Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hey boxer dog, What country are we in and what year is it? In your mind that is.
the history of labor unions has been intimately entwined with the history of global communism. As the influential Dutch astronomer and Marxist theorist Anton Pannekoek wrote in his 1908 treatise, The Labor Movement and Socialism, The object of the labor movement is to increase the strength of the proletariat to the point at which it can conquer the organized force of the bourgeoisie and thus establish its own supremacy.
Vladimir Lenin agreed and made unions an integral part of the peoples republic he founded in 1917. Shakedown Socialism author Oleg Atbashian, a propagandist for the Soviet Union before he migrated the United States in 1994, writes that in the Soviet Union, organized labor was part of the official establishment and union membership was universal and mandatory and that systems seemingly magnanimous goals - fairness, economic equality and social justice - in real life brought forth a rigged game of wholesale corruption, forced inequality and grotesque injustice.
Hmm, sounds a lot like what unions have inflicted upon the United States: wholesale corruption as many union chapters have historically acted as fronts for organized crime; forced inequality as unionized public employees out-earn their counterparts in the private sector; grotesque injustice as greedy unions strong-armed lavish salaries and benefits for themselves that bust the budgets of entire states, forcing non-union folks to suffer higher taxes and fewer services.
PATTERSON: Labor unions and communism - Washington Times
the history of labor unions has been intimately entwined with the history of global communism. As the influential Dutch astronomer and Marxist theorist Anton Pannekoek wrote in his 1908 treatise, The Labor Movement and Socialism, The object of the labor movement is to increase the strength of the proletariat to the point at which it can conquer the organized force of the bourgeoisie and thus establish its own supremacy.
Vladimir Lenin agreed and made unions an integral part of the peoples republic he founded in 1917. Shakedown Socialism author Oleg Atbashian, a propagandist for the Soviet Union before he migrated the United States in 1994, writes that in the Soviet Union, organized labor was part of the official establishment and union membership was universal and mandatory and that systems seemingly magnanimous goals - fairness, economic equality and social justice - in real life brought forth a rigged game of wholesale corruption, forced inequality and grotesque injustice.
Hmm, sounds a lot like what unions have inflicted upon the United States: wholesale corruption as many union chapters have historically acted as fronts for organized crime; forced inequality as unionized public employees out-earn their counterparts in the private sector; grotesque injustice as greedy unions strong-armed lavish salaries and benefits for themselves that bust the budgets of entire states, forcing non-union folks to suffer higher taxes and fewer services.
PATTERSON: Labor unions and communism - Washington Times
Isnt it amazing that they expect people not to notice how a Union is structured? Or that is is amazing just like a communist political structure? Maybe many are to young to know politburo.
the history of labor unions has been intimately entwined with the history of global communism. As the influential Dutch astronomer and Marxist theorist Anton Pannekoek wrote in his 1908 treatise, The Labor Movement and Socialism, The object of the labor movement is to increase the strength of the proletariat to the point at which it can conquer the organized force of the bourgeoisie and thus establish its own supremacy.
Vladimir Lenin agreed and made unions an integral part of the peoples republic he founded in 1917. Shakedown Socialism author Oleg Atbashian, a propagandist for the Soviet Union before he migrated the United States in 1994, writes that in the Soviet Union, organized labor was part of the official establishment and union membership was universal and mandatory and that systems seemingly magnanimous goals - fairness, economic equality and social justice - in real life brought forth a rigged game of wholesale corruption, forced inequality and grotesque injustice.
Hmm, sounds a lot like what unions have inflicted upon the United States: wholesale corruption as many union chapters have historically acted as fronts for organized crime; forced inequality as unionized public employees out-earn their counterparts in the private sector; grotesque injustice as greedy unions strong-armed lavish salaries and benefits for themselves that bust the budgets of entire states, forcing non-union folks to suffer higher taxes and fewer services.
PATTERSON: Labor unions and communism - Washington Times
Isnt it amazing that they expect people not to notice how a Union is structured? Or that is is amazing just like a communist political structure? Maybe many are to young to know politburo.
Hey boxer dog. Fuk you.
What about the year we are in and the country we are in.
Are you so fuking stupid that you don't know the year and the country? You got any evidence that todays unions are communist. If not, shut the fuk up.
What a fuking asshole you are. No ifs ands or buts about it.
Hey boxer dog. Fuk you.
What about the year we are in and the country we are in.
Are you so fuking stupid that you don't know the year and the country? You got any evidence that todays unions are communist. If not, shut the fuk up.
What a fuking asshole you are. No ifs ands or buts about it.
Hey boxer dog. Fuk you.
What about the year we are in and the country we are in.
Are you so fuking stupid that you don't know the year and the country? You got any evidence that todays unions are communist. If not, shut the fuk up.
What a fuking asshole you are. No ifs ands or buts about it.
So we should ignore the history of the communist organization and still ignore the socialist organizations that still support it cause you say it doesn't mater? I am sorry but some of us like using our brain.
Silver is spot on...........4 years from now, the economy wil still be in the shitter and the hopelessly duped will still be saying, "We're still digging out of this Bush mess!!!"
You mean like the delusion of higher taxes and more spending is a good thing for the economy?
You mean like the delusion of higher taxes and more spending is a good thing for the economy?
The opposite is not true either. You can not simply tax cut your way into prosperity. The Great State of Louisiana has cratered its tax revenue at this point and is still looking a possibly 1 billion dollar budget short fall in the Summer. The State healthcare, education system, and physical infrastructure are so laughably bad that no company in their right mind wants to relocate there and the educated citizens that can find jobs out of state are leaving as fast as they can. There are literally no taxes left to cut to draw folks back in.
Growing an economy requires an investment in basic infrastructure and social services, and that does indeed require spending and taxes. It is very definitely possible to kill development by under taxing and under spending. Just come move to my state and you'll see it happening now.
I am guessing so cause history said otherwise.You mean like the delusion of higher taxes and more spending is a good thing for the economy?
The opposite is not true either. You can not simply tax cut your way into prosperity. The Great State of Louisiana has cratered its tax revenue at this point and is still looking a possibly 1 billion dollar budget short fall in the Summer. The State healthcare, education system, and physical infrastructure are so laughably bad that no company in their right mind wants to relocate there and the educated citizens that can find jobs out of state are leaving as fast as they can. There are literally no taxes left to cut to draw folks back in.
Growing an economy requires an investment in basic infrastructure and social services, and that does indeed require spending and taxes. It is very definitely possible to kill development by under taxing and under spending. Just come move to my state and you'll see it happening now.
Says...... you?
So we should ignore the history of the communist organization and still ignore the socialist organizations that still support it cause you say it doesn't mater? I am sorry but some of us like using our brain.
Says...... you?
So we should ignore the history of the communist organization and still ignore the socialist organizations that still support it cause you say it doesn't mater? I am sorry but some of us like using our brain.
So we should ignore some of the worst abuses of Capitalism, such as poisoning communities, water supplies, and air, or abusive child labor practices, or knowingly selling unsafe products, or knowingly operating unsafe mines and factories....
Unions were created by workers in response to some pretty terrible practices, and like it or not they have improved the general working environment for a vast majority of people. They have their excesses, but so does unregulated and un-supervised industry. Sometimes the balance tips too far one way or another, in the end it generally gets balanced back out.
I am guessing so cause history said otherwise.
Says...... you?
Says reality. Come move to Lousiana. Good luck finding a job, though at least you won't pay crap in taxes on anything.
The end of the game is revenue. Right now, states like Texas and Alaska can afford to have low tax rates because they have large amounts of non-tax revenue. Louisiana to some extent has that too, but they've cut so deep they can't even maintain the Hospitals, schools, and roads here. And the businesses are reacting by leaving.
So we all should be communist cause a few assholes? Sorry not buying it. If you dont like your job quit.
So we all should be communist cause a few assholes? Sorry not buying it. If you dont like your job quit.
See, this is why no one is taking you seriously. You just jumped from one extreme to the next and made assumptions (and an ass of yourself) by assuming I was of an extremist point of view.
I am definitely not in favor of requiring Union membership for employment. I definitely am in favor of allowing Unions to exist and collectively negotiate. I'd much rather have a world with Unions for workers that feel they're being treated unfairly than a world without it.
And for the record, a few assholes can kill or injure a hell of a lot of people. This is why we regulate stuff in the first place in the markets. It's why the FDA, EPA, and other organizations exist. It's definitely why Unions exist.