- Feb 22, 2017
- 113,837
- 40,401
- 2,290
I saw it firsthand. I do this for a living.My point was that by 2015 Obama’s presidency was done. I can explain it to you this way since you have zero business acumen. Let’s say you’re overweight. The first 20 pds comes off easily but the next 20 takes real work. Unemployment was so artificially high that by natural progression and by pumping $10trn into the economy and reducing rates to the lowest levels possible, unemployment declined. But wages were stagnant. Trump was seen as a business friendly candidate and many businesses began to hire in case he won because they knew that the qualified pool of employees would dwindle quickly and they would have to pay more for them. It was a gamble. But it paid off for those who were proactive. Faun has zero business acumen, like you. So he doesn’t comprehend that nor did he know what QE was. Do you really believe they I dont know when elections are? Be sensible.You took it out of context. I said ran and basically won as he was the front runner and BHO was a lame duck. Obviously I know elections take place every four years. But thanks for being a research monkey.Liar. You said he "won" the election while the black unemployment rate was 9.4%...
... and that was in 2015.
Are you trying to imply that just him being the "front runner" of the GOP primary was enough to affect black unemployment? Really?
How do you then explain the 7.3 percentage points it had dropped in the previous few years before Trump choose to become a Repub again?
That is a very nice story, too bad the data does not support it. There was no surge in hiring after the Trump announcement. In fact job creation for 2015 was slower after he took over “front runner” status and that continued in 2016, which was 18% slower than 2015...which was 10% slower than 2014.
You make up these things to justify your worship of the man...but they have no basis in reality.
Another moron that thinks their made up stories trump actual data.
So tell me, at work do you tell your clients to ignore the data and just take your word for it?