Should This Guy Really Go To Jail For Defending Himself From A Thug??

[The Sage of Main Street]

No. If the perp was leaving, he had no legal right to shoot after him, because at that point it was no longer self-defense.

What Part of "The Security of a Free State" Don't You Understand?

He has a civic duty to prevent a predator from going out to do the same thing to others that was done to him. "Selfish revenge" protects us all.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Why do black people scare you so much that you want to hide from them?

The Third World War Will Be Against the Third World

We won't live free until jungle races live in fear. They need to go back to the shadows and stay there.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

He didnt shoot at the wrong car the girl caught a stray bullet when he missed his intended target.
They need to charge the robber with murder just like they do criminals that take part in robberies where there's a fatality whether they pulled the trigger or not.
But the shooter is ultimately responsible for shooting and not paying attention to whats behind his target.

There Are No Non-Combatants in a Combat Zone

The innocent have to pay for allowing criminals to survive.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

There Are No Non-Combatants in a Combat Zone

The innocent have to pay for allowing criminals to survive.

I'd bet that little girl would beg to differ.
Knowing whats behind your target is a standard firearm safety rule.

 

[hadit]

What Part of "The Security of a Free State" Don't You Understand?

He has a civic duty to prevent a predator from going out to do the same thing to others that was done to him. "Selfish revenge" protects us all.

That's not the way the law works. Even the police do not shoot after a fleeing suspect, for this very reason.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Short answer. Hell yes. You are personally liable for every round you shoot. They drilled that into us during CHL training.

 

[hadit]

The Third World War Will Be Against the Third World

We won't live free until jungle races live in fear. They need to go back to the shadows and stay there.

Hate to tell you this, but they're not going to do that.

 

[Batcat]

No. If the perp was leaving, he had no legal right to shoot after him, because at that point it was no longer self-defense.

It often amazes me how few people realize this.

 

[hadit]

There Are No Non-Combatants in a Combat Zone

The innocent have to pay for allowing criminals to survive.

Be sure to tell the jury that. Let us know what they say.

 

[hadit]

It often amazes me how few people realize this.

Those are the ones who should not be armed.

 

[hadit]

Better to see thousands of kids get shot than give up a single gun to the fascist state. Hope this brave citizen gets to appear zt CPAC before he gets locked up.

Keep rambling, you might find a cogent thought in there somewhere.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

If he couldn't fire at the thief without endangering the public he shouldn't have fired.

It's called situational awareness.

Is a little girl's life worth the 2oo bucks he lost?

Firing in self defense has to be reserved for when your life or physical well being is on the line. A guy running away after snatching your wallet is no longer a threat to your life or physical safety

Revenge Is Part of Civilized Society's Survival Instinct

Not killing the thief is what endangers the public. Logically, the girl was the victim of the thief, who created the situation.

Her parents shouldn't have been driving in such a dangerous neighborhood. They are not innocent if they vote for the Democratic thug-huggers, so there is no such thing as a "law-abiding person of color."

 

[hadit]

Better that the robber gets away unharmed than to wound or kill an innocent bystander. Self-defense means self-defense. Rittenhouse, just for one example, killed some people in self-defense and was acquitted for it. He did not chase after them, shooting into the night. The vigilantes were chasing him, trying to kill him. Their actions were NOT in self-defense. This guy, OTOH, will be charged with a crime and probably be convicted. I hope this makes it all a little clearer for the terminally ill-informed.

 

[hadit]

He's trying to be slick, and he's about as slick as a mouse glue trap.

Certainly not snot on the doorknob slick, which I think was his goal. Kind of a weird goal, but hey, to each his own.

 

[hadit]

If he couldn't fire at the thief without endangering the public he shouldn't have fired.

It's called situational awareness.

Is a little girl's life worth the 2oo bucks he lost?

Firing in self defense has to be reserved for when your life or physical well being is on the line. A guy running away after snatching your wallet is no longer a threat to your life or physical safety

Had the robber had him at gunpoint, he would have been justified in shooting. After he started running away, not so much.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I'd bet that little girl would beg to differ.
Knowing what's behind your target is a standard firearm safety rule.

In the Jungle, Black Lives Have Never Mattered, and That's What They've Brought Here

Thugs first use those pickaninnies as shields before they turn them into hos.

 

[mak2]

He should go to jail. He is the thug and guys like him make responsible gun owners look bad.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

That's not the way the law works. Even the police do not shoot after a fleeing suspect, for this very reason.

Criminals Are Enemies of the Human Race

Laws in a society with a Death Wish just accelerate its suicide.

 

[hadit]

In the Jungle, Black Lives Have Never Mattered, and That's What They've Brought Here

Thugs first use those pickaninnies as shields before they turn them into hos.

Depending on how old you are, you may actually live to see the day when your kind is virtually extinct. There will be maybe five of you left in the nursing home, watching the world pass you by.

 

[mak2]

Criminals Are Enemies of the Human Race

Laws in a society with a Death Wish just accelerate its suicide.

Please explain the rules for use of deadly force in your ideal society.