So When Do the Statues Come Down and Renaming Begin?

Well, we have seen how little evidence or truth is needed for the mob to convict Brett Kavanaugh of rape. So accusing someone of rape carries almost no weight, compared to even two years ago.
True. The rape boundary was crossed when Bill Clinton was in office. Once you've defended your guy against legitimate charges of rape it's not possible to then go after another president for allegations of the same.
The left already played the get out of jail free card.
Bill Clinton had one woman make any claim of rape & she had previously sworn under oath that it never happened.

I never voted for Bill Clinton. The worst of the accusations against Clinton came out after the election. You knew Trump was a POS & you voted for him anyhow.
Lol
Clueless Dave, You’re most definitely a Clinton fan boy so shut the fuck up
 
So, to you,having affairs etc is the same as enslaving, torturing, lynching people.

How many affairs has Trump had & you sassfuckls love him. Is there a number that you find acceptable 5, 10, 20?
Who has a statue that tortured and lynched people?
Statures of those that supported & fought so they could enslaven, torture & lynch black people. They fought for the "Southern Mentality" of treating black people as lesser people & sat idly by as they were lynched.
If you have to move the goal post in a debate, you lost the debate. Nice try, retard. :laugh:

Why the fuck were the statues being rreoved???? Because the fought to continue slavery.

You are dumber than shit

Those statues/monuments were moved because they had been put there, usually on public property and always in high-visibility spots by the UDC as propaganda transmitters to propagate the whole "Lost Cause" revisionist history bullshit, and municipalities on whose property it had been so placed said GTFO. We've been over and over this.

That's why I asked the OP at the beginning of this thread how the same can possibly apply to MLK back in post 13. He ran away from that query, because he's an idiot.
Everything named and any statue of MLK is repulsive if this is true. Don't make excuses. Most white Christians do not for their own fallible fools. The Catholic Church has taken a beating for what their priests have done. MLK was supposed to be a man of God above everything else. You have agendas for every thing possible. Those civil war statues are the same as the way MLK treated or approved of others violating women. This is what i going to take over as you say will happen. And there will be no rules then.
 
Who has a statue that tortured and lynched people?
Statures of those that supported & fought so they could enslaven, torture & lynch black people. They fought for the "Southern Mentality" of treating black people as lesser people & sat idly by as they were lynched.
If you have to move the goal post in a debate, you lost the debate. Nice try, retard. :laugh:

Why the fuck were the statues being rreoved???? Because the fought to continue slavery.

You are dumber than shit

Those statues/monuments were moved because they had been put there, usually on public property and always in high-visibility spots by the UDC as propaganda transmitters to propagate the whole "Lost Cause" revisionist history bullshit, and municipalities on whose property it had been so placed said GTFO. We've been over and over this.

That's why I asked the OP at the beginning of this thread how the same can possibly apply to MLK back in post 13. He ran away from that query, because he's an idiot.
Everything named and any statue of MLK is repulsive if this is true. Don't make excuses. Most white Christians do not for their own fallible fools. The Catholic Church has taken a beating for what their priests have done. MLK was supposed to be a man of God above everything else. You have agendas for every thing possible. Those civil war statues are the same as the way MLK treated or approved of others violating women. This is what i going to take over as you say will happen. And there will be no rules then.

Does anyone on earth, including you, ever proofread these incoherent word salads you post here?

This thread's got nothing to do with "God" or "Christians" or "Catholics". You're drunk.
 
Statures of those that supported & fought so they could enslaven, torture & lynch black people. They fought for the "Southern Mentality" of treating black people as lesser people & sat idly by as they were lynched.
If you have to move the goal post in a debate, you lost the debate. Nice try, retard. :laugh:

Why the fuck were the statues being rreoved???? Because the fought to continue slavery.

You are dumber than shit

Those statues/monuments were moved because they had been put there, usually on public property and always in high-visibility spots by the UDC as propaganda transmitters to propagate the whole "Lost Cause" revisionist history bullshit, and municipalities on whose property it had been so placed said GTFO. We've been over and over this.

That's why I asked the OP at the beginning of this thread how the same can possibly apply to MLK back in post 13. He ran away from that query, because he's an idiot.
Everything named and any statue of MLK is repulsive if this is true. Don't make excuses. Most white Christians do not for their own fallible fools. The Catholic Church has taken a beating for what their priests have done. MLK was supposed to be a man of God above everything else. You have agendas for every thing possible. Those civil war statues are the same as the way MLK treated or approved of others violating women. This is what i going to take over as you say will happen. And there will be no rules then.

Does anyone on earth, including you, ever proofread these incoherent word salads you post here?

This thread's got nothing to do with "God" or "Christians" or "Catholics". You're drunk.
You are deflecting again.
 
If you have to move the goal post in a debate, you lost the debate. Nice try, retard. :laugh:

Why the fuck were the statues being rreoved???? Because the fought to continue slavery.

You are dumber than shit

Those statues/monuments were moved because they had been put there, usually on public property and always in high-visibility spots by the UDC as propaganda transmitters to propagate the whole "Lost Cause" revisionist history bullshit, and municipalities on whose property it had been so placed said GTFO. We've been over and over this.

That's why I asked the OP at the beginning of this thread how the same can possibly apply to MLK back in post 13. He ran away from that query, because he's an idiot.
Everything named and any statue of MLK is repulsive if this is true. Don't make excuses. Most white Christians do not for their own fallible fools. The Catholic Church has taken a beating for what their priests have done. MLK was supposed to be a man of God above everything else. You have agendas for every thing possible. Those civil war statues are the same as the way MLK treated or approved of others violating women. This is what i going to take over as you say will happen. And there will be no rules then.

Does anyone on earth, including you, ever proofread these incoherent word salads you post here?

This thread's got nothing to do with "God" or "Christians" or "Catholics". You're drunk.
You are deflecting again.

Put your posts into actual English and address what the topic actually is, and we'll talk turkey.

As I said ----- this thread has zippo to do with "Catholics" or "God" or any of that shit, so you're the deflector here. Must be skeered of the topic.

Again --- if the OP could defend his dishonest double standard premise, he'd be here instead of having abandoned thread.
He gone.
 
Who has a statue that tortured and lynched people?
Statures of those that supported & fought so they could enslaven, torture & lynch black people. They fought for the "Southern Mentality" of treating black people as lesser people & sat idly by as they were lynched.
Name a statue of someone who violated the law.
I’ll name one.

MLK.

So, you think lynching was legal.

What law did MLK break? A law stating black people can not enter?
Which lyncher has a statue?
Lynching was often done without any concern from the States & the practice was defended by those who fought for the Confederacy.
Which lyncher has a statue?
 
So, to you,having affairs etc is the same as enslaving, torturing, lynching people.

How many affairs has Trump had & you sassfuckls love him. Is there a number that you find acceptable 5, 10, 20?
Who has a statue that tortured and lynched people?
Statures of those that supported & fought so they could enslaven, torture & lynch black people. They fought for the "Southern Mentality" of treating black people as lesser people & sat idly by as they were lynched.
If you have to move the goal post in a debate, you lost the debate. Nice try, retard. :laugh:

Why the fuck were the statues being rreoved???? Because the fought to continue slavery.

You are dumber than shit

Those statues/monuments were moved because they had been put there, usually on public property and always in high-visibility spots by the UDC as propaganda transmitters to propagate the whole "Lost Cause" revisionist history bullshit, and municipalities on whose property it had been so placed said GTFO. We've been over and over this.

That's why I asked the OP at the beginning of this thread how the same can possibly apply to MLK back in post 13. He ran away from that query, because he's an idiot.
Those removal rules would apply to MLK too though if it turns out this is true, right?
 
Well, we have seen how little evidence or truth is needed for the mob to convict Brett Kavanaugh of rape. So accusing someone of rape carries almost no weight, compared to even two years ago.
True. The rape boundary was crossed when Bill Clinton was in office. Once you've defended your guy against legitimate charges of rape it's not possible to then go after another president for allegations of the same.
The left already played the get out of jail free card.
Bill Clinton had one woman make any claim of rape & she had previously sworn under oath that it never happened.

I never voted for Bill Clinton. The worst of the accusations against Clinton came out after the election. You knew Trump was a POS & you voted for him anyhow.


The one that took a sitting president to a civil trial, that one?


Lol he had to pay Paula almost a million dollars.


.
 
Who has a statue that tortured and lynched people?
Statures of those that supported & fought so they could enslaven, torture & lynch black people. They fought for the "Southern Mentality" of treating black people as lesser people & sat idly by as they were lynched.
If you have to move the goal post in a debate, you lost the debate. Nice try, retard. :laugh:

Why the fuck were the statues being rreoved???? Because the fought to continue slavery.

You are dumber than shit

Those statues/monuments were moved because they had been put there, usually on public property and always in high-visibility spots by the UDC as propaganda transmitters to propagate the whole "Lost Cause" revisionist history bullshit, and municipalities on whose property it had been so placed said GTFO. We've been over and over this.

That's why I asked the OP at the beginning of this thread how the same can possibly apply to MLK back in post 13. He ran away from that query, because he's an idiot.
Those removal rules would apply to MLK too though if it turns out this is true, right?

We'll go straight back to the first thing I posted here ------

--------- when did the UDC.... or anybody..... put up MLK statues to propagate a false history and keep white people in their place?

See the call for "consistency" in the OP?
Well, I do too. Yet apparently the OP does not. And he's the one what wrote it.
 
Statures of those that supported & fought so they could enslaven, torture & lynch black people. They fought for the "Southern Mentality" of treating black people as lesser people & sat idly by as they were lynched.
If you have to move the goal post in a debate, you lost the debate. Nice try, retard. :laugh:

Why the fuck were the statues being rreoved???? Because the fought to continue slavery.

You are dumber than shit

Those statues/monuments were moved because they had been put there, usually on public property and always in high-visibility spots by the UDC as propaganda transmitters to propagate the whole "Lost Cause" revisionist history bullshit, and municipalities on whose property it had been so placed said GTFO. We've been over and over this.

That's why I asked the OP at the beginning of this thread how the same can possibly apply to MLK back in post 13. He ran away from that query, because he's an idiot.
Those removal rules would apply to MLK too though if it turns out this is true, right?

We'll go straight back to the first thing I posted here ------

--------- when did the UDC.... or anybody..... put up MLK statues to propagate a false history and keep white people in their place?

See the call for "consistency" in the OP?
Well, I do too. Yet apparently the OP does not. And he's the one what wrote it.
What false history are you referring to? It sounds like youre just trying to change the goal posts because you got trounced in a debate.
 
If you have to move the goal post in a debate, you lost the debate. Nice try, retard. :laugh:

Why the fuck were the statues being rreoved???? Because the fought to continue slavery.

You are dumber than shit

Those statues/monuments were moved because they had been put there, usually on public property and always in high-visibility spots by the UDC as propaganda transmitters to propagate the whole "Lost Cause" revisionist history bullshit, and municipalities on whose property it had been so placed said GTFO. We've been over and over this.

That's why I asked the OP at the beginning of this thread how the same can possibly apply to MLK back in post 13. He ran away from that query, because he's an idiot.
Those removal rules would apply to MLK too though if it turns out this is true, right?

We'll go straight back to the first thing I posted here ------

--------- when did the UDC.... or anybody..... put up MLK statues to propagate a false history and keep white people in their place?

See the call for "consistency" in the OP?
Well, I do too. Yet apparently the OP does not. And he's the one what wrote it.
What false history are you referring to? It sounds like youre just trying to change the goal posts because you got trounced in a debate.

Read much? Do I have to repeat-post everything because you couldn't be bothered to read it the first time??

160.
 
Well, we have seen how little evidence or truth is needed for the mob to convict Brett Kavanaugh of rape. So accusing someone of rape carries almost no weight, compared to even two years ago.
True. The rape boundary was crossed when Bill Clinton was in office. Once you've defended your guy against legitimate charges of rape it's not possible to then go after another president for allegations of the same.
The left already played the get out of jail free card.
Bill Clinton had one woman make any claim of rape & she had previously sworn under oath that it never happened.

I never voted for Bill Clinton. The worst of the accusations against Clinton came out after the election. You knew Trump was a POS & you voted for him anyhow.


The one that took a sitting president to a civil trial, that one?


Lol he had to pay Paula almost a million dollars.


.


Paula Jones accused Bill Clinton of sexual harassment.

He exposed himself & asked for sex. She said no. That is it.

NO RAPE you stupid shit. No accusation of rape.

Are you this stupid?



Ypu
 
Well, we have seen how little evidence or truth is needed for the mob to convict Brett Kavanaugh of rape. So accusing someone of rape carries almost no weight, compared to even two years ago.
True. The rape boundary was crossed when Bill Clinton was in office. Once you've defended your guy against legitimate charges of rape it's not possible to then go after another president for allegations of the same.
The left already played the get out of jail free card.
Bill Clinton had one woman make any claim of rape & she had previously sworn under oath that it never happened.

I never voted for Bill Clinton. The worst of the accusations against Clinton came out after the election. You knew Trump was a POS & you voted for him anyhow.
Lol
Clueless Dave, You’re most definitely a Clinton fan boy so shut the fuck up
Funny chit from a Trumpette
 
Actually, since people voted for Trump ignoring his amorality, that people should now trash MLK because of his affairs.
Total babble. If you had a point to make it cannot be
discovered because your communication skills are so absolutely dismal.

Somehow having affairs is eqivalent to supporting & fighting for slavery, racism, lynching and attaacking the United States.
And this makes even less sense. Sober up and try later when you can actually make a point.
Look I did not compare statues of Confederate Generals who lead forces against the United States of Americas to defend the Southern Way of Life that included slavery, torture and lynching.

How fucking stupid are you? They fought for the right to lynch black people without repercussion.

Is that clear enough?
 
Why the fuck were the statues being rreoved???? Because the fought to continue slavery.

You are dumber than shit

Those statues/monuments were moved because they had been put there, usually on public property and always in high-visibility spots by the UDC as propaganda transmitters to propagate the whole "Lost Cause" revisionist history bullshit, and municipalities on whose property it had been so placed said GTFO. We've been over and over this.

That's why I asked the OP at the beginning of this thread how the same can possibly apply to MLK back in post 13. He ran away from that query, because he's an idiot.
Those removal rules would apply to MLK too though if it turns out this is true, right?

We'll go straight back to the first thing I posted here ------

--------- when did the UDC.... or anybody..... put up MLK statues to propagate a false history and keep white people in their place?

See the call for "consistency" in the OP?
Well, I do too. Yet apparently the OP does not. And he's the one what wrote it.
What false history are you referring to? It sounds like youre just trying to change the goal posts because you got trounced in a debate.

Read much? Do I have to repeat-post everything because you couldn't be bothered to read it the first time??

160.
Nope, im directly responding to what you say in your posts, but you cant seem to come up with any kind of retort. Quit stalling and answer the question.
 
Well, we have seen how little evidence or truth is needed for the mob to convict Brett Kavanaugh of rape. So accusing someone of rape carries almost no weight, compared to even two years ago.
True. The rape boundary was crossed when Bill Clinton was in office. Once you've defended your guy against legitimate charges of rape it's not possible to then go after another president for allegations of the same.
The left already played the get out of jail free card.
Bill Clinton had one woman make any claim of rape & she had previously sworn under oath that it never happened.

I never voted for Bill Clinton. The worst of the accusations against Clinton came out after the election. You knew Trump was a POS & you voted for him anyhow.


The one that took a sitting president to a civil trial, that one?


Lol he had to pay Paula almost a million dollars.


.


Paula Jones accused Bill Clinton of sexual harassment.

He exposed himself & asked for sex. She said no. That is it.

NO RAPE you stupid shit. No accusation of rape.

Are you this stupid?



Ypu


Oh yeah I have to pay almost a million dollars every time a girl turns me down too
 
Actually, since people voted for Trump ignoring his amorality, that people should now trash MLK because of his affairs.
Total babble. If you had a point to make it cannot be
discovered because your communication skills are so absolutely dismal.

Somehow having affairs is eqivalent to supporting & fighting for slavery, racism, lynching and attaacking the United States.
And this makes even less sense. Sober up and try later when you can actually make a point.
Look I did not compare statues of Confederate Generals who lead forces against the United States of Americas to defend the Southern Way of Life that included slavery, torture and lynching.

How fucking stupid are you? They fought for the right to lynch black people without repercussion.

Is that clear enough?


Another fucking liar


.
 
Who has a statue that tortured and lynched people?
Statures of those that supported & fought so they could enslaven, torture & lynch black people. They fought for the "Southern Mentality" of treating black people as lesser people & sat idly by as they were lynched.
If you have to move the goal post in a debate, you lost the debate. Nice try, retard. :laugh:

Why the fuck were the statues being rreoved???? Because the fought to continue slavery.

You are dumber than shit

Those statues/monuments were moved because they had been put there, usually on public property and always in high-visibility spots by the UDC as propaganda transmitters to propagate the whole "Lost Cause" revisionist history bullshit, and municipalities on whose property it had been so placed said GTFO. We've been over and over this.

That's why I asked the OP at the beginning of this thread how the same can possibly apply to MLK back in post 13. He ran away from that query, because he's an idiot.
Those removal rules would apply to MLK too though if it turns out this is true, right?

Statues are not being removed because of moral standing.
 
Well, we have seen how little evidence or truth is needed for the mob to convict Brett Kavanaugh of rape. So accusing someone of rape carries almost no weight, compared to even two years ago.
True. The rape boundary was crossed when Bill Clinton was in office. Once you've defended your guy against legitimate charges of rape it's not possible to then go after another president for allegations of the same.
The left already played the get out of jail free card.
Bill Clinton had one woman make any claim of rape & she had previously sworn under oath that it never happened.

I never voted for Bill Clinton. The worst of the accusations against Clinton came out after the election. You knew Trump was a POS & you voted for him anyhow.


The one that took a sitting president to a civil trial, that one?


Lol he had to pay Paula almost a million dollars.


.


Paula Jones accused Bill Clinton of sexual harassment.

He exposed himself & asked for sex. She said no. That is it.

NO RAPE you stupid shit. No accusation of rape.

Are you this stupid?



Ypu


Oh yeah I have to pay almost a million dollars every time a girl turns me down too
So you have zero idea what sexual harassment is. I knew you were stupid but did not realize you are really that stupid.
 
Statures of those that supported & fought so they could enslaven, torture & lynch black people. They fought for the "Southern Mentality" of treating black people as lesser people & sat idly by as they were lynched.
If you have to move the goal post in a debate, you lost the debate. Nice try, retard. :laugh:

Why the fuck were the statues being rreoved???? Because the fought to continue slavery.

You are dumber than shit

Those statues/monuments were moved because they had been put there, usually on public property and always in high-visibility spots by the UDC as propaganda transmitters to propagate the whole "Lost Cause" revisionist history bullshit, and municipalities on whose property it had been so placed said GTFO. We've been over and over this.

That's why I asked the OP at the beginning of this thread how the same can possibly apply to MLK back in post 13. He ran away from that query, because he's an idiot.
Those removal rules would apply to MLK too though if it turns out this is true, right?

Statues are not being removed because of moral standing.
What the fuck are you talking about? How stupid does one have to be to make such a moronic comment like that? Why are you trying so hard to convince us youre retarded?
 

Forum List

Back
Top