Romney's return to public life stokes speculation about potential 2016 run

She's not really in tune with the gop on affirm action and contraceptive choice though. I mean if the party wasn't big enough for colin powell, it's time to give up on that tack.
 
.

I really think this will be the year of the Tea Party-approved GOP candidate.

I can't imagine a Jeb or a Christie or a Romney making it through the gauntlet this time around.

Full disclosure, I'm terrible at political predictions.

:popcorn:

.

The question is whether a sane candidate can get TP support. Scott Walker very possibly. Maybe Snyder too. In sum, I think the fiscal issues can be nuanced, but the social issues remain the bane of the gop.
 
Democrats have started the rumor of another Romney run. No matter how many times the Romney refute it. The Romneys give the distinct impression that the reason isn't a lack of will. It's the horrible treatment given to Ann Romney. Her illness became the weapon of choice among democrats. The Romneys underestimated democrat hate. Even if Mitt thought of making another run himself he won't put his wife through that again.
 
Democrats have started the rumor of another Romney run. No matter how many times the Romney refute it. The Romneys give the distinct impression that the reason isn't a lack of will. It's the horrible treatment given to Ann Romney. Her illness became the weapon of choice among democrats. The Romneys underestimated democrat hate. Even if Mitt thought of making another run himself he won't put his wife through that again.



Uh, the article is from FOX NEWS. Did you even read boop's op?
 
Democrats have started the rumor of another Romney run. No matter how many times the Romney refute it. The Romneys give the distinct impression that the reason isn't a lack of will. It's the horrible treatment given to Ann Romney. Her illness became the weapon of choice among democrats. The Romneys underestimated democrat hate. Even if Mitt thought of making another run himself he won't put his wife through that again.



Uh, the article is from FOX NEWS. Did you even read boop's op?

You read the article? What part of flat "no" did you find ambiguous? The rumors remain democrat rumors no matter who is reporting on them.
 
Democrats have started the rumor of another Romney run. No matter how many times the Romney refute it. The Romneys give the distinct impression that the reason isn't a lack of will. It's the horrible treatment given to Ann Romney. Her illness became the weapon of choice among democrats. The Romneys underestimated democrat hate. Even if Mitt thought of making another run himself he won't put his wife through that again.



Uh, the article is from FOX NEWS. Did you even read boop's op?

You read the article? What part of flat "no" did you find ambiguous? The rumors remain democrat rumors no matter who is reporting on them.



if it is such a flat no, then why did FOX even take the time to report it?
 
I don't know but if you read the article, Romney couldn't have been more emphatic. Democrats created the rumor and Fox reported on a public appearance.
 
Democrats have started the rumor of another Romney run. No matter how many times the Romney refute it. The Romneys give the distinct impression that the reason isn't a lack of will. It's the horrible treatment given to Ann Romney. Her illness became the weapon of choice among democrats. The Romneys underestimated democrat hate. Even if Mitt thought of making another run himself he won't put his wife through that again.

Really? The OP was provided by Fox News.

Is there a glitch in the Matrix?
 
Democrats have started the rumor of another Romney run. No matter how many times the Romney refute it. The Romneys give the distinct impression that the reason isn't a lack of will. It's the horrible treatment given to Ann Romney. Her illness became the weapon of choice among democrats. The Romneys underestimated democrat hate. Even if Mitt thought of making another run himself he won't put his wife through that again.



Uh, the article is from FOX NEWS. Did you even read boop's op?

You read the article? What part of flat "no" did you find ambiguous? The rumors remain democrat rumors no matter who is reporting on them.

Prove it. Surely you have a paper trail. An article. Your dog's poop reading.

Anything.

:cuckoo:
 
Were Romney to be nominated in 2016, he would be the first losing nominee to get a second chance back to back since Adlai E. Stevenson III (1952, 1956), but the much better parallel would be to fellow Republican Thomas E. Dewey (1944, 1948), because Dewey got beat by two different guys (FDR, then Truman).

Just to think, it's been 60 years since something like that has happened.

Well,,,that truly was a "little known fact"!
 

Attachments

  • $Cliff.jpg
    $Cliff.jpg
    7.7 KB · Views: 72

Forum List

Back
Top