Rules regarding accusations of paedophilia

[Dogmaphobe]

One question I would toss out there is to ask how many children did Delta ruin during the time he was being protected here?

The protection was intentional. Everybody knew he was a pedo. If there were children molested during that period, some of the responsibility rests on ALL those who run this site.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

The rule specifically says no calling members pedophiles, when the subject is brought up most people associate grooming with pedophilia. Based on the fact that most people are simple minded fools who don't see or understand nuance gives the perception that accusing someone of supporting grooming can be seen as ostensibly the same thing hence a violation.
Remember, K.I.S.S........ Especially where Tommy is concerned...........

Prior to the past couple years - that is the definition of grooming. A single adult grooming a single child.
Again to show how fucked up things are getting- no one would have predicted that we would have a situation where whole groups of adults, much more organized groups of adults wholesale speaking to children to entice them into expressing themselves sexually in ways they have absolutely no understanding of.
There is no term for that, because it is such a fucked up situation, no one ever put a word to it. So people have started calling it "grooming". For lack of another term.
And because of that, mods have to be careful not to infract someone for using the term in how people are applying it now.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

My problem.
The term "grooming" is expanding, and being used to describe a number of actions where adults are injecting sexualized material to VERY young children in order to influence them into thinking how they want them to think.
There is no term for that, because other than whacked out isolated religious fanatics, there has been no such thing as what we are seeing happening today.
So when someone calls someone a "groomer" or is supportive of grooming, and they are using the term in how it is widespread being used... that is not calling them a pedo.
In my opinion, you need to stipulate between the two uses of the word.

 

[Missourian]

I've never known anyone to get hurt by a word, in fact, growing up, I was taught:

"Sticks and Stones may break my bones but NAMES will never hurt me!"

The me generation created by the progressive left sure has turned out a bunch of WEENIES.

Honestly I seriously doubt Tommy Taint...a made up username of an anonymous person on the internet...gives a damn if a different made up username of another anonymous person on the internet calls him a pedo on a messageboard...I'm sure what really has his panties in a bunch is that calling those opposed ti the Florida anti-grooming law groomers is a tactic that is working.

Therefore...in the manner of the left...his first reaction is to find a way to reverse the losses...and at the top of the list of how to accomplish that is...use the terms-of-service to your advantage.

Bet it's working on Twitter.

 

[Missourian]

Really?

Just because SOME Disney employees have records, doesn't make ALL of Disney child predators.

Just because a miniscule minority of those on the right are Nazis doesn't make ALL people on the Right Nazis.

Does that stop the left from calling everyone on the right Nazis?

(You could easily reverse that with socialists, Marxist, communists)...

 

[Leo123]

I find that to be a ridiculous argument. All groomers are paedos. That is why they are grooming. And that is why the word grooming is being used by these idiots..

All you are doing is giving people a get out from their accusations. You show yourself to be hopelessly ou of touch Will.

Perhaps you could explain where I rank on your LGBT scale when I am being accused of grooming. I am a married man and a father of 3.
I am not trans or any other variation. So when I am called a groomer the obvious assumption is that I am being accused of being a paedo.
There is no other interpretation.

Approval or condoning teaching young children that they might 'feel' like they are the opposite sex is being supportive of grooming. IMO

 

[MisterBeale]

Really?

Just because SOME Disney employees have records, doesn't make ALL of Disney child predators.

Only folks that love the Disney brand and the Disney name can gaslight themselves into believing it is, "just," the employees.

REVEALED: Disney Was Sending Kids To Epstein’s ‘Pedophile Island’ For 'Snorkeling Trips'

For years, a Disney-owned and operated Caribbean cruise line was operating a 'snorkeling tour' for kids to Jeffrey Epstein's renowned "Pedophile Island." For k

en-volve.com

Jeffrey Epstein island: What really happened there?

Accusers say billionaire’s private paradise of Little St James in US Virgin Islands was centre of international sex trafficking ring

www.independent.co.uk

 

[Oddball]

Almost as bad as the rule demanding threads be moved to the basement for misspelling Obumma's name wrong while there are ten OPs a day calling DJT "tRUMP" and Tramp.

And certainly as bad as the rule that leaves every RUSSIA! hoax thread right where it is dumped, while any and every thread having so much as a whiff of questioning of the '20 election results promptly gets whisked off to the dungeon.

 

[MisterBeale]

I would be insulted if I were Italian or Sicilian!

That was hilarious. . . so glad you quoted that for posterity before it got the axe!

 

[toobfreak]

Does that stop the left from calling everyone on the right Nazis?

No, because places like USMB never write a rule preventing it. But we have "off-limit" words galore to protect the delicate pantywaists on the Left.

It's the old double standard.

Seems the Left need lots and lots of protection on social media, special election rules favoring them, massive media lies and censorship throughout social media for a democrat to win anymore.

 

[miketx]

That was hilarious. . . so glad you quoted that for posterity before it got the axe!

Guess you can't joke among friends either. I know, I'll admit to being a pedophile and I'm in!

 

[Dogmaphobe]

And certainly as bad as the rule that laves every RUSSIA! hoax thread right where it is dumped, while any and every thread having so much as a whiff of questioning of the '20 election results promptly gets whisked off to the dungeon.

What gets me is that we have all these moderators who are quite moderate and reasonable posters, yet an extremist controls the discussion here, and when that extremist says "jump", all the others say is "how high?".

 

[Devils_Advocate]

That was hilarious. . . so glad you quoted that for posterity before it got the axe!

Wow, truthfully I am just speechless…

Guess you can't joke among friends either. I know, I'll admit to being a pedophile and I'm in!

It wasn’t me and I even joked about being Russian…

Wow, just wow…

I do understand this is Zone one but just wow…

Alright, let get to the hardcore reality and no adult should be talking sexual education with a minor that is not approved by the parent and I will go further the parent should have the right to monitor the class to make sure what is being taught is what they authorized!

Just my opinion, but again wow!

 

[Oddball]

What gets me is that we have all these moderators who are quite moderate and reasonable posters, yet an extremist controls the discussion here, and when that extremist says "jump", all the others say is "how high?".

This is what affirmative action gets you.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Guess you can't joke among friends either. I know, I'll admit to being a pedophile and I'm in!

If, in addition to that, if you would add that you want to go burn down a business and that Jihad is about the very best thing since bread came sliced, you would be downright untouchable.

 

[westwall]

One question I would toss out there is to ask how many children did Delta ruin during the time he was being protected here?

The protection was intentional. Everybody knew he was a pedo. If there were children molested during that period, some of the responsibility rests on ALL those who run this site.

Yup. One of the reasons I quit being a Mod.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Yup. One of the reasons I quit being a Mod.

Unfortunately, the same status quo is still being enforced.

 

[westwall]

Unfortunately, the same status quo is still being enforced.

I know. I just refused to be a part.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I know. I just refused to be a part.

Thank goodness being a mod here doesn't require selling your soul to the devil even if you are required to lease it out for the duration.

 

[Hossfly]

I find that to be a ridiculous argument. All groomers are paedos. That is why they are grooming. And that is why the word grooming is being used by these idiots..

All you are doing is giving people a get out from their accusations. You show yourself to be hopelessly ou of touch Will.

Perhaps you could explain where I rank on your LGBT scale when I am being accused of grooming. I am a married man and a father of 3.
I am not trans or any other variation. So when I am called a groomer the obvious assumption is that I am being accused of being a paedo.
There is no other interpretation.

I groomed my dog today. I especially made sure he didn't have any deer ticks on his nut sack. He scratches and turns in circles when he has some. Didn't find any.

Deer Tick