Nevadamedic
Senior Member
and what about you young lady care to provide a example of a non exisitent
un-googlable expert i have provided.......no i didint think so
You idiots need to realize that 9/11 wasn't anything close to an inside job.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and what about you young lady care to provide a example of a non exisitent
un-googlable expert i have provided.......no i didint think so
You idiots need to realize that 9/11 wasn't anything close to an inside job.
no but we do realise other than offering up some joKe like popular mechanics you have almost no information on the subject and without question are completely unfamiliar with the conclusions or lack there of reached by nist or the 911 commission
The 9/11 commission dos NOT support your claim that it was an inside job. Another perfect example of your claiming what is not true.
Nist doesn't claim it was an inside job either.
I never said they did .however the commission members did say the report amounted to a a cover -up and nist stated the official version of events has a extremely low-rate of probability and other scenarios must be looked at whats important is they no longer support the whitehouse version of events
He likes parsing together bits of information and coming up with the most nefarious conclusion, doesn't he?
The thing he is right about, though, is that a better investigation and more transparency would go a long way to silencing the conspiracy folk.
I doubt it. Since they have already decided who did it, no amount of evidence tainted by the Government will ever convince them.
If that's the case, then heck with 'em, but I still think it behooves government to be as transparent as possible. I also think but for the looniest, there are answers that would be acceptable.... having clarity and ascertaining clear timelines would be a good start, as would addressing some of the questions that have arisen.
translation: no eots i can not provide a example. i am just pulling statements out of my ass as usual in a flailing attempt to distract from the fact i cant back my statement
I wouldn't say it's FAKE, but our government pretty much DID create it.
ME: Disagree, radical islam was created by islam after mohammed died
Zbigniew Brzezinski and the CIA were instrumental in helping to arm, train, and fund Bin Laden and the Mujahadeen in the late '70's to fight against the Soviets invading Afghanistan. This led to the creation of what we know as "Al Qaeda", which means "the base" or more specifically, "the database".
ME: yes we sped up radical islam war against us, the u.s. but they have been fighting the rest of the world since mohammed died, and they would have come for us eventually anyway. Do i know if what we did in afghanistan was a good idea, i dont know, we left too soon.
The "database" was simply the CIA's kept records of this group of fighters.
They introduced them to the idea of radical Islam.
We made Bin Laden into what he ended up ultimately being. He was thankful as far as us helping his cause, but afterwards he wanted us out of that land, specifically Saudia Arabia.
ME: we did prop him up, and he came after us. but eventually, after they conquered europe, they would have come for us, doesnt excuse anything.. just pointing it out
When we didn't oblige, he grew more and more hateful of the US. This is why it's a complete mystery to me that people argue the idea of "blowback". Everyday that goes by that we intrude upon their "holy land", more people grow hateful.
ME: they have been persecuting jews, and christians and non muslims for
There's no fundamental reason for us to be in the middle east, except to maintain ourselves as a player in the oil market, and maintain the US Dollar's hegemony. The peaceful muslims know it, the terrorists know it, and each day, more and more Americans are waking up to that fact. If another country was establishing itself in our homeland, and strong-arming our citizens, we'd be plotting and planning payback attacks, too, and you know it. I know that YOU know it, because of how pissed off you seem to be about Mexican illegals.
ME: we are the middle east because the saudi's asked us too. and the muslim world, doesnt need the u.s. or israel to hate them. they have no tolerance for non muslims, and treat their women like shit
I'm not certain what exactly happened on 9/11, but anyone with even a fraction of intelligence should be able to realize that the official story has some pretty big holes in it. Not that many of the conspiracy theories DON'T, but what actually MATTERS is that the government's version insults even MILD intelligence in many ways.
He likes parsing together bits of information and coming up with the most nefarious conclusion, doesn't he?
The thing he is right about, though, is that a better investigation and more transparency would go a long way to silencing the conspiracy folk.
I just read the OP. A burning sugar silo is proof? This is exhibit A---what happens when you get biased sources off the internet. I hope you don't use these sources on a college paper, cause they won't count. And if they do, your professor's biased also. Anyone can google "9-11 Conspiracy" and get thousands of (non-legit) websites that all have "proof" that it was an inside job.
And whoever claimed that the videos aren't real, is correct--cause it's a video depiction of something that was real. But try asking somone who was there, when the planes hit...ask them if that was hollywood or the government that decieved their eyes. Maybe they had the sky green-screened at the time.
I'll say again, a burning sugar silo, in no way, proves that 9-11 was an inside job. Until you provide evidence that is "exact" evidence, like: finding document that says, "The Government Did It." Then you don't have a valid argument. Biased media/people/websites are not supporting evidence or credible.
your argument is ridicoulus it is a criminal case that has not been properly
investigated ,the 911 commision and nist have both been non-conclusve andthose involved in the investigation stateing very clearly that witheld evidence and ommited testimony amounts to a cover up..the controled media is the issue..not websites or independent film ..the statements
of the patriots question 911 site are men of vast experience and expertise directly relating to the the eventf 911 are you trying to imply the statements are falsely made in ther name ? or there credintals and service are false ? the independent films they apear in veiwed by milions is the work of phtoshop and blue screens ? wow that conspiracy would be would be the news story wouldnt it ?...look at the site ..veiw the videos and think about it
logicaly...houston I think we have a problum
I'll admit that I don't have evidence to prove that it wasn't an inside job, however, this wasn't my thread, and you have to prove that it was an inside job.
So let's get this straight, Osama claimed responsibility even though it wasn't him? That is on tape!.
THE TAPE IS FAKE OF OSAMA
And you didn't comment on the video footage of the planes being fake.
THE PLANES ARE VERY REAL
Last I checked, a multi-ton 737/757 flying well over 500 miles per hour and full of highly flamable jet-fuel, crashing into a concrete, steel, and glass structure, creates an explosion. You're right, explosions did bring down Tower 1 and Tower 2.
Also, for those who claim there was exlosions afterward. Sure, I'll agree with that. The towers were burning. You ever watched a house burn, losts of explosions.
Have you ever watched a tree fall? When it splits at the base, the enormous amount of pressure (from weight of the tree) sends wood splintering into oblivion. It has explosive force.
It's the same concept here. WHen hit by the planes, the entire infrastructure was damaged. The towers were wobbling back and forth like grass in the wind (weakening even more of it's infrastructure). When the pressure was too great (from the wait of a 100 stories) and an airplane, the bottom snapped. You add electricity, fire and pressure together, and you can easily get explosions.
Also, if you watch the video, one of the towers is falling apart from the top to the bottom, like a stack of cards.
If you can fit a list of doubint government officials on one page, that's not nearly enough to suggest it was an inside job. I see alot of assumptions, and nothing proved.
Over 280 architects and engineers? Wow, that's really the majority of architects and engineers in the country. 900 people drank poison coolaid because of a similar belief, does that mean their right? no.
You still havn't PROVEN that it's an inside job. Just because a small minority of individuals believes that it was, doesn't make it proof.
Until you can give actual evidence...you have no case. Because all you have is suspicion based on other suspicions.
I like the "TAPE OF OSAMA IS FAKE" --where's you're proof? And don't give me another suspicion bit.
You have no evidence to back it up. Unless you can find the guy that pushed the button to blow up building 7, then you have a case.