Ron Paul: Obama Presidency On The Verge Of Being A "Dictatorship"

[ogibillm]

Based on the CONTENT of those EO's - Obama. Reagan didn't use Executive Orders to thwart the US Constitution, Obama does.

i believe the phrase is "put up or shut up"

 

[Uncensored2008]

Do you have some analyses to back that up, or is it little more than your usual rhetorical flourish?

{President Barack Obama unveiled a stopgap plan Monday to ease the bite of the real estate crisis for cash-strapped homeowners while attacking Congress for blocking spending to create more jobs.

"These steps aren't a substitute for the bold action we need to create jobs and grow the economy, but they will make a difference," Obama said.

Thwarted by Republican opposition to his bigger jobs and stimulus package, Obama has shifted tactics by looking for action he can take without congressional approval to provide at least modest economic relief.

"So I'm here to say to all of you... that we can't wait for an increasingly dysfunctional Congress to do its job. Where they won't act, I will," Obama said.}

Obama openly violated the US Constitution and assumed dictatorial powers.

 

[Mustang]

Do you have some analyses to back that up, or is it little more than your usual rhetorical flourish?

{President Barack Obama unveiled a stopgap plan Monday to ease the bite of the real estate crisis for cash-strapped homeowners while attacking Congress for blocking spending to create more jobs.

"These steps aren't a substitute for the bold action we need to create jobs and grow the economy, but they will make a difference," Obama said.

Thwarted by Republican opposition to his bigger jobs and stimulus package, Obama has shifted tactics by looking for action he can take without congressional approval to provide at least modest economic relief.

"So I'm here to say to all of you... that we can't wait for an increasingly dysfunctional Congress to do its job. Where they won't act, I will," Obama said.}

Obama openly violated the US Constitution and assumed dictatorial powers.

I guess the answer is no.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I guess the answer is no.

I guess you're illiterate.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Do you have some analyses to back that up, or is it little more than your usual rhetorical flourish?

{President Barack Obama unveiled a stopgap plan Monday to ease the bite of the real estate crisis for cash-strapped homeowners while attacking Congress for blocking spending to create more jobs.

"These steps aren't a substitute for the bold action we need to create jobs and grow the economy, but they will make a difference," Obama said.

Thwarted by Republican opposition to his bigger jobs and stimulus package, Obama has shifted tactics by looking for action he can take without congressional approval to provide at least modest economic relief.

"So I'm here to say to all of you... that we can't wait for an increasingly dysfunctional Congress to do its job. Where they won't act, I will," Obama said.}

Obama openly violated the US Constitution and assumed dictatorial powers.

Not only that but he has been taunting the House while claiming he will veto any republican bill that passes the Senate..

Obama is a fucking asshole and a dictator...

Then he tries to play victim when he doesn't get what he wants..

This is the same prick that told republicans to "get in the back seat" while his ship was sinking..

He will easily go down as one of the worst, stubborn and arrogant presidents in American history..

One more year and this stupid fuck will be out of office...

 

[J.E.D]

Idiot - that was a progressive super majority (which Obama was a member of) that passed that bill... Let's also not forget that Obama has been playing grab-ass with GE for the last 3 years..

Just remember ignorant one - congress passes legislation and spending NOT the president - the president signs the passed legislation making that legislation law or authorized.

One of Bush's problems was that he respected democracy too much - he only had 12 vetos in 8 years and 1/3rd of them were overridden by the progressive super majority...

Also, I love how you just skip over my other assertions because you have no answer for them.

Right. And Bushed signed it into law. He didn't veto it. Face it, I owned you. You're just too dishonest to admit it. I skipped over the rest of your post because, much like the part that I focused on, it was all nonsensical gibberish.

And if Bush vetoed more you would call him a dictator..

Once again progressives want to have their cake and eat it...

Bush could either respect democracy or veto it - he chose respect democracy and that is his fault??

You retarded progressives legislated bullshit on your own - now your ideas blow up in your face and its Bush's fault??

You're fucking retarded..

This is just like Iraq and the progressives time and time again voted to fund the war(s) then they turn around and blame republicans...

Progressives are all ignorant, delusional and liars... That is a fucking fact and this thread and your posts add credence to that fact...

I guess I touched a nerve. Can you say meltdown? I'm not criticizing Bush - you are criticizing Obama for legislation that Bush signed into law. I actually support the law; so I appreciate Bush signing it into law. I owned you big time. You are a failure of your own making. You. Are. A. Moron.

 

[J.E.D]

What the hell is emotional about the US Constitution.??. I provided it to you, word for word.. it's not my problem that you're a fucking moron hellbent on believing whatever the fuck your twisted mind comes up with.

You didn't prove shit. You posted a passage from the Constitution that you thought proved your point. It didn't. Congress gave president's the power to issue EO's - which means that per the passage you cited, EO's are Constitutional. Are you another one who thinks that every president in the history of the US violated the Constitution with their EO's?

Here. Educate yourself:

ThisNation.com--What is an Executive Order?

Executive Orders (EOs) are legally binding orders given by the President, acting as the head of the Executive Branch, to Federal Administrative Agencies. Executive Orders are generally used to direct federal agencies and officials in their execution of congressionally established laws or policies. However, in many instances they have been used to guide agencies in directions contrary to congressional intent.

Not all EOs are created equal. Proclamations, for example, are a special type of Executive Order that are generally ceremonial or symbolic, such as when the President declares National Take Your Child To Work Day. Another subset of Executive Orders are those concerned with national security or defense issues. These have generally been known as National Security Directives. Under the Clinton Administration, they have been termed "Presidential Decision Directives."

Executive Orders do not require Congressional approval to take effect but they have the same legal weight as laws passed by Congress. The President's source of authority to issue Executive Orders can be found in the Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution which grants to the President the "executive Power." Section 3 of Article II further directs the President to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." To implement or execute the laws of the land, Presidents give direction and guidance to Executive Branch agencies and departments, often in the form of Executive Orders.

You're truly one of the dumber posters here.. The Constitution stands on it's own merit.. those words don't run nor do they change.. IT'S CONCISE and lays out what our Founders intended in regard to how Government should function within the confines of a Republic.. so do us all a favor and take your ignorant talking points and shove them straight up your ass.

So, you still can't refute what I posted, and now you've resorted to name-calling. That's grand coming from a half-wit like yourself. You are the same dumbass who started a thread about one of Cain's accusers supposedly working for the Obama administration. Not only were you wrong, but the lady is in fact a REGISTERED REPUBLICAN. I think I'll take whatever you claim to know about the Constitution with a fucking ocean of salt.

 

[rdean]

Ron Paul apparently has a warning for America.

Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) says President Obama's continued use of the executive order "brings the modern presidency dangerously close to an elective dictatorship."

"That is arrogant," Paul said of Obama frequently using the executive order function as of late. "It is flaunting the Constitution and the whole principle of how we’re supposed to operate. The idea they can just do this and take over the legislative function and brag about it -- and Congress does nothing and the courts do nothing about it, it's very, very bad."

"He's dictatorial, is what he is," Rep. Paul said before the end of the interview.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/09/ron_paul_obama_presidency
_on_the_verge_of_being_a_dictatorship.html

Really? What's the number of EOs that Obama has signed in a little less than 3 years? The answer is 100.

In 8 years in office, Reagan signed 381 Executive Orders.

Based on the numbers, who better qualifies as a dictator?

You can check the numbers at the link below.


Barack Obama Executive Orders Disposition Tables

Democrats didn't hate Reagan more then they loved the United States.

 

[Mustang]

Ron Paul apparently has a warning for America.

Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) says President Obama's continued use of the executive order "brings the modern presidency dangerously close to an elective dictatorship."

"That is arrogant," Paul said of Obama frequently using the executive order function as of late. "It is flaunting the Constitution and the whole principle of how we’re supposed to operate. The idea they can just do this and take over the legislative function and brag about it -- and Congress does nothing and the courts do nothing about it, it's very, very bad."

"He's dictatorial, is what he is," Rep. Paul said before the end of the interview.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/09/ron_paul_obama_presidency
_on_the_verge_of_being_a_dictatorship.html

Really? What's the number of EOs that Obama has signed in a little less than 3 years? The answer is 100.

In 8 years in office, Reagan signed 381 Executive Orders.

Based on the numbers, who better qualifies as a dictator?

You can check the numbers at the link below.


Barack Obama Executive Orders Disposition Tables

Democrats didn't hate Reagan more then they loved the United States.

Democrats also didn't refuse to work with Reagan.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

You didn't prove shit. You posted a passage from the Constitution that you thought proved your point. It didn't. Congress gave president's the power to issue EO's - which means that per the passage you cited, EO's are Constitutional. Are you another one who thinks that every president in the history of the US violated the Constitution with their EO's?

Here. Educate yourself:

You're truly one of the dumber posters here.. The Constitution stands on it's own merit.. those words don't run nor do they change.. IT'S CONCISE and lays out what our Founders intended in regard to how Government should function within the confines of a Republic.. so do us all a favor and take your ignorant talking points and shove them straight up your ass.

So, you still can't refute what I posted, and now you've resorted to name-calling. That's grand coming from a half-wit like yourself. You are the same dumbass who started a thread about one of Cain's accusers supposedly working for the Obama administration. Not only were you wrong, but the lady is in fact a REGISTERED REPUBLICAN. I think I'll take whatever you claim to know about the Constitution with a fucking ocean of salt.

ROFLMAO You whine like a pantied bitchboy regarding being called names and do that very thing a sentence later.. OMG, bend over and say AHHHHHHHHH

 

[Mustang]

I guess the answer is no.

I guess you're illiterate.

Since I'm reading and responding to what you're typing (as nonsensical as it may be), you're obviously wrong...yet again.

 

[J.E.D]

You're truly one of the dumber posters here.. The Constitution stands on it's own merit.. those words don't run nor do they change.. IT'S CONCISE and lays out what our Founders intended in regard to how Government should function within the confines of a Republic.. so do us all a favor and take your ignorant talking points and shove them straight up your ass.

So, you still can't refute what I posted, and now you've resorted to name-calling. That's grand coming from a half-wit like yourself. You are the same dumbass who started a thread about one of Cain's accusers supposedly working for the Obama administration. Not only were you wrong, but the lady is in fact a REGISTERED REPUBLICAN. I think I'll take whatever you claim to know about the Constitution with a fucking ocean of salt.

ROFLMAO You whine like a pantied bitchboy regarding being called names and do that very thing a sentence later..

I'm not whining. I'm simply stating that because you can't refute my posts, you resort to name-calling. I have no problem with insults, but some substance would be nice once in a while.

OMG, bend over and say AHHHHHHHHH

Repeating what you hear in alleyways from your job as a streetwalker?

Dumb bitch.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

So, you still can't refute what I posted, and now you've resorted to name-calling. That's grand coming from a half-wit like yourself. You are the same dumbass who started a thread about one of Cain's accusers supposedly working for the Obama administration. Not only were you wrong, but the lady is in fact a REGISTERED REPUBLICAN. I think I'll take whatever you claim to know about the Constitution with a fucking ocean of salt.

ROFLMAO You whine like a pantied bitchboy regarding being called names and do that very thing a sentence later.. OMG, bend over and say AHHHHHHHHH

I'm not whining. I'm simply stating that because you can't refute my posts, you resort to name-calling. I have no problem with insults, but some substance would be nice once in a while....you stupid fucking ****....you like that one?

What's wrong?? Hit a nerve?? LMAO

 

[J.E.D]

ROFLMAO You whine like a pantied bitchboy regarding being called names and do that very thing a sentence later.. OMG, bend over and say AHHHHHHHHH

I'm not whining. I'm simply stating that because you can't refute my posts, you resort to name-calling. I have no problem with insults, but some substance would be nice once in a while....you stupid fucking ****....you like that one?

What's wrong?? Hit a nerve?? LMAO

You? Get under my skin? I worry more about hangnails than I do about dumb ass posts. I owned you over and over, and all you can come up with is what you fantasize is in the Constitution and your weak attempts at what you perceive as quick-witted insults. You are definitely one of the dumbest posters on here. I'd say you're at least smarter than Willowtree, but even that mindless troll deserves more respect than that. You are a fucking idiot. That's about as nice as I can put it.

 

[ogibillm]

Do you have some analyses to back that up, or is it little more than your usual rhetorical flourish?

{President Barack Obama unveiled a stopgap plan Monday to ease the bite of the real estate crisis for cash-strapped homeowners while attacking Congress for blocking spending to create more jobs.

"These steps aren't a substitute for the bold action we need to create jobs and grow the economy, but they will make a difference," Obama said.

Thwarted by Republican opposition to his bigger jobs and stimulus package, Obama has shifted tactics by looking for action he can take without congressional approval to provide at least modest economic relief.

"So I'm here to say to all of you... that we can't wait for an increasingly dysfunctional Congress to do its job. Where they won't act, I will," Obama said.}

Obama openly violated the US Constitution and assumed dictatorial powers.

do you believe that actually supports your assertion in any way?

look, it should be easy for someone as certain as yourself - show us the executive order that violates the constitution - or admit you're full of shit.

easy-peasy

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Ron Paul apparently has a warning for America.

Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) says President Obama's continued use of the executive order "brings the modern presidency dangerously close to an elective dictatorship."

"That is arrogant," Paul said of Obama frequently using the executive order function as of late. "It is flaunting the Constitution and the whole principle of how we’re supposed to operate. The idea they can just do this and take over the legislative function and brag about it -- and Congress does nothing and the courts do nothing about it, it's very, very bad."

"He's dictatorial, is what he is," Rep. Paul said before the end of the interview.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/09/ron_paul_obama_presidency
_on_the_verge_of_being_a_dictatorship.html

Really? What's the number of EOs that Obama has signed in a little less than 3 years? The answer is 100.

In 8 years in office, Reagan signed 381 Executive Orders.

Based on the numbers, who better qualifies as a dictator?

You can check the numbers at the link below.


Barack Obama Executive Orders Disposition Tables

How many times has obama side stepped congress?

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

I'm not whining. I'm simply stating that because you can't refute my posts, you resort to name-calling. I have no problem with insults, but some substance would be nice once in a while....you stupid fucking ****....you like that one?

What's wrong?? Hit a nerve?? LMAO

You? Get under my skin? I worry more about hangnails than I do about dumb ass posts. I owned you over and over, and all you can come up with is what you fantasize is in the Constitution and your weak attempts at what you perceive as quick-witted insults. You are definitely one of the dumbest posters on here. I'd say you're at least smarter than Willowtree, but even that mindless troll deserves more respect than that. You are a fucking idiot. That's about as nice as I can put it.

Get your own lines whiner.. You just copied word for word what I already said.. wow.. Dumb as a stump.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

What kind of imbecilic goob can't understand the Constitution?? A leftist dumbwit.. that's who.. These people actually get to vote.. frightening isn't it?

 

[J.E.D]

What's wrong?? Hit a nerve?? LMAO

You? Get under my skin? I worry more about hangnails than I do about dumb ass posts. I owned you over and over, and all you can come up with is what you fantasize is in the Constitution and your weak attempts at what you perceive as quick-witted insults. You are definitely one of the dumbest posters on here. I'd say you're at least smarter than Willowtree, but even that mindless troll deserves more respect than that. You are a fucking idiot. That's about as nice as I can put it.

Get your own lines whiner.. You just copied word for word what I already said.. wow.. Dumb as a stump.

You are a fucking liar.

 

[J.E.D]

What kind of imbecilic goob can't understand the Constitution?? A leftist dumbwit.. that's who.. These people actually get to vote.. frightening isn't it?

You, apparently. EO's aren't unconstitutional. Every president in the history of the US has issued them. Moron.