Helios
Member
- Jan 27, 2008
- 334
- 21
- 16
Taking ignorance one step beyond.
The video has long been classified as "fake" evidence. Try to keep up.
Umm... who is denying that 9/11 happened? People are merely denying HOW it was EXPLAINED.
Hmm... I'll have to go with "not."
For "reasons we entered the Iraq War" >
http://usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=52323
I have to admit Bush would lose against a box of rocks, but maybe he could take on one or two of them.
Done. What next?
Brilliant finish! Umm although no one is debating planes hitting buildings, most people are just concerned with how the investigation was handled. I mean there are some things that just didn't match up. The building falls completely symmetrically and evenly down. That's not how it's supposed to look... except in controlled demolitions.
All I'm asking for is actual evidence 'you stupid fucker'. You didn't answer a single quesiton instead choosing to go on your "you're brainwashed".
Why is it so hard to believe that a bunch of islamists hijacked the plane considering they hate us, and bin laden claimed responsibility?
The video has long been classified as "fake" evidence. Try to keep up.
Why is so hard to beleive when there is video evidence everywhere and eyewitnesses that saw the planes hit those buildings?
Umm... who is denying that 9/11 happened? People are merely denying HOW it was EXPLAINED.
You keep telling everyone to be objective. Maybe it's time you do the same. Start thinking about how well this woudl have had to have been planned to accomplish this goal. Start thinking whether or not your dislike for Bush and his administration has anything to do with your opinion.
Hmm... I'll have to go with "not."
Start thinking about the leap that a Presdient decided he had to murder 3000 people to accomplish what, exactley?
For "reasons we entered the Iraq War" >
http://usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=52323
Start thinking about you are blaming this on an administratio n that in every other facet you claim is dumber than a box of rocks.
I have to admit Bush would lose against a box of rocks, but maybe he could take on one or two of them.
Start thinking about how well this would have had to be orchestrated for this to be an inside job.
Done. What next?
Again you tell us to think objectively. Time for you quacks to start to walking the walk. Perhaps a long one off a short pier.
Brilliant finish! Umm although no one is debating planes hitting buildings, most people are just concerned with how the investigation was handled. I mean there are some things that just didn't match up. The building falls completely symmetrically and evenly down. That's not how it's supposed to look... except in controlled demolitions.