Should we test all future candidates by Obama?

SuperDemocrat

Gold Member
Mar 4, 2015
8,200
868
275
should future candidates be judged by how much they supported Obama? We need to get a list of times a candidate has criticized Obama and weed out the week and less loyal people of the party.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
should future candidates be judged by how much they supported Obama? We need to get a list of times a candidate has criticized Obama and weed out the week and less loyal people of the party.
"weed out the week" lol

You sound like the typical low IQ Obamabot retard. ..... :lol: :lol:

I only trust autocorrect since autocorrect is done by experts. How can the experts be wrong?
 
should future candidates be judged by how much they supported Obama? We need to get a list of times a candidate has criticized Obama and weed out the week and less loyal people of the party.
Of course all Presidents in the future should be measured against Obama!

Whenever they go golfing, there should be outrage. Whenever their wife goes on vacation, there should be apoplexy. After every Thanksgiving speech, it should be claimed they never mentioned God, even if they did. If anything, anywhere, any time goes wrong in America, the President is to be blamed. If any government employee anywhere commits a crime, it should be immediately stated that the President ordered the crime be committed. If gas prices go up, the President must be blamed. If gas prices go down, the President gets no credit. The same is true for milk, eggs, hamburgers, and Post-It® Notes. If the President issues an Executive Order, we should demand his impeachment. If the President wants to bomb another country, we should oppose him. If the President does not want to bomb another country, we should demand he do so right away. But we should always, always, always wait and see what the President wants to do first, and then say he should do the opposite. Then, if terrorists blow something up, or take some territory, we should say it was because the President did or didn't bomb the other country like we said he should or shouldn't have. If any Americans are killed overseas by terrorists, we should have a permanent standing committee investigate it, and we should invent a mountain of manufactured bullshit about the events surrounding the incident. If the President says it's a nice day, we should scream about what a terrible day it is.

If the President enters negotiations with another country, we should send a letter out to the whole world telling everyone that whatever our President says doesn't mean shit.

And we should constantly hope that the economy will get worse, that the unemployment figure will rise, and that the labor force participation rate will plummet. We should experience glee over every piece of bad news for our country. People losing jobs should get us excited. And if the unemployment rate goes down, we should say it is still going up. We should spout the most ridiculous, ignorant, stupid economic claims possible whenever there is the slightest bit of positive economic news. If good economic news comes out, we should bring up some tired scandal completely unrelated to the economy, or find some economic problem which has been around since long before the President took office and blame him for it.

If there is a choice between fixing an unforeseen problem in a law or causing a constitutional crisis, we should go for the constitutional crisis. We should also support 56 votes for repeal of the President's signature legislation. And we damn sure better howl and wail and gnash our teeth over the continuing deficit spending.
 
Last edited:
obama-kool-aid-batch.jpg
 
If only Obama were an R, he would have been impeached and removed from office.

But...since he is black and a D, he is above the law and apparently many Americans are fine with this.
 

Forum List

Back
Top