Stone Jury Bias...Trump Should Pardon

Foreman of jury was a racist and rabid anti-Trump fanatic. Another jurors husband worked at same division of DOJ doing the prosecution...and liberal judge wouldn't remove them upon request. total bullshit, totally politicized. Like a Stalinist show trial.
Roger Stone jury foreperson's anti-Trump social media posts surface after she defends DOJ prosecutors


Kurt Schlichter, as usual, has a great take on this ......

Trump Charges the Liberal Hacks’ Latest Ambush

Okay, the sentencing memo gives the government’s perspective on the appropriate sentence based on such factors as the sentencing guidelines, the effect of the crime, the prior crimes of the convict, and other factors like age. For these non-violent offenses by a first-time offender of age 67, which caused zero harm, and were related to the “collusion” that even Mueller’s pack of scummy Democrats were forced to admit was a lie, you would expect somewhere from a few months to a couple of years in Club Fed. And apparently that’s what the persecutors briefed to their bosses, because in a high-vis case like this, flunky attorneys brief their bosses at the DOJ.

These hacks instead asked for 7 to 9 years.

Literally no one on earth could say in good faith that was remotely appropriate for this case. None, at least not without lying. It’s equal to a death sentence, but then it’s a Trump associate so there are apparently special rules. And you’ll notice few of the Dems whining about this say this is an appropriate sentence – at least not with a straight face.

They did it to make Trump react. They knew the establishment and its submissive media would freak out. They thought they could derail his most epic run ever.

------
Well, Trump reacted. He tweeted the manifest and undeniable truth – that the liberal persecutors were treating Lady Justice like Harvey Weinstein treated eager starlets, except without the sop of a minor supporting role in a Gwyneth Paltrow flick.

Trump charged right into the ambush.

The reaction was predictable, especially after the DOJ brass realized these punks had bait and switched their sentencing recommendation. The DOJ promised to revise the recommendation and the media and liberal pols went nuts. This is the same media and the same liberal pols who want actual criminals to go free, who think arresting illegal alien thugs is a crime against humanity, and who want to close our prisons and turn them into Billy Jack-esque Rainbow Schools to teach hugging and climate paranoia to children.

Then he questioned the judge’s impartiality, which you are not allowed to do because of reasons unless its Gorsuch or Kavanaugh. Then it’s totally principled, the principle being “the elite gets its way.”
------

Except Trump does not play that loser’s game. They still think that Trump can somehow be shamed into obedience to the elite by castigating him for violating its arbitrary and unequally enforced unwritten rules.

He can’t.

We hired Trump to break the establishment paradigm that pretends our so-called betters are about the rule of law when they really just use the law to rule. If there is a “norm” or “rule” that requires us to look away and ignore when liberals twist and pervert the power of their positions to pursue politically motivated vendettas, then such “norms” and “rules” should not just be broken.


They should be shattered.

Enter The Donald.

They thought they were cunning. They thought they were smart. They set up an ambush thinking, yet again, that This Time We Will Get Trump™.

Trump charged.

Here’s how this ends.

It ends with Roger Stone (and LTG Mike Flynn) pardoned, and the libs crying.

 
Enter The Donald.
serling-on-trump-meme.jpg

~S~
 
Each side in a criminal trial gets a number of "preemptive strikes" of potential jurors without needing to show cause, and then may request a strike "for cause," i.e. obvious bias or connections with the defendant. This person was not stricken, and sat through the presentation of the evidence so she may have very good reason to support the prosecutors, unlike the senators who made up their minds to acquit trump before the trial, some announcing to the press in advance, and voting to acquit him after refusing even to review all the evidence and witnesses, in violation of the oath that they took to sit as impartial jurors.

Stone was convicted of witness tampering and making false statements to the House Intelligence Committee, crimes that involve only his own personal conduct. Hart obviously concluded that he was guilty. If the judge's charge to the jury accurately stated the governing law, she and every other juror were free to decide for themselves.

Moreover, in the real world, I would doubt that an entire jury could be impaneled that, to a person, did not have an opinion of trump.
 
Trump pardons war criminals, So why wouldn’t he pardon those that threaten witnesses with violence or pardon a lying Russian lackey?
 
Foreman of jury was a racist and rabid anti-Trump fanatic. Another jurors husband worked at same division of DOJ doing the prosecution...and liberal judge wouldn't remove them upon request. total bullshit, totally politicized. Like a Stalinist show trial.
Roger Stone jury foreperson's anti-Trump social media posts surface after she defends DOJ prosecutors
Absolute miscarriage of justice here.

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
Really? Because you think that the evidence didn’t show Roger Stone is innocent or because you’re just repeating what Trump says?
 
Tomeka is a hate filled TDS afflicted piece of shit, not to mention she is a dumbass Negro.
 
Foreman of jury was a racist and rabid anti-Trump fanatic. Another jurors husband worked at same division of DOJ doing the prosecution...and liberal judge wouldn't remove them upon request. total bullshit, totally politicized. Like a Stalinist show trial.
Roger Stone jury foreperson's anti-Trump social media posts surface after she defends DOJ prosecutors
Did you guys find out if any of the jurors were Mexican?
:lol:
Or Trump supporters? It only takes 1 juror voting not guilty, to be a mistrial, All 12 to convict.
 
Foreman of jury was a racist and rabid anti-Trump fanatic. Another jurors husband worked at same division of DOJ doing the prosecution...and liberal judge wouldn't remove them upon request. total bullshit, totally politicized. Like a Stalinist show trial.
Roger Stone jury foreperson's anti-Trump social media posts surface after she defends DOJ prosecutors
Did you guys find out if any of the jurors were Mexican?
:lol:
Or Trump supporters? It only takes 1 juror voting not guilty, to be a mistrial, All 12 to convict.
Don’t confuse Trumpers with facts it will only give them brain aneurisms.
 
This president perp walks an honest, purple heart recipient for pure showmanship, from the Whitehouse, then orders his Roy Cohn, AG Barr to go easy on his dirty, scummy beyond scuzzy, felon friend, Roger Stone....

What is wrong is now right
What is up is now down...
What was criminal is now lawful
What is lawless is now cheered.....

You can't make this crap up....

This president is the most corrupt president and admin in our history, and YOU enable him..... Why?
 
Are we claiming Stone should have only had Republicans as jurors?
 

Forum List

Back
Top