Should Churches be forced to accomodate for homosexual weddings?

[RWHeathenGamer]

This question can apply to all places of worship, so mosques, synagogues, hindu temples etc.

Should places or worship be forced to accommodate for gay weddings?

 

[KNB]

The First Amendment forbids public law from forcing anything on religious institutions, just as it forbids religious institutions from imposing their will on the public.

 

[RWHeathenGamer]

The First Amendment forbids public law from forcing anything on religious institutions, just as it forbids religious institutions from imposing their will on the public.

So churches should have the right to discriminate against homosexuals?

How about against racial minorities as well?

 

[Peach]

The First Amendment forbids public law from forcing anything on religious institutions, just as it forbids religious institutions from imposing their will on the public.

Yes, and the answer is "NO".

 

[Katzndogz]

This question can apply to all places of worship, so mosques, synagogues, hindu temples etc.

Should places or worship be forced to accommodate for gay weddings?

That will become the same battleground here as it is now in England.

 

[KNB]

Churches should burn in Hell because religion is the single greatest lie in all of human history.

 

[koshergrl]

When the state seeks to impose its will upon the churches of the land, bloodshed is a heartbeat away.

No. In our country, the state does not have the authority to dictate what the church must *allow*.

 

[koshergrl]

And the state never will have that authority. Regardless of what the progressive admin attempts to force upon us. The churches will prevail, and Christians will die before they will give up that right. And I'm sure progressive scum will have no qualms about killing them. They never have.

 

[Clementine]

Churches should burn in Hell because religion is the single greatest lie in all of human history.

Do you include mosques in that sentiment?

 

[Ibentoken]

The First Amendment forbids public law from forcing anything on religious institutions, just as it forbids religious institutions from imposing their will on the public.

I agree. Those who holler "Separation of church and state" appear to forget that when it comes to pushing their agenda. Hypocrites.

 

[koshergrl]

It has been tried many times before.

Historically, when the state has sought authority over the church, the leaders will do it in the name of this religion or that..but it is always the state that is exerting the authority. Thus the horrific bloody persecutions of the past are a result not of Christianity attempting to establish itself (this is what our school children come out of school believing, based on the half-formed claptrap they hear from their illiterate teachers) but have been a result of a state body exerting force over the church.

", Soviet authorities suppressed and persecuted various forms of Christianity to different extents depending on the particular era. Soviet policy, based on the ideology of Marxism-Leninism, made atheism the official doctrine of the Soviet Union. Marxism-Leninism has consistently advocated the control, suppression, and the elimination of religious beliefs.[1]

The state was committed to the destruction of religion,[2][3] and destroyed churches, mosques and temples, ridiculed, harassed and executed religious leaders, flooded the schools and media with atheistic teachings, and generally promoted atheism as the truth that society should accept.[4][5] The total number of Christian victims of Soviet state atheist policies, has been estimated to range between 12-20 millions.[6][7][8]

Religious beliefs and practices persisted among the majority of the population,[4] in the domestic and private spheres but also in the scattered public spaces allowed by a state that recognised its failure to eradicate religion and the political dangers of an unrelenting culture war."

Persecution of Christians in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Of course, nobody has ever done it so well as atheists.

 

[Ibentoken]

Churches should burn in Hell because religion is the single greatest lie in all of human history.

If you were king of the USA would you close all churches?

 

[shart_attack]

This question can apply to all places of worship, so mosques, synagogues, hindu temples etc.

Should places or worship be forced to accommodate for gay weddings?

That will become the same battleground here as it is now in England.

Meanwhile you are actually letting some Muslims practice Sharia Law there.

I don't think their birthrate will wane anytime soon.

 

[RWHeathenGamer]

Churches should burn in Hell because religion is the single greatest lie in all of human history.

What if they married gays and wore rainbow robes, would you spare them?

Also, you burning churches reminded me of the spanish civil war, kind of funny how far the modern left has fallen. You anarchists used to burn down churches and fight fascists on the front lines, now the closet thing you get to a fight is challenging a transphobic comment on an internet forum.

 

[RWHeathenGamer]

When the state seeks to impose its will upon the churches of the land, bloodshed is a heartbeat away.

No. In our country, the state does not have the authority to dictate what the church must *allow*.

So if churches should be allowed refuse to marry homosexuals couples, should they be allowed to refuse to marry mixed race couples if it goes against their doctrine?

 

[Peach]

Churches should burn in Hell because religion is the single greatest lie in all of human history.

"Religion" is one matter, faith in God is a separate subject.

 

[KNB]

Churches should burn in Hell because religion is the single greatest lie in all of human history.

Do you include mosques in that sentiment?

All religions. Churches, mosques and synagogues. Anyone who thinks that there is an invisible man in the sky, but especially anyone who is willing to kill to prove just how much their invisible man in the sky loves us. You find them in every culture.

Christians, Muslims and Jews all pray to the One True Invisible Man in the Sky. They only kill each other over what name to call it. And they pollute and poison God's paradise called Earth because they think that they're going to be able to sit around in Never Never Land and play harps in outer space after they die.

Human adults need to grow up and stop having imaginary friends.

 

[Ibentoken]

When the state seeks to impose its will upon the churches of the land, bloodshed is a heartbeat away.

No. In our country, the state does not have the authority to dictate what the church must *allow*.

So if churches should be allowed refuse to marry homosexuals couples, should they be allowed to refuse to marry mixed race couples if it goes against their doctrine?

Yes. Separation of church and state. Right?

 

[KNB]

Churches should burn in Hell because religion is the single greatest lie in all of human history.

"Religion" is one matter, faith in God is a separate subject.

I agree with that. For the most part, religion is a wall between individuals and what we perceive as "God". You'll find God a lot easier when you're alone in a forest than surrounded by strange strangers in a mega-church.

 

[RWHeathenGamer]

Churches should burn in Hell because religion is the single greatest lie in all of human history.

"Religion" is one matter, faith in God is a separate subject.

I agree with that. For the most part, religion is a wall between individuals and what we perceive as "God". You'll find God a lot easier when you're alone in a forest than surrounded by strange strangers in a mega-church.

Yea MAAAN, I get real spiritual after I smoke a jay in the forest.