Should This Guy Really Go To Jail For Defending Himself From A Thug??

If it wasn't poverty, what was it??

Being dark people??

Or is that too blatant on the racism scale?

Let's just blame it on Democrats.....deal?

Which would also mean that the color of the criminals shouldn't matter -- since Democrats causes people to be criminals no matter their color right?
“Poverty” is an awesome FEEL good THEORY / crutch for dark people to use as a tool....but how do you ignore the comparatives? You know, those pesky facts?
NOPE...poverty didn't make them criminals....evidenced in all white extremely poor Appalachia.

"There's not much violent crime here. There's a bit of the usual enterprise one finds everywhere there are drugs and poor people, which is to say, everywhere. But even the crime here is pretty well predictable. The police chief's assistant notes that if they know the nature and location of a particular crime, they can more or less drive straight to the perpetrator.

There's a great deal of drug use, welfare fraud, and the like, but the overall crime rate throughout Appalachia is about two thirds the national average, and the rate of violent crime is half the national average."

theweek.com





Appalachia: The big white ghetto

In Appalachia, jobs have vanished, and people live for pills, soda pop, and welfare
theweek.com
 
Don't take him seriously. He's just trolling, trying to put 2nd Amendment supporters in a difficult position, assuming they will always support the use of a firearm. Like I said, trolling.
That is all he knows. It looks like his thread is backfiring big time!
 
Dark people can’t afford the community dues where I live…..THANK GOD!
you forgot dumbass i used to live in s.cal....i delivered to a section of the Anaheim Hills with million dollar houses....lots of brown rich people there....try your bullshit on people who live in other States....i know better...
 


"A man who had just been robbed at gunpoint at an ATM in southeast Houston opened fire in an attempt to stop his attacker but instead shot and wounded a 9-year-old girl in a truck driving nearby, police said. The girl remained hospitalized in critical condition after the shooting Monday evening, police said. [She later died]. The 41-year-old man who shot her was arrested and is expected to be charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, police said in a statement Tuesday.

She is the second 9-year-old girl to be shot in Houston within a week. Ashanti Grant remains hospitalized after being shot in the head during a road rage attack Feb. 8. In Monday’s shooting, the man and his wife were at the ATM at around 9:45 p.m. when another man walked up to their vehicle and robbed them at gunpoint, Slinkard said. As the suspect fled on foot, the man got out of his vehicle and opened fire, including at a pickup truck he thought the robbery suspect had climbed into, police said. But the truck carrying a family of five was not involved and had been “simply driving” down a street near the ATM, Slinkard said."


On one hand, you would want a man to be able to defend himself, his family and his property from criminals..so he had every right to go after this guy...however, he made the mistake of shooting at the wrong car...and a little girl got it.... It was an honest mistake, is it not? Sometimes you have collateral damage when there is a war...and there is a war on crime going on right now; this guy was just fighting back....he had to make a split second decision and this accident happened...Should he be charged with murder/manslaughter or no?

If he is ultimately charged with murder, won't this send the wrong message to the rest of us?? For example, you see someone trying to rob a person..and running off with that person's property....you shoot at the robber to try to stop his escape...and one of the bullets hit someone else - why should the law-biding citizen be charged in that scenario??

Your shooter is not a law abiding citizen. The robber did not force the shooting.

According to your linked story. The shooter intentionally shot at the truck he believed the robber might have gotten into.

That is not a justified use of force. It is not a valid use of self defense. It was an angry child with a gun shooting wildly into the night in rage.
 
Things like this happen far less often than the bad guy going down all on his own.

And before you think Police don't fuck up like this either:

NYPD: 9 shooting bystander victims hit by police gunfire

And cops are now being charged for fucking up and shooting the innocent.


The times. They are a changing.
 
I think the girl died

you were not there so dont so sure of your snap judgements

The robbers had left him alone and have moved away, then he got his gun and shot at them, shooting a 9 year old in his attempt to be John McLain. What more is there to know?
 
He did not force the shooter to shoot, that was the free choice of the shooter.

He robbed the shooter, a criminal act, leading to the shooting. His felony armed robbery led to the girls death.

Get em both, but get the first guy harder.
 
He robbed the shooter, a criminal act, leading to the shooting.

He robbed the shooter and then was moving away form the shooter. There was no longer any imminent threat when the shots were fired. This puts the fault of the girls shooting on the shooter, not the robber.
 
He robbed the shooter and then was moving away form the shooter. There was no longer any imminent threat when the shots were fired. This puts the fault of the girls shooting on the shooter, not the robber.

He started the chain, he gets some of the pain.

This wasn't hours later, it was right after the perpetration of the crime.
 
He started the chain, he gets some of the pain.

This wasn't hours later, it was right after the perpetration of the crime.

I am not sure about where this took place, but in many (maybe even most) states the shooter could have been charged with murder if he had hit the thief since there was no danger to him any longer
 
Exactly. The threat was no longer there but still he opened fire which resulted in a death. Like you said he will most likely be convicted.

And that's why post 9/11 I cringed every time I had to walk through Grand Central Station and had NYC and State police, US military and others standing armed ready to fire at Lord knows what
 


"A man who had just been robbed at gunpoint at an ATM in southeast Houston opened fire in an attempt to stop his attacker but instead shot and wounded a 9-year-old girl in a truck driving nearby, police said. The girl remained hospitalized in critical condition after the shooting Monday evening, police said. [She later died]. The 41-year-old man who shot her was arrested and is expected to be charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, police said in a statement Tuesday.

She is the second 9-year-old girl to be shot in Houston within a week. Ashanti Grant remains hospitalized after being shot in the head during a road rage attack Feb. 8. In Monday’s shooting, the man and his wife were at the ATM at around 9:45 p.m. when another man walked up to their vehicle and robbed them at gunpoint, Slinkard said. As the suspect fled on foot, the man got out of his vehicle and opened fire, including at a pickup truck he thought the robbery suspect had climbed into, police said. But the truck carrying a family of five was not involved and had been “simply driving” down a street near the ATM, Slinkard said."


On one hand, you would want a man to be able to defend himself, his family and his property from criminals..so he had every right to go after this guy...however, he made the mistake of shooting at the wrong car...and a little girl got it.... It was an honest mistake, is it not? Sometimes you have collateral damage when there is a war...and there is a war on crime going on right now; this guy was just fighting back....he had to make a split second decision and this accident happened...Should he be charged with murder/manslaughter or no?

If he is ultimately charged with murder, won't this send the wrong message to the rest of us?? For example, you see someone trying to rob a person..and running off with that person's property....you shoot at the robber to try to stop his escape...and one of the bullets hit someone else - why should the law-biding citizen be charged in that scenario??

He didnt shoot at the wrong car the girl caught a stray bullet when he missed his intended target.
They need to charge the robber with murder just like they do criminals that take part in robberies where there's a fatality whether they pulled the trigger or not.
But the shooter is ultimately responsible for shooting and not paying attention to whats behind his target.
 

Forum List

Back
Top