- Thread starter
- #61
Yes. But not at a federal level. The States should take care of that and do.
why should they outlaw it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. But not at a federal level. The States should take care of that and do.
Saw this discussed somewhere else and I think its a good measure of how much you think the government should be able to control people's life. Of course we are talking about two consenting adults and this has nothing to do with marriage.
EDIT: I voted yes
Ame®icano;2202631 said:Saw this discussed somewhere else and I think its a good measure of how much you think the government should be able to control people's life. Of course we are talking about two consenting adults and this has nothing to do with marriage.
EDIT: I voted yes
I don't care if your vote is based on personal preferences, but if you insist to get an explanation why someone voted "no" you should be first to give an explanation why you voted "yes".
Yes. But not at a federal level. The States should take care of that and do.
why should they outlaw it?
Ame®icano;2202631 said:Saw this discussed somewhere else and I think its a good measure of how much you think the government should be able to control people's life. Of course we are talking about two consenting adults and this has nothing to do with marriage.
EDIT: I voted yes
I don't care if your vote is based on personal preferences, but if you insist to get an explanation why someone voted "no" you should be first to give an explanation why you voted "yes".
I voted yes b/c except for what saveliberty brought up (which I hadn't thought of when I voted yes originally) the act affects no other people, including any formed baby and its potential birth defects, as common stuff such as women over 40 having kids, results in much higher rates of birth defect. Since it affects no other people and its between consenting adults, the governmetn has 0 reason or basis to outlaw it.
not a leftistAme®icano;2202712 said:I kinda get used to questions about morality coming from the left.[/B]
immoral because I said they weren't married or because all religions that I know of ban it?Ame®icano;2202712 said:First because of immorality
Ame®icano;2202712 said:third because I believe that Incest is one of those "power things" and I don't think it can ever be truly consensual. The blood relation in between the parties would make that almost impossible.
Should Beastiallity be legal?
No deformed offspring.
Consenting adults.
Sheep over 40 have deformed lambs anyway.
Should Beastiallity be legal?
No deformed offspring.
Consenting adults.
Sheep over 40 have deformed lambs anyway.
can animals consent? no. nice try though
for me personally, it's REALLY wrong...but if the political control aspect is what you're after, I would rather not see government have control over who you decide to hookup with. If you want to sleep with your cousin, your mom...your brother....whew...gay incest...(shutter)...that's you own sick and demented parogative.
No. Incest is one of those universal societal taboos.Saw this discussed somewhere else and I think its a good measure of how much you think the government should be able to control people's life. Of course we are talking about two consenting adults and this has nothing to do with marriage.
EDIT: I voted yes
not a leftistAme®icano;2202712 said:I kinda get used to questions about morality coming from the left.[/B]
immoral because I said they weren't married or because all religions that I know of ban it?Ame®icano;2202712 said:First because of immorality
Ame®icano;2202712 said:third because I believe that Incest is one of those "power things" and I don't think it can ever be truly consensual. The blood relation in between the parties would make that almost impossible.
how would between cousins have to be power play? between father/daughter, mom/son whateverI could definately see that though
I love how the republicans are answering no.
Stay out of my life, but please tell someone else who they can have sex with.
I love how the republicans are answering no.
Stay out of my life, but please tell someone else who they can have sex with.
But did you notice how the most liberal states, at least those mtntioned, like MA and HI had very strict laws?
I love how the republicans are answering no.
Stay out of my life, but please tell someone else who they can have sex with.
But did you notice how the most liberal states, at least those mtntioned, like MA and HI had very strict laws?
We don't pretend to be about limited government.
I just get sick of some republican saying they want the government out of their lies, bthen turning around and telling someone else what to do with their body, and who they should marry.
If someone is 18, one should be able to choose who they have sex with. The tricky part is the offspring.
I'm not interested in busting into the bedroom of a couple of relatives going at it. I assume they want to keep it quiet as well.
This really is a non-issue.