Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Toro, Feb 9, 2008.
DEBUNKING JACKSHIT...NICE TRY
911 Molten Metal - Who is lying? FDNY eyewitnesses or NIST?
Aug. 21, 2007 - Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation featured the statement of James Quintiere, Ph.D., one of the world's leading fire science researchers.
Eots is this one of your Col's?....
Just curious since you have made a history here of claiming that the mere presence of rank equates to something other than what it means.
Do you actually think you're dealing with someone who wants to know the truth?
what a moron.. the experience service and expertise of the "patriots question" is top level with a lifetime of service and there are a 100 of them not one. it is you and your buddy's response that seeks to avoid the truth ..so in rgs world top level NASA scientist ,aircraft crash investigators ,heads of the uranium enrichment programs etc etc are all deluded soldiers and the eyewitness NYFD also deluded
Simple question for the conspiracy theorists: Is there any condition under which you would accept that the events that transpired is pretty much what has been widely reported (3 planes crashed into buildings, hijacked by muslims, WTC collapsiing due to damage from planes, etc.)? This requires a soul searching honest answer. Only you know if your answer is honest or not.
The thing with conspiraccy theorists is the answer to that question is either yes, in which case their lieing to themselves and not the objective people they claim to be or the answer is no (that would be the being honest part) in which case there is no point in debateing with someone whos belief isn't based in reason.
I think you got mixed up. Yes would be right answer here, there IS conditions under which I could accept events transpired as reported. These conditions would include a professional unbiased investigation, declassification of the Pentagon tapes and official responses to the issues that have been brought up about the "official theory."
its the other way around the conclusion that the official story is not true based on evidence and expert analyses . believing the white house story is based on faith and emotion.. its like we are asking to look at the fact you mother who raised you and loved you is the one burying murder victims in the basement and you will go to great lengths of denial to not even consider it...the nist dosent even beilive the white house story !
It is the quote 'white house story' I believe. It's scientists who have studied the evidence.
Separate names with a comma.