Supreme Court denies appeal of regretful Islamic State bride

DigitalDrifter

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2013
47,563
25,892
2,605
Oregon
Good!!! :clap:


BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear the appeal of a woman who left home in Alabama to join the Islamic State terror group, but then decided she wanted to return to the United States.


1641961268794.png


 
How regretful can the thing be if it has not totally renounced the totalitarian ideology that seeks to destroy the west?

It is just practicing Taqiyya and nobody should listen to it.

The Supreme court did the right thing.
 

According to the article, it appears that the meat of the decision is a finding that even though she was born in the U.S., because her father was here as a diplomat, she is not actually entitled to citizenship in this country.

That aspect makes this whole issue more favorable to her than it otherwise would be. I she was a citizen of the United States, then her association with the terrorist gang would make her guilty of treason, for which, if she were to return to the U.S., she should face serious criminal charges, and a very long stay in prison, if not the death penalty.

As a non-citizen, she's just a foreigner who is known to have associated with known terrorists; and on that basis, not to be allowed into this country, and to be deported if she is caught herein.
 
The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over Islamic marriage laws. 5he sole authority is the Islamic Court.
 
According to the article, it appears that the meat of the decision is a finding that even though she was born in the U.S., because her father was here as a diplomat, she is not actually entitled to citizenship in this country.

That aspect makes this whole issue more favorable to her than it otherwise would be. I she was a citizen of the United States, then her association with the terrorist gang would make her guilty of treason, for which, if she were to return to the U.S., she should face serious criminal charges, and a very long stay in prison, if not the death penalty.

As a non-citizen, she's just a foreigner who is known to have associated with known terrorists; and on that basis, not to be allowed into this country, and to be deported if she is caught herein.

You really think this administration would prosecute her for anything if she was considered a Citizen and allowed to come back?
 
Whom else can we get to renounce their U.S. Citizenship?

This may be a great plan to save the union and we Texans can back off our TEXIT protocols.

:beer:

In this case, it's not a matter of renouncing her citizenship; but of a determination that she never had it to begin with.

If she had lived her life as if she was a loyal U.S. citizen, she would probably have been allowed to live out her whole life as such, enjoying all the rights and privileges of U.S. citizenship, and no one would ever have questioned it.

It was her association with foreign terrorists that caused the courts to look into the circumstances of her birth, and for it to come out that under those circumstances, she was never entitled to citizenship in the first place.

And as I said before, this determination is actually to her favor, as it means she is merely a foreigner with terrorist ties, and not a U.S. citizen who has committed treason for which she should potentially face the death penalty.
 
Actually the Court didn't deny the appeal, it decided not to hear the case and left it up to federal judges that might go either way.
 

Forum List

Back
Top