Should Churches be forced to accomodate for homosexual weddings?

[Silhouette]

No

Churches should not be forced to accommodate those weddings.

Those homosexuals weddings.

Why should they?

Should individual Christians be forced to accommodate those weddings?

 

[mdk]

No

Churches should not be forced to accommodate those weddings.

Those homosexuals weddings.

Why should they?

Should individual Christians be forced to accommodate those weddings?

No, should an Evangelical Baptist be forced to accommodate a Catholic wedding?

 

[Silhouette]

No

Churches should not be forced to accommodate those weddings.

Those homosexuals weddings.

Why should they?

Should individual Christians be forced to accommodate those weddings?

No, should an Evangelical Baptist be forced to accommodate a Catholic wedding?

I'm glad you finally made the comparison of LGBT to a religion/behavioral cult. Finally.

Now that you've done that, please point to the Constitution where Obergefell is legitimate. And then show me where the Court cited that passage in the Obergefell Opinion.

 

[mdk]

I'm glad you finally made the comparison of LGBT to a religion/behavioral cult. Finally.

Hardly. You didn't answer my question?

 

[HenryBHough]

Save your bacon fat. You'll need it to grease your ammo when Muslims figure out that forcing churches to perform queer weddings also requires mosques perform them too AND host ham 'n bean reception feasts in their community halls after each wedding. Force one religion to do stuff and you force ALL religions to do stuff. Right now, were that to come to The Supreme Court, it's a tossup as to how it would come down. But in a very few short weeks.......

Suck it up buttercups and grease up 'cause it's coming and it's coming hard and fast.

 

[Silhouette]

Save your bacon fat. You'll need it to grease your ammo when Muslims figure out that forcing churches to perform queer weddings also requires mosques perform them too AND host ham 'n bean reception feasts in their community halls after each wedding. Force one religion to do stuff and you force ALL religions to do stuff. Right now, were that to come to The Supreme Court, it's a tossup as to how it would come down. But in a very few short weeks.......

Suck it up buttercups and grease up 'cause it's coming and it's coming hard and fast.

What it amounts to is forcing one religion to practice another religion against their faith. Since LGBT is a cult of deviant sex behaviors and not "race" or "gender". (See Hively v Ivy Tech 2016)

And BTW, this applies also to individual Christians and PA laws because the 1st Amendment doesn't come with GPS coordinations or a time clock.

 

[mdk]

What it amounts to is forcing one religion to practice another religion against their faith. Since LGBT is a cult of deviant sex behaviors and not "race" or "gender". (See Hively v Ivy Tech 2016)

And BTW, this applies also to individual Christians and PA laws because the 1st Amendment doesn't come with GPS coordinations or a time clock.

No, should an Evangelical Baptist be forced to accommodate a Catholic wedding? Keep running...

 

[Silhouette]

What it amounts to is forcing one religion to practice another religion against their faith. Since LGBT is a cult of deviant sex behaviors and not "race" or "gender". (See Hively v Ivy Tech 2016)

And BTW, this applies also to individual Christians and PA laws because the 1st Amendment doesn't come with GPS coordinations or a time clock.

No, should an Evangelical Baptist be forced to accommodate a Catholic wedding? Keep running...

1. You made no point with your post and 2. You supported my contention that the same outrage that applies to forcing one religion to practice another's faith (or in the case of LGBT, a cult-faith of deviant sex), should apply to forcing individual Christians to do the same. Again, the 1st Amendment doesn't come with GPS coordinates or a time clock.

 

[mdk]

What it amounts to is forcing one religion to practice another religion against their faith. Since LGBT is a cult of deviant sex behaviors and not "race" or "gender". (See Hively v Ivy Tech 2016)

And BTW, this applies also to individual Christians and PA laws because the 1st Amendment doesn't come with GPS coordinations or a time clock.

No, should an Evangelical Baptist be forced to accommodate a Catholic wedding? Keep running...

1. You made no point with your post and 2. You supported my contention that the same outrage that applies to forcing one religion to practice another's faith (or in the case of LGBT, a cult-faith of deviant sex), should apply to forcing individual Christians to do the same. Again, the 1st Amendment doesn't come with GPS coordinates or a time clock.

Can't answer the question can you? We both know. Should a Baptist be forced to accommodate a Catholic wedding?

 

[Silhouette]

Nobody should be forced to practice the faith of any other religion or cult. Hence why Christians cannot be forced to promote Obergefell's illegal "gay marriage" mandate. Thankfully it will be overturned in the next 4 years. So..can't wait for that.

 

[mdk]

Nobody should be forced to practice the faith of any other religion or cult. Hence why Christians cannot be forced to promote Obergefell's illegal "gay marriage" mandate. Thankfully it will be overturned in the next 4 years. So..can't wait for that.

With the your going prediction rate the exact opposite will likely occur.

 

[Silhouette]

Nobody should be forced to practice the faith of any other religion or cult. Hence why Christians cannot be forced to promote Obergefell's illegal "gay marriage" mandate. Thankfully it will be overturned in the next 4 years. So..can't wait for that.

With the your going prediction rate the exact opposite will likely occur.

You think now that Pence/Trump are in power? You think less rights for Christians will be upheld? You are optimistic aren't you? lol..

 

[mdk]

Nobody should be forced to practice the faith of any other religion or cult. Hence why Christians cannot be forced to promote Obergefell's illegal "gay marriage" mandate. Thankfully it will be overturned in the next 4 years. So..can't wait for that.

With the your going prediction rate the exact opposite will likely occur.

You think now that Pence/Trump are in power? You think less rights for Christians will be upheld? You are optimistic aren't you? lol..

You voted for Hillary b/c Trump was too pro-gay. lol

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Hitler created a new dictionary for his New Reicht too. Doesn't mean sane folks are required to reference it when describing reality...

If homosexuality doesn't exist then what have you pissing and moaning about for the last decade? Seems odd you would dedicate so much time and effort to something that doesn't exist.

Next Unicorn Word: "Pedosexuality"

It doesn't exist as a sexuality. Instead, homo "sexuality" is a dangerous and self-destructive mental disease.

 

[Silhouette]

"Next"? I think Keven Jennings, Obama's education czar got some serious inroads going when he set out to approve teaching "anal fisting" to boys in public schools. Gotta loosen up those peg boys for adult-sized sexual organs!

 

[WillReadmore]

"Next"? I think Keven Jennings, Obama's education czar got some serious inroads going when he set out to approve teaching "anal fisting" to boys in public schools. Gotta loosen up those peg boys for adult-sized sexual organs!

You are a liar and a pervert.

'Nough said.

 

[Syriusly]

Eunuch Horn

Sex is between a man and a woman, so there is no such thing as "homosexuality."

Ignore the dictionary at your own peril.

Hitler ...

Automatic fail from the homophobic bigot.

 

[Syriusly]

Nobody should be forced to practice the faith of any other religion or cult. t.

And no one is.

Despite all of your efforts to require religious obediance

 

[Syriusly]

Hitler created a new dictionary for his New Reicht too. Doesn't mean sane folks are required to reference it when describing reality...

If homosexuality doesn't exist then what have you pissing and moaning about for the last decade? Seems odd you would dedicate so much time and effort to something that doesn't exist.

Next Unicorn Word: "Pedosexuality"

It doesn't exist as a sexuality. Instead, homo "sexuality" is a dangerous and self-destructive mental disease.

And this is based upon your expertise as a doctor and your intensive research into making up new words.

 

[Silhouette]

I see Syriusly is back to spamming pages into oblivion again when points are made she doesn't like.