Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The decision that Bush was right WAS 7 - 2. The only revision is claiming otherwise, the only 5- 4 was on how to handle the recount after the decision was made it was currently being handled wrongly.
Geeze do you guys lie much or what?
The decision that Bush was right WAS 7 - 2. The only revision is claiming otherwise, the only 5- 4 was on how to handle the recount after the decision was made it was currently being handled wrongly.
Geeze do you guys lie much or what?
It was reported in 2000 as 5 to 4, and that is how has been, is, and will be taught in high school and college classes.
I will send your comment to several of my teacher and instructor friends for how the reactionary right tries to rewrite history
Folks like you are continuing to do your best to minimize the Republican Party.
The decision that Bush was right WAS 7 - 2. The only revision is claiming otherwise, the only 5- 4 was on how to handle the recount after the decision was made it was currently being handled wrongly.
Geeze do you guys lie much or what?
It was reported in 2000 as 5 to 4, and that is how has been, is, and will be taught in high school and college classes.
I will send your comment to several of my teacher and instructor friends for how the reactionary right tries to rewrite history
Folks like you are continuing to do your best to minimize the Republican Party.
Fake Starkey never bothered to read the 7-2 decision
It was reported in 2000 as 5 to 4, and that is how has been, is, and will be taught in high school and college classes.
I will send your comment to several of my teacher and instructor friends for how the reactionary right tries to rewrite history
Folks like you are continuing to do your best to minimize the Republican Party.
Fake Starkey never bothered to read the 7-2 decision
Like most liberals, he believes only what he wants to believe, the truth be damned.
By Ian Millhiser
During a speech at Wesleyan University last night, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia offered a strange revision of the time he joined with four of his conservative colleagues to make George W. Bush president:
At the end of the speech, Scalia took questions from the audience. One person asked about the Bush-Gore case, where the Supreme Court had to determine the winner of the election.
Get over it, Scalia said of the controversy surrounding it, to laughter from the audience.
Scalia reminded the audience it was Gore who took the election to court, and the election was going to be decided in a court anywayeither the Florida Supreme Court or the U.S. Supreme Court.
It was a long time ago, people forget It was a 7-2 decision. It wasnt even close, he said.
Bush v. Gore was not a 7-2 decision and indeed, Scalia could tell this is true by counting all four of the dissenting opinions in that case. Although it is true that the four dissenters divided on how the Florida recount should proceed two believed there should be a statewide recount of all Florida voters while two others believed a narrower recount would be acceptable not one of the Courts four moderates agreed with Scalia that the winner of the 2000 presidential election should effectively be chosen by five most conservative members of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Scalia Rewrites History, Claims 5-4 Bush v. Gore Decision 'Wasn't Even Close'
Scalia Lies About Bush V. Gore Tells Crowd To Get Over It | Addicting Info
Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia speaks at Wesleyan - The Middletown Press : Serving Middletown, CT
Gore Won Florida
Lots of rewriting going on at the GOP.
So what if Soros called Gore - but do you have any "credible" proof that he did?
Who cares? the Supreme Court became involved because the Florida Supreme Court by a 5 to 2 decision violated Federal law on the recounts.
The Supreme Court Ruled 7 to 2... I REPEAT 7 to 2. That the recount must stop and that the ruling the Florida Supreme Court made was wrong. By this time it was to late to let the Florida Courts make a corrected ruling and the illegal recount was stopped by a 5-4 decision.
Pure bullshit.
Gore Won Florida
Florida 'recounts' make Gore winner | World news | The Guardian
It was reported in 2000 as 5 to 4, and that is how has been, is, and will be taught in high school and college classes.
I will send your comment to several of my teacher and instructor friends for how the reactionary right tries to rewrite history
Folks like you are continuing to do your best to minimize the Republican Party.
Fake Starkey never bothered to read the 7-2 decision
Like most liberals, he believes only what he wants to believe, the truth be damned.
By Ian Millhiser
During a speech at Wesleyan University last night, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia offered a strange revision of the time he joined with four of his conservative colleagues to make George W. Bush president:
At the end of the speech, Scalia took questions from the audience. One person asked about the Bush-Gore case, where the Supreme Court had to determine the winner of the election.
Get over it, Scalia said of the controversy surrounding it, to laughter from the audience.
Scalia reminded the audience it was Gore who took the election to court, and the election was going to be decided in a court anywayeither the Florida Supreme Court or the U.S. Supreme Court.
It was a long time ago, people forget It was a 7-2 decision. It wasnt even close, he said.
Bush v. Gore was not a 7-2 decision and indeed, Scalia could tell this is true by counting all four of the dissenting opinions in that case. Although it is true that the four dissenters divided on how the Florida recount should proceed two believed there should be a statewide recount of all Florida voters while two others believed a narrower recount would be acceptable not one of the Courts four moderates agreed with Scalia that the winner of the 2000 presidential election should effectively be chosen by five most conservative members of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Scalia Rewrites History, Claims 5-4 Bush v. Gore Decision 'Wasn't Even Close'
Scalia Lies About Bush V. Gore Tells Crowd To Get Over It | Addicting Info
Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia speaks at Wesleyan - The Middletown Press : Serving Middletown, CT
Gore Won Florida
By Ian Millhiser
During a speech at Wesleyan University last night, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia offered a strange revision of the time he joined with four of his conservative colleagues to make George W. Bush president:
At the end of the speech, Scalia took questions from the audience. One person asked about the Bush-Gore case, where the Supreme Court had to determine the winner of the election.Bush v. Gore was not a 7-2 decision and indeed, Scalia could tell this is true by counting all four of the dissenting opinions in that case. Although it is true that the four dissenters divided on how the Florida recount should proceed two believed there should be a statewide recount of all Florida voters while two others believed a narrower recount would be acceptable not one of the Courts four moderates agreed with Scalia that the winner of the 2000 presidential election should effectively be chosen by five most conservative members of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Get over it, Scalia said of the controversy surrounding it, to laughter from the audience.
Scalia reminded the audience it was Gore who took the election to court, and the election was going to be decided in a court anywayeither the Florida Supreme Court or the U.S. Supreme Court.
It was a long time ago, people forget It was a 7-2 decision. It wasnt even close, he said.
Scalia Rewrites History, Claims 5-4 Bush v. Gore Decision 'Wasn't Even Close'
Scalia Lies About Bush V. Gore Tells Crowd To Get Over It | Addicting Info
Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia speaks at Wesleyan - The Middletown Press : Serving Middletown, CT
Gore Won Florida
The decision that Bush was right WAS 7 - 2. The only revision is claiming otherwise, the only 5- 4 was on how to handle the recount after the decision was made it was currently being handled wrongly.
Geeze do you guys lie much or what?
It was reported in 2000 as 5 to 4, and that is how has been, is, and will be taught in high school and college classes.
I will send your comment to several of my teacher and instructor friends for how the reactionary right tries to rewrite history
Folks like you are continuing to do your best to minimize the Republican Party.
Once the 7-2 EP decision came down, there was no legal or constitutional means to continue the recount, as every possible remedy would run afoul of one, the other, or both.The decision that Bush was right WAS 7 - 2. The only revision is claiming otherwise, the only 5- 4 was on how to handle the recount after the decision was made it was currently being handled wrongly.
Geeze do you guys lie much or what?
It was reported in 2000 as 5 to 4, and that is how has been, is, and will be taught in high school and college classes.
I will send your comment to several of my teacher and instructor friends for how the reactionary right tries to rewrite history
Folks like you are continuing to do your best to minimize the Republican Party.
It was 7-2 Jake, stop drinking Democrat KoolAid
