racists in an America that has moved on. This nation now has a president who is black. Americans believe that job security, an approaching fiscal cliff and crushing debt is more important than finding imagined racist boogiemen hiding in America's dark corners.

Susan Rice does not need to be defended on the basis of her race or on her gender. Susan Rice as any other administration official that plays footloose with the facts concerning the deaths of Americans must be held accountable. There is no two-tier level of responsibility. American does not have nor need a racial Affirmative Action type of imagined protection for minorities or for women.

If Congresswoman Fudge is so concerned about protecting women who are being subjected to discrimination, not gaze into Obama's mirror? After all, it is not senators McCain, Graham, or Ayotte, who are discriminating against women. It is the hope and change President Obama, openly discriminates against women and embraces the "do as I say and not as I do" rule. Women are paid up to 17 percent than their male counterparts in the White House!

So liberals and Congressional Black Caucus women, stop this nonsense about racism when the only problem of racism that seems to exist in this nation is a continued embrace of the race card. How about working toward the day when a Congressional Black Caucus is not necessary. What about demanding that public officials that lie to America and engage in indefensible incompetent behavior answer to it.

The truth, not fiction, is essential and must be investigated and the results placed before the American public. It's simple, race and gender is no defense against the truth. It is about the truth, and nothing but the truth.

This is the 12st century. In the final analysis, America needs to know that when its sends its sons and daughters to fight a war or to place their lives in danger for this nation, their president will not cover up, will not deceive and will not ignore their sacrifice.

So, Susan Rice come forward and be a woman, and not hide from your conduct or let a president beat his chest like a prehistoric cave man protecting his women from the big bad imaginary republican dinosaurs. After all, hopefully Obama did not nominate you as a black woman for a job. Hopefully he nominated you as a woman capable of doing your job and defending your conduct on your own.

Reject the race card being played in your name, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, so that America can move onto matters which impact all Americans, colorblind and one nation under God.

Why Democrats mask Susan Rice incompetence with white racism charge

My theory of the 'case' is simple and doesn't require conspiracies and lies. The video had embroiled the Muslim World (fact). A small group of terrorists, armed and wanting to prove their manhood (not unlike small groups in the United States) saw an opportunity to kill others they hated and acted on it. Hindsight is almost always 20-20; of course the willfully ignorant remain myopic under all conditions., McCain and Graham each have something to prove; Lindsey that he is a man, Johnny that he is still relevant.

I noticed you cleverly and wisely did not directly link the two in your reply like she did whether instructed to or of her own volition.

Sometimes people get caught up in circumstances not of their own creation.
 
Last edited:
Why Democrats mask Susan Rice incompetence with white racism charge





Nearly 2 months ago, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice appeared on 5 national news Sunday talk shows selling a lie which covered up the truth of the murders of four Americans at the Benghazi consulate in Libya. The administration lies have taken on their own life, and on Thursday, November 15th the republican senators demanded answers.

Yes, it does matter that Ambassador Rice covered up the lie about a You Tube video being the reason for the attack on the Benghazi Consulate. The administration it knew to be a lie. It was a fiction that President Obama knew was a lie, and avoided telling the truth about. It was a lie that Obama's former CIA Director David Petraeus knew as a lie 24 hours after the deadly 9/11 attack. Yet, Susan Rice never offered even a scintilla of evidence about an Al Qaeda attack being the reason for the assassination of Americans.

So why go back to the same card game with Americans. Why the double racial standard?

Why do congresswomen like Cleveland, Ohio congresswoman Marcia Fudge, incoming chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus feel it is necessary to state, " It's a shame that whenever anything goes wrong they pick on women and minorities!"

The answer is clear.

The politics of racism practiced by liberals, by the president, and by white guilt ridden apologists is that they need America to continue to be divided. They are now the true racists in an America that has moved on. This nation now has a president who is black. Americans believe that job security, an approaching fiscal cliff and crushing debt is more important than finding imagined racist boogiemen hiding in America's dark corners.

Susan Rice does not need to be defended on the basis of her race or on her gender. Susan Rice as any other administration official that plays footloose with the facts concerning the deaths of Americans must be held accountable. There is no two-tier level of responsibility. American does not have nor need a racial Affirmative Action type of imagined protection for minorities or for women.

If Congresswoman Fudge is so concerned about protecting women who are being subjected to discrimination, not gaze into Obama's mirror? After all, it is not senators McCain, Graham, or Ayotte, who are discriminating against women. It is the hope and change President Obama, openly discriminates against women and embraces the "do as I say and not as I do" rule. Women are paid up to 17 percent than their male counterparts in the White House!

So liberals and Congressional Black Caucus women, stop this nonsense about racism when the only problem of racism that seems to exist in this nation is a continued embrace of the race card. How about working toward the day when a Congressional Black Caucus is not necessary. What about demanding that public officials that lie to America and engage in indefensible incompetent behavior answer to it.

The truth, not fiction, is essential and must be investigated and the results placed before the American public. It's simple, race and gender is no defense against the truth. It is about the truth, and nothing but the truth.

This is the 12st century. In the final analysis, America needs to know that when its sends its sons and daughters to fight a war or to place their lives in danger for this nation, their president will not cover up, will not deceive and will not ignore their sacrifice.

So, Susan Rice come forward and be a woman, and not hide from your conduct or let a president beat his chest like a prehistoric cave man protecting his women from the big bad imaginary republican dinosaurs. After all, hopefully Obama did not nominate you as a black woman for a job. Hopefully he nominated you as a woman capable of doing your job and defending your conduct on your own.

Reject the race card being played in your name, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, so that America can move onto matters which impact all Americans, colorblind and one nation under God.

Why Democrats mask Susan Rice incompetence with white racism charge

My theory of the 'case' is simple and doesn't require conspiracies and lies. The video had embroiled the Muslim World (fact). A small group of terrorists, armed and wanting to prove their manhood (not unlike small groups in the United States) saw an opportunity to kill others they hated and acted on it. Hindsight is almost always 20-20; of course the willfully ignorant remain myopic under all conditions., McCain and Graham each have something to prove; Lindsey that he is a man, Johnny that he is still relevant.

I noticed you cleverly and wisely did not directly link the two in your reply like she idd whether instructed to or of her own volition.

Ask a question in a standard English sentence. Yours is missing something.


Sometimes people get cuaght up in circumstances not of their own creation.

That is true, again, put in the object to the sentence and maybe I can respond to the specific issue.
 
My theory of the 'case' is simple and doesn't require conspiracies and lies. The video had embroiled the Muslim World (fact). A small group of terrorists, armed and wanting to prove their manhood (not unlike small groups in the United States) saw an opportunity to kill others they hated and acted on it. Hindsight is almost always 20-20; of course the willfully ignorant remain myopic under all conditions., McCain and Graham each have something to prove; Lindsey that he is a man, Johnny that he is still relevant.

I noticed you cleverly and wisely did not directly link the two in your reply like she idd whether instructed to or of her own volition.

Ask a question in a standard English sentence. Yours is missing something.


Sometimes people get cuaght up in circumstances not of their own creation.

That is true, again, put in the object to the sentence and maybe I can respond to the specific issue.

There's no issue that I need a response to but thanks for the offer.
 
John McCain has his friggin' nerve. He is just a bitter, sore loser.

In the height of irony or, perhaps more accurate, hubris, Senator John McCain, the man who rushed the insufficiently vetted and profoundly unqualified Sarah Palin to the status of VP candidate (aka, “a heartbeat away from the presidency”), took to the podium today to denigrate and denounce the highly respected U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Susan Rice for being “not qualified.”

For the man who inflicted the “not very bright” Ms. Palin upon the electorate, there appears to be an extreme disconnect at play here. One doesn’t necessarily want to drag the 2008 campaign into the discussion, certainly not when much of it was an embarrassing display of political ineptitude and arrogance embodied by a vice-presidential candidate who was in so far over her head, it’s possible she’s still not breathing air, but McCain’s personal slams on Rice reeks of tunnel vision. Or, as one pundit suggested, old wounds with Obama over that 2008 campaign.

Susan Rice

View attachment 22680

Sarah Palin was never involved in a massive coverup--Susan Rice is--albeit the coverup is not her fault--she (ironically instead of the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) was sent out to 5 different talk shows on one weekend to talk about some unknown--remote youtube video and just ended up as being a puppet in the coverup of Bengazi.

Ironically--if she is nominated to be the next secretary of State--she is going to get GRILLED on Bengazi--the 5 talk show comments under sworn testimony. IOW--Democrats will NOT nominate a person to higher office that was involved in a scandal--because she will be thrown right under the congressional micro-scope with her testimony. So if anyone has ruined her career--it is Barack Obama who did it.

Obama ADMITTED she had nothing to do with Bengazi--but sent her out there anyway.
 
Last edited:
John McCain has his friggin' nerve. He is just a bitter, sore loser.

In the height of irony or, perhaps more accurate, hubris, Senator John McCain, the man who rushed the insufficiently vetted and profoundly unqualified Sarah Palin to the status of VP candidate (aka, “a heartbeat away from the presidency”), took to the podium today to denigrate and denounce the highly respected U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Susan Rice for being “not qualified.”

For the man who inflicted the “not very bright” Ms. Palin upon the electorate, there appears to be an extreme disconnect at play here. One doesn’t necessarily want to drag the 2008 campaign into the discussion, certainly not when much of it was an embarrassing display of political ineptitude and arrogance embodied by a vice-presidential candidate who was in so far over her head, it’s possible she’s still not breathing air, but McCain’s personal slams on Rice reeks of tunnel vision. Or, as one pundit suggested, old wounds with Obama over that 2008 campaign.

Susan Rice

View attachment 22680

Sarah Palin was never involved in a massive coverup--Susan Rice is--albeit the coverup is not her fault--she (ironically instead of the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) was sent out to 5 different talk shows on one weekend to talk about some unknown--remote youtube video to and was just a puppet in the coverup of Bengazi.

Ironically--if she is nominated to be the next secretary of State--she is going to get GRILLED on Bengazi--the 5 talk show comments. IOW--Democrats will NOT nominate a person to higher office that was involved in a scandal--because she will be thrown right under the congressional micro-scope with her testimony. So if anyone has ruined her career--it is Barack Obama who did it.

Obama ADMITTED she had nothing to do with Bengazi--but sent her out there anyway.



She'll never get confirmed unless the GOP collapses. Which, is a distinct poissibility since they are so weak willed in standing up for themselves.

If Obama really wanted to reach across the aisle he would drop the idea. Sometimes good people get caught up in bad situations.

Rather than forment debate and resentment, here's an opportunity for Obama to unite, not divide.


Wanna guess which way he goes....
 
Last edited:
Susan Rice ‘Not Qualified’ Says The Man Who Picked Sarah Palin For VP

Let us know when Rice becomes a mayor and governor..Instead of some appointed position in this clown administration
Rice doesn't even seem qualified for the position she has

Could you give us some examples of how she is unqualified?

She's proven she's qualified for whatever position Obama gives her.....

She'll say ANYTHING she's told to, whether it's the truth or not!
 
I repeat:

She'll never get confirmed unless the GOP collapses. Which, is a distinct poissibility since they are so weak willed in standing up for themselves.

If Obama really wanted to reach across the aisle he would drop the idea. Sometimes good people get caught up in bad situations.

Rather than forment debate and resentment, here's an opportunity for Obama to unite, not divide.



Wanna guess which way he goes....
 
I noticed you cleverly and wisely did not directly link the two in your reply like she idd whether instructed to or of her own volition.

Ask a question in a standard English sentence. Yours is missing something.


Sometimes people get cuaght up in circumstances not of their own creation.

That is true, again, put in the object to the sentence and maybe I can respond to the specific issue.

There's no issue that I need a response to but thanks for the offer.

I see.
 
Susan Rice ‘Not Qualified’ Says The Man Who Picked Sarah Palin For VP

Let us know when Rice becomes a mayor and governor..Instead of some appointed position in this clown administration
Rice doesn't even seem qualified for the position she has

You're right. Condoleezza Rice was never a mayor or a governor.

that isn't what I was saying, but if you must..
I was talking of the experience of Palin since that is what this thread is about
 
John McCain has his friggin' nerve. He is just a bitter, sore loser.

In the height of irony or, perhaps more accurate, hubris, Senator John McCain, the man who rushed the insufficiently vetted and profoundly unqualified Sarah Palin to the status of VP candidate (aka, “a heartbeat away from the presidency”), took to the podium today to denigrate and denounce the highly respected U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Susan Rice for being “not qualified.”

For the man who inflicted the “not very bright” Ms. Palin upon the electorate, there appears to be an extreme disconnect at play here. One doesn’t necessarily want to drag the 2008 campaign into the discussion, certainly not when much of it was an embarrassing display of political ineptitude and arrogance embodied by a vice-presidential candidate who was in so far over her head, it’s possible she’s still not breathing air, but McCain’s personal slams on Rice reeks of tunnel vision. Or, as one pundit suggested, old wounds with Obama over that 2008 campaign.

Susan Rice

View attachment 22680

Sarah Palin was never involved in a massive coverup--Susan Rice is--albeit the coverup is not her fault--she (ironically instead of the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) was sent out to 5 different talk shows on one weekend to talk about some unknown--remote youtube video to and was just a puppet in the coverup of Bengazi.

Ironically--if she is nominated to be the next secretary of State--she is going to get GRILLED on Bengazi--the 5 talk show comments. IOW--Democrats will NOT nominate a person to higher office that was involved in a scandal--because she will be thrown right under the congressional micro-scope with her testimony. So if anyone has ruined her career--it is Barack Obama who did it.

Obama ADMITTED she had nothing to do with Bengazi--but sent her out there anyway.



She'll never get confirmed unless the GOP collapses. Which, is a distinct poissibility since they are so weak willed in standing up for themselves.

If Obama really wanted to reach across the aisle he would drop the idea. Sometimes good people get caught up in bad situations.

Rather than forment debate and resentment, here's an opportunity for Obama to unite, not divide.


Wanna guess which way he goes....


DEMOCRATS do not like scandals either. You could have a super majority of democrats--and they wouldn't nominate Susan Rice to be the next Secretary of State-simply-because they know she would get grilled over Bengazi under sworn testimony--for the required confirmation of her appointment.
 

Forum List

Back
Top