Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The fallacy is that not all outcome of any given system will be Bad or Good; but dependent upon the management of the system.Different rules, systems, and outcomes are irrelevant to the extent management is Good and not Bad.All governments govern. Rules for governing are usually agreed to by the People.
Different rules, different systems, different outcomes.
What is so attractive about Communism to you?
you are confused due to your having nothing but fallacy at your disposal.
It is about Order versus Chaos.
We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Believing that different systems have differences that cause different outcomes is hardly a fallacy.
It is dishonest of you to pretend otherwise.
Order vs Chaos?
The Founding Fathers were not using that meaning of the word "order" in that sentence.
What is so attractive about Communism to you?
You are confusing communism with socialism.
Our Founding Fathers already Told us how much socialism we need; merely enough to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States.
dude, the religious prove it every day; a Commune of Heaven on Earth merely requires Good social morals for free and not Bad social morals for free.
Hey, Special Ed, I have question for you.
Why are you such an asshole?
it is about social morals for free versus capital morals for a price, dear.dude, the religious prove it every day; a Commune of Heaven on Earth merely requires Good social morals for free and not Bad social morals for free.
anybody know what the illiterate liberal is trying to say??
dude, the religious prove it every day; a Commune of Heaven on Earth merely requires Good social morals for free and not Bad social morals for free.
dude, the religious prove it every day; a Commune of Heaven on Earth merely requires Good social morals for free and not Bad social morals for free.
I have repeatedly explained that I do not have a clue what you mean by this.
"The Religious"? WTF, does that mean? There is no group of Religous that operates as a group. That is a meaningless phrase.
"prove it"? Prove what? Do they really prove it? I doubt it. YOu certainly do nothing to support your claim.
"A commune of heaven on Earth"? WTF does that mean?
"Good social morals" for free"? WTF does that mean? YOu have never given a single clue, other than maybe communism.
"Not bad social morals for free"? WTF does that mean?
I think that you know you cannot defend your position and you are purposely spewing nonsense.
dude, the religious prove it every day; a Commune of Heaven on Earth merely requires Good social morals for free and not Bad social morals for free.
I have repeatedly explained that I do not have a clue what you mean by this.
"The Religious"? WTF, does that mean? There is no group of Religous that operates as a group. That is a meaningless phrase.
"prove it"? Prove what? Do they really prove it? I doubt it. YOu certainly do nothing to support your claim.
"A commune of heaven on Earth"? WTF does that mean?
"Good social morals" for free"? WTF does that mean? YOu have never given a single clue, other than maybe communism.
"Not bad social morals for free"? WTF does that mean?
I think that you know you cannot defend your position and you are purposely spewing nonsense.
you must accept that he's some version of liberal insane and illiterate.
Why not solve for capitalism's laziness regarding full employment by using socialism to bailout capitalism, like usual.
Why not solve for capitalism's laziness regarding full employment by using socialism to bailout capitalism, like usual.
i am referring to the laws of the demand and supply and solving for capitalism's laziness regarding full employment by using socialism to bailout capitalism, like usual, dear.Why not solve for capitalism's laziness regarding full employment by using socialism to bailout capitalism, like usual.
100% stupid since capitalism just bailed out Socialism in China eliminating 40% of the entire worlds poverty.
Daniel is an illiterate who loves to look stupid.
it is about solving for simple poverty by solving for a natural rate unemployment at the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage that clears our poverty guidelines; on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.Why not solve for capitalism's laziness regarding full employment by using socialism to bailout capitalism, like usual.
There exists a cliche of the brilliant man, who is so brilliant, that the Common Man cannot understand him.
That he speaks and thinks on a Plane well beyond the reach of all but few other brilliant men, if any.
That is the cliche you are trying to emulate.
But it is a Myth.
The really brilliant people understand complex ideas enough to explain them in detail to the Common Man.
You cannot expand the minds of other people with obtuse metaphors and poetic jargon.
I have worked though out my life to improve my ability to communicate my ideas to people despite various Barriers to Communication.
Your little game on being purposefully obtuse, is not making you look Brilliant.
I don't know if it has every worked for you, but it is not working now, and frankly it is very disingenuous and rude.
it is about solving for simple poverty by solving for a natural rate unemployment at the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage that clears our poverty guidelines; on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.Why not solve for capitalism's laziness regarding full employment by using socialism to bailout capitalism, like usual.
There exists a cliche of the brilliant man, who is so brilliant, that the Common Man cannot understand him.
That he speaks and thinks on a Plane well beyond the reach of all but few other brilliant men, if any.
That is the cliche you are trying to emulate.
But it is a Myth.
The really brilliant people understand complex ideas enough to explain them in detail to the Common Man.
You cannot expand the minds of other people with obtuse metaphors and poetic jargon.
I have worked though out my life to improve my ability to communicate my ideas to people despite various Barriers to Communication.
Your little game on being purposefully obtuse, is not making you look Brilliant.
I don't know if it has every worked for you, but it is not working now, and frankly it is very disingenuous and rude.
Yes, it is; simply Because I just said so.it is about solving for simple poverty by solving for a natural rate unemployment at the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage that clears our poverty guidelines; on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.Why not solve for capitalism's laziness regarding full employment by using socialism to bailout capitalism, like usual.
There exists a cliche of the brilliant man, who is so brilliant, that the Common Man cannot understand him.
That he speaks and thinks on a Plane well beyond the reach of all but few other brilliant men, if any.
That is the cliche you are trying to emulate.
But it is a Myth.
The really brilliant people understand complex ideas enough to explain them in detail to the Common Man.
You cannot expand the minds of other people with obtuse metaphors and poetic jargon.
I have worked though out my life to improve my ability to communicate my ideas to people despite various Barriers to Communication.
Your little game on being purposefully obtuse, is not making you look Brilliant.
I don't know if it has every worked for you, but it is not working now, and frankly it is very disingenuous and rude.
NO, it's not.
And why are you talking like that?
Why are you making me work just to SOMETIMES get a clue as to what you are saying?
If this is really the way your ideas come out of your head, you AT LEAST need to work very hard on improving your communication skills.
Medical intervention should not be ruled out, either.
You remind me of people who were over medicated.
he's liberal, illiterate, ego maniacal, and English is not his first language. He's a waste but a typical liberal in many ways too.Why are you making me work just to SOMETIMES get a clue as to what you are saying?
.
