SCOTUS Strikes Down Unconstitutional Texas Abortion Law

Keep NaziCons out of vaginas!

8fd722a763e7c16d0c7c011019508051.jpg
You are looking in the wrong place. The fetus being killed is several inches above the vagina. No wonder you idiots are easily confused. You don't know the basics of anatomy.

This graphic created for dolts like you with the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker are deliberately designed to avert your eyes away from the fetus being murdered.

Democrats know where the front door is.
 
Keep NaziCons out of vaginas!

8fd722a763e7c16d0c7c011019508051.jpg
You are looking in the wrong place. The fetus being killed is several inches above the vagina. No wonder you idiots are easily confused. You don't know the basics of anatomy.

This graphic created for dolts like you with the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker are deliberately designed to avert your eyes away from the fetus being murdered.

Democrats know where the front door is.
Apparently you don't know much more than that.
 
Do democrats actually think that support for the baby killing abortion machine and making it easy for women to kill the unborn body inside them is an example of their concern for women's health? The biggest benefactor of abortion is liberal men who are absolved from their responsibilities at the stroke of a scalpel. It was a split vote but equally important was the unanimous vote that exonerated the former governor of Va..Gov. McDonald was a victim of the 3rd world Hussein administration's "justice dept" vendetta against republicans. McDonald accepted free meals and a couple of flights on private planes that amounted to less than 200k but the Clintons accepted millions while she was secretary/state in donations to the crooked foundation that her husband manages.

The Clinton Foundation is not "crooked". That's another Republican lie, one which they admit they cannot prove.

The Foundation has an exemplary record of working for women's health care, education and rights in Third World Countries. 80+% of their donations goes to the work of the Foundation.
 
Do democrats actually think that support for the baby killing abortion machine and making it easy for women to kill the unborn body inside them is an example of their concern for women's health? The biggest benefactor of abortion is liberal men who are absolved from their responsibilities at the stroke of a scalpel. It was a split vote but equally important was the unanimous vote that exonerated the former governor of Va..Gov. McDonald was a victim of the 3rd world Hussein administration's "justice dept" vendetta against republicans. McDonald accepted free meals and a couple of flights on private planes that amounted to less than 200k but the Clintons accepted millions while she was secretary/state in donations to the crooked foundation that her husband manages.

And Whitehall just demonstrates that this bill was always intended to be an end run around Roe v. Wade.
 
The law was directly intended to restrict access to abortion rather than further women's health. But regardless of how one feels about abortion (and I admit to being conflicted) Mississippi is one of the affected states, and our child welfare agency was nearly taken over by the Feds for failure to actually protect children in state custody, and is still hanging by a thread despite a state supreme court justice taking over the agency and the state pumping in millions.

In short, the states so adamant about "protecting fetuses" seem the least interest in protecting children.

Exactly the process the Supreme Court goes by. They decide if they agree with a law and the reasoning for it and if not, they fix it. Which is not their Constitutional role. They are lawless criminals in robes
Texas and other states were unable to show that abortions had any more complications that other out patient treatments allowed for other medical conditions. Three middle aged male catholics who admit they are pro life voted for Texas. But it wasn't legally or factually a difficult case.

Texas admitted that they couldn't find a single example of a woman these regulations would have helped:

He added that, "when directly asked at oral argument whether Texas knew of a single instance in which the new requirement would have helped even one woman obtain better treatment, Texas admitted that there was no evidence in the record of such a case."
 
The law was directly intended to restrict access to abortion rather than further women's health. But regardless of how one feels about abortion (and I admit to being conflicted) Mississippi is one of the affected states, and our child welfare agency was nearly taken over by the Feds for failure to actually protect children in state custody, and is still hanging by a thread despite a state supreme court justice taking over the agency and the state pumping in millions.

In short, the states so adamant about "protecting fetuses" seem the least interest in protecting children.

Exactly the process the Supreme Court goes by. They decide if they agree with a law and the reasoning for it and if not, they fix it. Which is not their Constitutional role. They are lawless criminals in robes
Texas and other states were unable to show that abortions had any more complications that other out patient treatments allowed for other medical conditions. Three middle aged male catholics who admit they are pro life voted for Texas. But it wasn't legally or factually a difficult case.
wonder why the bible bangers and statue humpers don't object to home birth
 
From the ruling:

The requirement's purpose is to help ensure that women have easy access to a hospital should complications arise during an abortion procedure, but the District Court, relying on evidence showing extremely low rates of serious complications before H.B.2's passage, found no significant health-related problem for the new law to cure. The State's record evidence, in contrast, does not show how the new law advanced the State's legitimate interest in protecting women's health when compared to the prior law, which required providers to have a "working arrangement" with doctors who had admitting privileges.

For that matter what's wrong with a back alley coat hanger as long as there's a "working arrangement" with the doctors who have admitting priveledges
 
The law was very obviously intended to make it harder to get an abortion and had nothing to do with protecting women's health. Even a blind mouse could see that.

It was a dick move. Pun intended.

How is going to a hospital making it harder? Are there no hospitals in TX?
 
Gee hypocritical how the Tea Maggots, and C@nt-servatives, rant and Bitch about BIG BROTHER GUBMINT, BLAH, BLAH. BLAH, but solicit the evil Gubmint to abolish Roe-Wade????? What the fuck is up with that??

I thought your Garbage party want Gubmint out of everyone's lives???

What happened to freedom?????, everyone, (including criminals)needs freedom to own some piece of shit assault rifle, but a Woman in your tiny lil minds doesn't have the right to choose what she does with her own body????
 
The law was very obviously intended to make it harder to get an abortion and had nothing to do with protecting women's health. Even a blind mouse could see that.

It was a dick move. Pun intended.

How is going to a hospital making it harder? Are there no hospitals in TX?
Frank, figure it out your own damn lazy ass self. Or stop being a failure of a troll. LOL
 
The law was very obviously intended to make it harder to get an abortion and had nothing to do with protecting women's health. Even a blind mouse could see that.

It was a dick move. Pun intended.

How is going to a hospital making it harder? Are there no hospitals in TX?
You are speaking on a matter with which you are clearly completely ignorant.
 
The law was very obviously intended to make it harder to get an abortion and had nothing to do with protecting women's health. Even a blind mouse could see that.

It was a dick move. Pun intended.

How is going to a hospital making it harder? Are there no hospitals in TX?
You are speaking on a matter with which you are clearly completely ignorant.
He's just trolling. He wants a rational explanation so he can troll that too.
 
Congratulations libs you can KILL more babies. I tell you what explain it to God and good luck with that.

I don't have to explain anything to God. I never had an abortion. That's what being "pro-choice" means. I chose to carry my pregnancies to term. If you believe abortion is wrong, you don't have to have one either. This is called "Freedom".

You are an abortion collaborator.
 

Forum List

Back
Top