- Aug 27, 2008
- 18,450
- 1,823
- 205
Except again this was decided by Judges. Judges are not supposed to be making LAWS.
This is true, which is why I think DiveCon's solution is the way to go.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Except again this was decided by Judges. Judges are not supposed to be making LAWS.
This is true, which is why I think DiveCon's solution is the way to go.
The majority of gays suffered from some form of child abuse. It's quite sad. Let's hope these people get the treatment they need.
I agree on a religious front. However, in the US, marriage is also a legal contract. Are we to tell a peson, because of his sexual orientation, that he or she may not enter into a legal contract with another person?
There you go, CW.
Injecting that annoying voice of logic and reason into a debate designed to evoke irrational emotionalism.
Spoilsport.
There is no reason gays can not get the same legal contractual rights. AT present they just have to fill out more forms.
And I answered it with medical studies. I don't care what your sexual orientation is, but you should at least be open-minded enough to look at the evidence.
Yep, if it's marriage.
There are other ways of doing contracts.
Good for them. Liberty for all, not just heterosexuals.
Liberty, justice and equal treatment under the law is all well and fine.. it does not, however, give them the right to redefine what a marriage is and has always been.... civil union ceremonies? All well and fine... but unless it is truly a man and a woman, it cannot be marriage
Didn't homo marriage just get stopped in California???The notion that somehow gay marriage can be stopped is unlearned.
It most certainly can and WILL be deemed marriage.
The notion that somehow gay marriage can be stopped is unlearned.
Gays aren't going anywhere and as their social and political power continues to grow, so will their ability to demand marriage.
.. just a matter of time .. a short time.
the solution to this issue is for the government to get out of the marriage business completely and have nothing to do with it, there should be no legal issues involved with marriage
it is a religious ceremony and as such is protected by the first amendment
the only thing the government should be part of is the legalities and they should call them all civil unions for everyone
that being said, you would still have the issue of some churches that already do perform same sex marriages
There is no reason gays can not get the same legal contractual rights. AT present they just have to fill out more forms.
This from a guy with a "snorkel" in his mouth.
That was a joke nothing personal. It was too easy to pass up.
BTW I completely agree with you. There is absolutely no reason why contributing, productive, participants in society should not be able to partake in the benefits and privileges granted by society.
In other words, who cares if two people who care about each other enter into a legally recognized union?
Call it marriage, call it a civil contract, who cares? In fact the states should stop recognizing church marriages and require a civil service for all marriages or unions to be legally recognized.
That's funny comming from a Zionist Jew who defends building a wall in Israel to keep the Palestenian people seperate!!!!Separate but equal is never equal.
Separate but equal is never equal.
Just as a person who is of Caucasian race cannot simply seek to redefine what African American is to be deemed 'black' by the law.... just as you cannot deem your dog to be a cat... it is not right to redefine marriage which always has been defined as the union between a man and a woman.... as stated.. I am all for their equal treatment under the law as a couple/family... but it simply is not marriage... and it is not their right to redefine marriage
Then I guess men and women cannot be deemed equal... Hispanics not equal to Asians, not equal to Eskimos, not equal to Whites, not equal to Blacks?
The key is we have things that make us separate... there are labels everywhere in government... does not mean they cannot be deemed equal and treated equal under the law..
Have the government recognize all things as unions for all I care... for in fact a marriage is a union recognized by the law... but also in fact marriage or matrimony is indeed defined as a union between a man and a woman... if the government recognizes other family unions as being equal to marriage in rights (inheritance, med decisions, power of attorney, etc) that should be good..
But as I have sated before.. that is not the objective... pushing the gay agenda is the objective... not just equal rights under the law
they do. that's where the line, "by the power vested in me" comes from. priests, ministers, JPs, rabbis are all acting partially as agents of the state when they perform a wedding ceremony.