Actually, it's frpm the exact same chapter that you posted earlier, demonstrating you have no clue if what you're talking about.That is not the same chapter I quoted in the post I made earlier in this thread. But glad to see you have posted it where you can see that it says "lay with".Your denial runs deep. The Book of Jasher describes exactly what I said...The Book of Jasher does not describe the same as what you are describing with your own words. The Book of Jasher describes the evil Sodomites and the Gomorrahites and that section describes how they kill Lot's daughter Paltith for giving bread and water to the traveling stranger that the Sodomites and Gomrrahites were trying to starve to death.Your posting does put your twisted mannerism on whatever to your likening. But this is your way so it shows what you are all about.So? I am not the one who brought up the Book of Jasher. I am pointing out to the person who did that the Book of Jasher describes the same event as the Bible where two of Lot's daughters got him drunk so that they could incestuously rape him.
In today's day and age, they would have gone to prison for such an act. But the Lord seemed to have rewarded their actions by making their sons patriarchs of their respective tribes.
57 And Lot and his two daughters remained in the cave, and they made their father drink wine, and they lay with him, for they said there was no man upon earth that could raise up seed from them, for they thought that the whole earth was destroyed.
58 And they both lay with their father, and they conceived and bare sons, and the first born called the name of her son Moab, saying, From my father did I conceive him; he is the father of the Moabites unto this day.
Now then, you claim those weren't Lot's daughters -- whose daughters were they if not Lot's?
The Bible doesn't help your delusions. Neither does the Book of Jasher.
Seems you need yet another source.
As far as it saying they "lay" with him, that means they had sex with him. You may not understand that since you're in such deep denial, but that's what it means.