Science is falsifiable

[fncceo]

The world's average temperature has been getting hotter unnaturally since the industrial revolution.

How was the global average temperature measured in the 18th Century?

Ever heard of ice cores?

Determining the temperature in Africa, or any other area largely unknown to 18th Century science, from ice cores taken from the poles is done by extrapolation, not measurement.

I asked how it is measured.

Sorry, you post nothing but nonsense in every thread you're in. See ya.

I accept your surrender.

 

[progressive hunter]

science is based on observation,,,and because of that ice cores are being interpreted incorrectly

if something was buried in ice 75 yrs ago how many ice rings should there be??

I can't argue science with the ignorant.

you cant debate because youre ignorant,,,

and also because you know I wont say something I cant back up with proof

You haven't backed up shit yet.

And btw, there's no such thing as "ice rings".

OK ice layers,,,just seeing if your awake

how many layers after 75 yrs??

I dunno, I don't pretend to have a science degree like you do.

hence you wont debate because youre ignorant,,,

at least youre honest about it,,,

and a reader of alinsky,,,if you cant refute the claim attack the messenger

 

[Pilot1]

The Climate has always changed naturally. It warms, it cools, sometimes drastically.

 

[Taz]

The world's average temperature has been getting hotter unnaturally since the industrial revolution.

How was the global average temperature measured in the 18th Century?

Ever heard of ice cores?

Determining the temperature in Africa, or any other area largely unknown to 18th Century science, from ice cores taken from the poles is done by extrapolation, not measurement.

I asked how it is measured.

Sorry, you post nothing but nonsense in every thread you're in. See ya.

I accept your surrender.

Btw, you're never funny. It's unanimous.

 

[Taz]

I can't argue science with the ignorant.

you cant debate because youre ignorant,,,

and also because you know I wont say something I cant back up with proof

You haven't backed up shit yet.

And btw, there's no such thing as "ice rings".

OK ice layers,,,just seeing if your awake

how many layers after 75 yrs??

I dunno, I don't pretend to have a science degree like you do.

hence you wont debate because youre ignorant,,,

at least youre honest about it,,,

and a reader of alinsky,,,if you cant refute the claim attack the messenger

It's too hard to argue with stupid, Mr Ice Rings.

 

[skookerasbil]

science is based on observation,,,and because of that ice cores are being interpreted incorrectly

if something was buried in ice 75 yrs ago how many ice rings should there be??

I can't argue science with the ignorant.

you cant debate because youre ignorant,,,

and also because you know I wont say something I cant back up with proof

You haven't backed up shit yet.

And btw, there's no such thing as "ice rings".

OK ice layers,,,just seeing if your awake

how many layers after 75 yrs??

I dunno, I don't pretend to have a science degree like you do.

s0n.....you're not getting it. The science isnt transcending anywhere beyond it's own field. Climate science is a hobby....its impacting zero in the real world. It's a big billboard for progressives on internet message boards but otherwise NOBODY is caring. The evidence of that is astounding.

When solar energy is providing more than 1.4% of our electrcity, come talk to us!

 

[fncceo]

How was the global average temperature measured in the 18th Century?

Ever heard of ice cores?

Determining the temperature in Africa, or any other area largely unknown to 18th Century science, from ice cores taken from the poles is done by extrapolation, not measurement.

I asked how it is measured.

Sorry, you post nothing but nonsense in every thread you're in. See ya.

I accept your surrender.

Btw, you're never funny. It's unanimous.

You've settled that science?

 

[Taz]

I can't argue science with the ignorant.

you cant debate because youre ignorant,,,

and also because you know I wont say something I cant back up with proof

You haven't backed up shit yet.

And btw, there's no such thing as "ice rings".

OK ice layers,,,just seeing if your awake

how many layers after 75 yrs??

I dunno, I don't pretend to have a science degree like you do.

s0n.....you're not getting it. The science isnt transcending anywhere beyond it's own field. Climate science is a hobby....its impacting zero in the real world. It's a big billboard for progressives on internet message boards but otherwise NOBODY is caring. The evidence of that is astounding.

When solar energy is providing more than 1.4% of our electrcity, come talk to us!

Wtf does solar energy has to do with climate change?

 

[fncceo]

you cant debate because youre ignorant,,,

and also because you know I wont say something I cant back up with proof

You haven't backed up shit yet.

And btw, there's no such thing as "ice rings".

OK ice layers,,,just seeing if your awake

how many layers after 75 yrs??

I dunno, I don't pretend to have a science degree like you do.

s0n.....you're not getting it. The science isnt transcending anywhere beyond it's own field. Climate science is a hobby....its impacting zero in the real world. It's a big billboard for progressives on internet message boards but otherwise NOBODY is caring. The evidence of that is astounding.

When solar energy is providing more than 1.4% of our electrcity, come talk to us!

Wtf does solar energy has to do with climate change?

Seriously? The sun doesn't affect climate?

 

[Taz]

Ever heard of ice cores?

Determining the temperature in Africa, or any other area largely unknown to 18th Century science, from ice cores taken from the poles is done by extrapolation, not measurement.

I asked how it is measured.

Sorry, you post nothing but nonsense in every thread you're in. See ya.

I accept your surrender.

Btw, you're never funny. It's unanimous.

You've settled that science?

Thanks for proving my point.

 

[Taz]

You haven't backed up shit yet.

And btw, there's no such thing as "ice rings".

OK ice layers,,,just seeing if your awake

how many layers after 75 yrs??

I dunno, I don't pretend to have a science degree like you do.

s0n.....you're not getting it. The science isnt transcending anywhere beyond it's own field. Climate science is a hobby....its impacting zero in the real world. It's a big billboard for progressives on internet message boards but otherwise NOBODY is caring. The evidence of that is astounding.

When solar energy is providing more than 1.4% of our electrcity, come talk to us!

Wtf does solar energy has to do with climate change?

Seriously? The sun doesn't affect climate?

It's the attack of the numbskulls. HELP!!!

 

[westwall]

The world's average temperature has been getting hotter unnaturally since the industrial revolution.

No, it hasn't. Amazingly enough, the industrial revolution coincided with the recovery from the Little Ice Age.

That's called historical fact.

You should study some.


Sent from my SM-G892A using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[westwall]

masters

In what? Denying science?

science is based on observation,,,and because of that ice cores are being interpreted incorrectly

if something was buried in ice 75 yrs ago how many ice rings should there be??

I can't argue science with the ignorant.

you cant debate because youre ignorant,,,

and also because you know I wont say something I cant back up with proof

You haven't backed up shit yet.

And btw, there's no such thing as "ice rings". [emoji38]

You are only partially correct.

There are however layers, that are measured just like tree rings. He used the term out of deference to your ignorance.

Sent from my SM-G892A using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[westwall]

you cant debate because youre ignorant,,,

and also because you know I wont say something I cant back up with proof

You haven't backed up shit yet.

And btw, there's no such thing as "ice rings". [emoji38]

OK ice layers,,,just seeing if your awake

how many layers after 75 yrs??

I dunno, I don't pretend to have a science degree like you do.

s0n.....you're not getting it. The science isnt transcending anywhere beyond it's own field. Climate science is a hobby....its impacting zero in the real world. It's a big billboard for progressives on internet message boards but otherwise NOBODY is caring. The evidence of that is astounding.

When solar energy is providing more than 1.4% of our electrcity, come talk to us!

Wtf does solar energy has to do with climate change?

EVERYTHING YOU MORON! What do you think drives the climate engine of the world!

Talk about an ignorant fool!

Sent from my SM-G892A using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[Crepitus]

What a clever change in propaganda when they directed their sheep is stop global warming chants to something far more ambiguous which would of course include any and all events in weather.

From droughts to floods. Feom less snowfall to more snowfall. From more hurricanes, to less hurricanes.

Deliberately far more ambiguous term.

 

[Taz]

You haven't backed up shit yet.

And btw, there's no such thing as "ice rings". [emoji38]

OK ice layers,,,just seeing if your awake

how many layers after 75 yrs??

I dunno, I don't pretend to have a science degree like you do.

s0n.....you're not getting it. The science isnt transcending anywhere beyond it's own field. Climate science is a hobby....its impacting zero in the real world. It's a big billboard for progressives on internet message boards but otherwise NOBODY is caring. The evidence of that is astounding.

When solar energy is providing more than 1.4% of our electrcity, come talk to us!

Wtf does solar energy has to do with climate change?

EVERYTHING YOU MORON! What do you think drives the climate engine of the world!

Talk about an ignorant fool!

Sent from my SM-G892A using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Solar power drives climate? Gawd you’re dumb.

 

[Theowl32]

The world's average temperature has been getting hotter unnaturally since the industrial revolution.

Oh, so it is global warming still? Better let them know.

Btw you loser, want to now tell all of climate experts that their shouts about global cooling in the 70s after the first Earth Day were all wrong?

No? That is what we thought you loser.

Let ask you this loser, are you suggesting that we should go back to the stone age?

What science degrees do Leonardo DiCaprio and Al Gore have you hypocritical loser?

Hey, why do you still ignore the 31,000 scientists that did not support man made global warming?

Wait, what is it with you? Climate change? Man made global warming?

Loser

 

[skookerasbil]

Anybody who contends that CO2 is the only driver of climate change.....I mean, what can you say? These are people who take zombie to a whole new level.....would buy a bag of dog doo for $5,000 a pop if it was packaged up just right!

 

[Crick]

Hello Owl. I see very little has changed with you.

The world's average temperature has been getting hotter unnaturally since the industrial revolution.

Oh, so it is global warming still? Better let them know.

Btw you loser, want to now tell all of climate experts that their shouts about global cooling in the 70s after the first Earth Day were all wrong?

No, because virtually no climate experts were shouting about global cooling the 70s.

No? That is what we thought you loser.

And this is the sort of ignorant polemical rhetoric I would expect from you.

Let ask you this loser, are you suggesting that we should go back to the stone age?

I'm pretty certain he was not. So, why do you want to mischaracterize his views like that? Why aren't you arguing with what he actually said?

What science degrees do Leonardo DiCaprio and Al Gore have you hypocritical loser?

What science degree do you possess Mr Owl? The last I heard you had a business degree. And did Taz use Mr DiCaprio or Mr Gore as science references? I bet he did not. Once again, you are making things up to argue against - things that your debating opponent here never said. There's a clever name for that but I think we can use "bullshit".

Hey, why do you still ignore the 31,000 scientists that did not support man made global warming?

Because virtually NONE of them were actually scientists.

Wait, what is it with you? Climate change? Man made global warming?

Loser

This is about the most pathetic excuse for an argument I have ever seen.

The planet is getting warmer. In decades of study, the only causes found for that warming have been increasing emissions of GHGs and deforestation. The results of that warming will be costly in the extreme; in terms of both money and lives. These are the conclusions of very close to 100% of the studies conducted over the last two decades on these topics.

 

[Crick]

Manners, manners young strigiform.

It is an old argument that AGW is not falsifiable. Let me put up a few things that might undo it:

1) Show that CO2 does not act as a greenhouse gas
2) Show that CO2 levels are not increasing
3) Show that the increased CO2 in the atmosphere is not of human origin
4) Repeat 1-3 concerning methane
5) Show that humans are not responsible for deforestation
6) Show that deforestation has had no effect on CO2 levels in the atmosphere
7) Show that the planet is not warming
8) Show that something other than the greenhouse effect is responsible for the observed warming
9) Show that the planet will soon cease to warm and begin cooling off
10) Show that all the world's climate scientists are involved in a massive conspiracy to falsify all the evidence supporting AGW
11) Show that warming threatens no harm whatsoever
12) Show that warming will be a net benefit to humankind.

Let me know if you need more.