Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The court's action leaves a lower court ruling in place, finding that the photographer violated a state anti-discrimination law.
Though the photographer, Elaine Huguenin of Albuquerque, refused to photograph the ceremony on religious grounds, her appeal was based on a claim that her right of free expression as a creative artist allowed her to reject a client if the assignment would compel her to express an idea she opposes.
SCOTUS are cowards!
Just in:
Supreme Court Staying Out of Photographer's Same-Sex Client Case - NBC News
The court's action leaves a lower court ruling in place, finding that the photographer violated a state anti-discrimination law.
Though the photographer, Elaine Huguenin of Albuquerque, refused to photograph the ceremony on religious grounds, her appeal was based on a claim that her right of free expression as a creative artist allowed her to reject a client if the assignment would compel her to express an idea she opposes.
They have spoken. By not taking the case.
Their decline speaks volumes.Just in:
Supreme Court Staying Out of Photographer's Same-Sex Client Case - NBC News
The court's action leaves a lower court ruling in place, finding that the photographer violated a state anti-discrimination law.
Though the photographer, Elaine Huguenin of Albuquerque, refused to photograph the ceremony on religious grounds, her appeal was based on a claim that her right of free expression as a creative artist allowed her to reject a client if the assignment would compel her to express an idea she opposes.
They have spoken. By not taking the case.
They may have denied it due to technical reasons, not due to the content of the lawsuit.
they have not spoken on the merits of the case, because they did not take the case.
I expect your support of forcing black photographers to work at a KKK wedding as well.
True. The bigots are free to still be bigots, they just have to be more creative with how they discriminate.The lower court decision in the photography case was a very good decision and contained the blueprint for future photographers to act within their beliefs.
Their decline speaks volumes.Just in:
Supreme Court Staying Out of Photographer's Same-Sex Client Case - NBC News
They have spoken. By not taking the case.
They may have denied it due to technical reasons, not due to the content of the lawsuit.
they have not spoken on the merits of the case, because they did not take the case.
I expect your support of forcing black photographers to work at a KKK wedding as well.
As to the KKK, if you'd read the actual NM Supreme Court decision (which you surely didn't) -- they actually addressed exactly that point.
Bone up on it, whydoncha?
With hopes, someone will change your diaper soon.Their decline speaks volumes.They may have denied it due to technical reasons, not due to the content of the lawsuit.
they have not spoken on the merits of the case, because they did not take the case.
I expect your support of forcing black photographers to work at a KKK wedding as well.
As to the KKK, if you'd read the actual NM Supreme Court decision (which you surely didn't) -- they actually addressed exactly that point.
Bone up on it, whydoncha?
I've read it and their justification of their view is just as flimsy as the whole decision.
You and the gutless assholes who hold your position just want to force people to hold to YOUR moral and political beliefs, and are too cowardly to force the people to do it, you use government's gun to do it.
You are fascists, pure and simple, and need to be exposed as such.
SCOTUS are cowards!
But that young Republican said he was winning?
Roe is still law, but slowly we are turning that around....but as with your lack of debating skill, after 20-30 years, things will change, except your debating skill!
With hopes, someone will change your diaper soon.Their decline speaks volumes.
As to the KKK, if you'd read the actual NM Supreme Court decision (which you surely didn't) -- they actually addressed exactly that point.
Bone up on it, whydoncha?
I've read it and their justification of their view is just as flimsy as the whole decision.
You and the gutless assholes who hold your position just want to force people to hold to YOUR moral and political beliefs, and are too cowardly to force the people to do it, you use government's gun to do it.
You are fascists, pure and simple, and need to be exposed as such.
But that young Republican said he was winning?
Roe is still law, but slowly we are turning that around....but as with your lack of debating skill, after 20-30 years, things will change, except your debating skill!
Okay child
...weaker than usual, does your 5th grade have off from school today, or you cutting classes again?
Their decline speaks volumes.They may have denied it due to technical reasons, not due to the content of the lawsuit.
they have not spoken on the merits of the case, because they did not take the case.
I expect your support of forcing black photographers to work at a KKK wedding as well.
As to the KKK, if you'd read the actual NM Supreme Court decision (which you surely didn't) -- they actually addressed exactly that point.
Bone up on it, whydoncha?
I've read it and their justification of their view is just as flimsy as the whole decision.
You and the gutless assholes who hold your position just want to force people to hold to YOUR moral and political beliefs, and are too cowardly to force the people to do it, you use government's gun to do it.
You are fascists, pure and simple, and need to be exposed as such.
Their decline speaks volumes.
As to the KKK, if you'd read the actual NM Supreme Court decision (which you surely didn't) -- they actually addressed exactly that point.
Bone up on it, whydoncha?
I've read it and their justification of their view is just as flimsy as the whole decision.
You and the gutless assholes who hold your position just want to force people to hold to YOUR moral and political beliefs, and are too cowardly to force the people to do it, you use government's gun to do it.
You are fascists, pure and simple, and need to be exposed as such.
Like abortion and gay marriage where the right uses government to make it illegal?
Pot meet kettle
I've read it and their justification of their view is just as flimsy as the whole decision.
You and the gutless assholes who hold your position just want to force people to hold to YOUR moral and political beliefs, and are too cowardly to force the people to do it, you use government's gun to do it.
You are fascists, pure and simple, and need to be exposed as such.
Like abortion and gay marriage where the right uses government to make it illegal?
Pot meet kettle
I've never voted to disallow abortion OR gay marriage. What I support is a State's right to make laws for both, as the US constitution is neutral on both topics.
I live in NY, where both will always be legal and protected. Who cares if Mississippi wants to ban both? Guess what here is a solution, if you don't like it MOVE OUT OF MISSISSIPPI.
Like abortion and gay marriage where the right uses government to make it illegal?
Pot meet kettle
I've never voted to disallow abortion OR gay marriage. What I support is a State's right to make laws for both, as the US constitution is neutral on both topics.
I live in NY, where both will always be legal and protected. Who cares if Mississippi wants to ban both? Guess what here is a solution, if you don't like it MOVE OUT OF MISSISSIPPI.
So you are the GOP party? Go figure
It's not too difficult to determine if a business is subject to Public Accommodation laws.SCOTT declined to take the case because the lower court decision did not need to be changed or clarified. Following this decision gay couples will have to prove that a service was advertised to the general public. Not that the service was merely available upon request or special arrangement.
Like abortion and gay marriage where the right uses government to make it illegal?
Pot meet kettle
I've never voted to disallow abortion OR gay marriage. What I support is a State's right to make laws for both, as the US constitution is neutral on both topics.
I live in NY, where both will always be legal and protected. Who cares if Mississippi wants to ban both? Guess what here is a solution, if you don't like it MOVE OUT OF MISSISSIPPI.
So you are the GOP party? Go figure
