Senate Report Reveals Christine Blasey Ford Had an Encounter Similar to Her Kavanaugh Claim!

kissed a girl he believes was Christine Blasey Ford

She was 100% certain her abuser was Kavanaugh. She also testified under oath, and this guy believe it was her and he is not coming forward?? Why, because he or the paper made it up, that is why.

Doesn't matter, Ford lied Kavanaugh sits on the Supreme Court and America is better off for it

Another win for Trump
Ford didn't lie in her testimony before the senate, but Kavanaugh did lie before the Senate committee.

The alleged man saying it was him, is simply a made up creature trying to get his 15 minutes of fame or a PAID PLANT by the Trumpsters.... they made up a whole bunch of lies about Ford....

the safeway didn't have 2 doors lie

revenge because Kavanaugh's mom took the Balsey's home away lie...

She practiced lying for her lie detector test lie

her brother was some democratic operative lie...

she was some democratic operative lie...

and this anonymous dude claiming it was him lie... is Grassley going to recommend him to the Judicial Branch for lying?

Ford working with Soros lie...

Pictures/captions in yearbook lies...

YOU, rightwingers CREATED one lie after another about Ford... to DEFLECT from the actual truth.... why else would you all create and or pass these lies around like they were candy on Halloween?

Meanwhile Kavanaugh told one lie after another in his testimony and Grassley and Republicans give him a hi five, for LYING....

and Kavanaugh is sitting as a Justice on the Supreme court when he broke every single ethical standard and protocol for judges.

yes, every single one of them! :eek:

And YOU call that WINNING!? just plain cuckoo!

Falsehoods About Ford - FactCheck.org



and this

For a nominee to the nation’s highest court, an arms-length relationship with truth ought to be disqualifying in itself. Period.

Many Americans, whether as private citizens or in professional capacities, struggle in the modern news cycle of hot-takes, not to be mental prisoners of the moment. Last week's Senate Judiciary Hearing hearing was not mere reality TV so much as a critical inflection point for our nation’s commitment to the rule of law. It is especially important to reflect today on just how fundamental the role of Supreme Court judges are in promoting faith in the American legal system — and as such, the concept of justice itself. Where would we be as nation if that faith were to be undermined or worse, eradicated?

Socrates is widely attributed with the saying: “Four things belong to a judge: to hear courteously; to answer wisely; to consider soberly; and to decide impartially.” By this Socratic standard, Judge Brett Kavanaugh failed on all four points during his testimony last week. His remarks were completely antithetical to the values we demand from our jurists.

Exactly what happened in Bethesda, Maryland three decades ago can never be precisely known given the passage of time. What happened in Washington, D.C. mere days ago, however, was easy for reasonable persons to determine: Kavanaugh lied. Repeatedly. Under oath. Indeed, Judge Kavanaugh would never accept the rampant misrepresentations of truth that Witness Kavanaugh offered in front of U.S. senators.

Even if one takes the position that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s highly credible allegations of sexual misconduct shouldn’t derail Kavanaugh’s nomination, his response to them should. Why? Because, as many have detailed carefully and thoughtfully, he lied, misled, displayed extraordinary partisan animus straying at times toward unhinged conspiracy theorizing.

The sheer scope of Kavanaugh’s dishonesty under oath has been detailed in numerous articles, perhaps none as exquisitely comprehensive as Nathan J. Robinson’s essay in Current Affairs. Honesty is important in any job, of course, but for the particular job Kavanaugh seeks, truth is utterly paramount and non-negotiable.

In saner times, the Canons of the Model Code of Judicial Conduct read like quaint truisms. For example, Canon 2A of the Model Code speaks in the mandatory language of “shall,” and requires that judges “shall respect and comply with the law” and “shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the fairness and impartiality of the judiciary.”

Opinion | Any law student can tell you why Kavanaugh's lying disqualifies him

How We Know Kavanaugh Is Lying | Current Affairs

I'd give you 10 stars if I could, thank you for all the work.
and this anonymous dude claiming it was him lie... is Grassley going to recommend him to the Judicial Branch for lying?

No, he is more concerned with the women who faked being Jane Doe. (if she is not made up or really a republican, LOL)
 
Last edited:
That guy who lied in the report insinuating it was him should of been investigated more thoroughly , he might assault women today, but no they just took his word for it. LIAR, that is what he is, to give Kav and out.

You are determined to believe that.
 
That guy who lied in the report insinuating it was him should of been investigated more thoroughly , he might assault women today, but no they just took his word for it. LIAR, that is what he is, to give Kav and out.

You are determined to believe that.
why not believe it, since it is the TRUTH....

Why isn't grassley recommending an investigation on him?

Why didn't Grassley bring him before the senate at the hearing to testify under oath? This would have given Kavanaugh a direct ''out'' of not being him....

SURELY the Senate Republicans would have brought him forward, IF THEY BELIEVED HIM.

CHECK MATE!

He was a scam artist, fake, phony, a liar.... there is no other logical explanation, Hadit.
 
Reality check: Spend some time in the courtroom and you will learn one conspicuous thing about liars: They are ALWAYS "100% certain" of their story. Of course they are! If they admitted to being uncertain, then there is no point in lying in the first place.

As an attorney cross-examining someone who is lying, you learn NEVER to ask, "Are you sure?" Because they always say they are sure. "I'd swear on a stack of Bibles!"

But for people remembering REAL EVENTS from 30 or 40 years ago THERE IS ALWAYS UNCERTAINTY.

I have been to numerous reunions with people from high school and a constant thing is people saying, "That was YOU?!!!' Because through the passage of time things become blurred, and your mind fills in gaps - sometimes erroneously.

Looking at the whole picture from the Kavanaugh hearings, it is obvious that Ford engaged in a planned, scripted, fabrication, from beginning to end. Even HER VOICE gave it away. That mousy little squeak was total bullshit. She is not some lowly file clerk who never speaks in public.

Now you are picking on her voice. You are right about one thing, a memory is dependent on the last memory of the subject, which is why the focus on the people involved in her terrible attack and the facts surrounding it will never leave her mind, it was traumatic enough to wipe most of the other memories of the day out.
...and the loopy kunt lied
 
That guy who lied in the report insinuating it was him should of been investigated more thoroughly , he might assault women today, but no they just took his word for it. LIAR, that is what he is, to give Kav and out.

You are determined to believe that.
why not believe it, since it is the TRUTH....

Why isn't grassley recommending an investigation on him?

Why didn't Grassley bring him before the senate at the hearing to testify under oath? This would have given Kavanaugh a direct ''out'' of not being him....

SURELY the Senate Republicans would have brought him forward, IF THEY BELIEVED HIM.

CHECK MATE!

He was a scam artist, fake, phony, a liar.... there is no other logical explanation, Hadit.

Or they simply didn't find what he had to say credible, nor did they need it. Remember, it's still about whether or not Kavanaugh assaulted Ford or not, and he didn't, so there's no need to bring him out, listen to him, or anything. They simply didn't need to give Kavanaugh an out because Ford's story was not believable.
 
kissed a girl he believes was Christine Blasey Ford

She was 100% certain her abuser was Kavanaugh. She also testified under oath, and this guy believe it was her and he is not coming forward?? Why, because he or Grassley made it up, that is why.

Sure doesn't change my mind.

She also testified under oath,


and?

So did Kavanaugh.

and he lied under oath.
Prove it. He'll take your claim all the way to the Supreme Court. LOL
 
Reality check: Spend some time in the courtroom and you will learn one conspicuous thing about liars: They are ALWAYS "100% certain" of their story. Of course they are! If they admitted to being uncertain, then there is no point in lying in the first place.

As an attorney cross-examining someone who is lying, you learn NEVER to ask, "Are you sure?" Because they always say they are sure. "I'd swear on a stack of Bibles!"

But for people remembering REAL EVENTS from 30 or 40 years ago THERE IS ALWAYS UNCERTAINTY.

I have been to numerous reunions with people from high school and a constant thing is people saying, "That was YOU?!!!' Because through the passage of time things become blurred, and your mind fills in gaps - sometimes erroneously.

Looking at the whole picture from the Kavanaugh hearings, it is obvious that Ford engaged in a planned, scripted, fabrication, from beginning to end. Even HER VOICE gave it away. That mousy little squeak was total bullshit. She is not some lowly file clerk who never speaks in public.

Now you are picking on her voice. You are right about one thing, a memory is dependent on the last memory of the subject, which is why the focus on the people involved in her terrible attack and the facts surrounding it will never leave her mind, it was traumatic enough to wipe most of the other memories of the day out.
How convenient !
 

Forum List

Back
Top