Romney visits Solyndra

There is no point there??

It is astounding how you leftists tolerate this batshit crazy Obamafuck...

You're so fucking partisan that Obama could sacrifice his daughters on the White House lawn and you would applaud him.

It is fucking disgusting.... The guy can do no wrong in your eyes......

Yeah...

Let me ask you something:

Why is the American solar industry failing, when there's clearly a demand for their product?

Why is the Chinese solar industry dominating the world market right now?

Answer those questions and then get back to me on Solyndra. K?

That's an easy one and has virtually NOTHING to do politics or subsidies. They caught up to us because idiot American businesses set them up with solar production facilities and GAVE THEM THE KEY TECHNOLOGY to do it. All because idiot American businesses think that they can use Chinese labor without their products being stolen.

It's far cheaper to set up manufacturing over there still. And the technology is so mature that no further MAJOR development is neccessary. Especially of the gimmickry type that Solyndra was pushing..

Here's the bottom line you party animal... China LETS it HAPPEN. Obama tries to FORCE it to HAPPEN.. Which is more successful???
 
Maddow is a crypto-genius compared to Mr. Nick. He would stand there with a 'doh' look as she tore him up.
Really?? because I have never lost a debate against a progressive - they're the ones who run home with their tail between their legs looking for citations to back their shit up - which is usually nothing more than op-ed bullshit anyways which doesn't amount to much.... You see snot bubble - in the real world - in the intelligent world - opinions don't mean dick - facts do, but opinions don't. Maddow wouldn't last 5 minutes with me.... I believe in truth and she believes in her ego and what makes her feel good and justified. Truth always wins in a debate.
Nick, you haven't much of anything against anybody. Why? Because you are a crypto-libertarian who does not really understand what that mean. Maddow would make your look what you truly are on these matters: ignorant, truculent, and stubbornly unwise.
 
China has been slipping for quite awhile now, the financials know it, today is one example:

China manufacturing PMI falls sharply - May. 31, 2012

China's manufacturing slows to a crawl
By CNNMoney Staff @CNNMoney June 1, 2012:

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- China's closely watched manufacturing sector took a hit in May, as two reports issued Friday indicated the country's factories continue to struggle amid global economic woes.

The weak manufacturing reports lead industry analysts to believe the government will step in to boost infrastructure investment and cut banking rates.

"May's weaker growth data reinforces the case for more decisive easing actions," said Sun Junwei, China economist with HSBC." Beijing policy makers have proved their ability to reflate when necessary. Fears about a sharp growth slowdown are overplayed."

...

China is one of the few places where there was growth, it's been difficult to tell what has really been going on there the past months.
 
Maddow is a crypto-genius compared to Mr. Nick. He would stand there with a 'doh' look as she tore him up.

Really?? because I have never lost a debate against a progressive - they're the ones who run home with their tail between their legs looking for citations to back their shit up - which is usually nothing more than op-ed bullshit anyways which doesn't amount to much....

You see snot bubble - in the real world - in the intelligent world - opinions don't mean dick - facts do, but opinions don't.

Maddow wouldn't last 5 minutes with me.... I believe in truth and she believes in her ego and what makes her feel good and justified.

Truth always wins in a debate.

Your arrogance is only exceeded by your ignorance.
 
Great, did he meet with the Solyndra employees and explain to them how he's going to stop Chinese subsidization of their Solar industry so American solar manufacturers don't go bankrupt anymore?

No, I imagine he didn't talk about that part much, did he?

Give him a chance.
Obama has been President for 4 years and hasn't explained it. :eusa_hand:
 
Maddow is a crypto-genius compared to Mr. Nick. He would stand there with a 'doh' look as she tore him up.
Really?? because I have never lost a debate against a progressive - they're the ones who run home with their tail between their legs looking for citations to back their shit up - which is usually nothing more than op-ed bullshit anyways which doesn't amount to much.... You see snot bubble - in the real world - in the intelligent world - opinions don't mean dick - facts do, but opinions don't. Maddow wouldn't last 5 minutes with me.... I believe in truth and she believes in her ego and what makes her feel good and justified. Truth always wins in a debate.
Nick, you haven't much of anything against anybody. Why? Because you are a crypto-libertarian who does not really understand what that mean. Maddow would make your look what you truly are on these matters: ignorant, truculent, and stubbornly unwise.

Your support of a fair left wacko is not surprising.
 
Why was investing $500,000,000 in Solyndra a good idea? Surely obama knew what the Chinese were up to.

He knows how important the clean energy industry is to American interests.

He was fighting fire with fire.

The Germans and the French were doing the same thing.

Unfortunately, there's no way to keep up with subsidization when your competitor is a totalitarian socialist state.

So you know this, but Obama and his economic team didn't? And that ignorance is ok and I should vote for him, right?

The real reason why Solyndra got so much money was because of billionaire George Kaiser and his connection to Obama.

Remember when democrats pretended to be morally outraged at banks giving out bonuses while they were failing and getting taxpayer dollars?

Solyndra Executive Bonuses Kept Coming in 2011 : Greentech Media

Karen Alter, Senior Vice President of Marketing at Solyndra, received $55,000 on April 15, 2011 and $55,000 on July 8 to go along with her quarter-million-dollar salary. Ben Bierman picked up $60,000 on April 15 and another $60,000 on July 8 to supplement his $276,000 salary. Bierman was EVP of Operations and Engineering and was presenting cheery, optimistic PowerPoint obfuscation sessions as late as July, as well.

Wilbur Stover, Solyndra's CFO and a veteran of the Micron price-fixing scandal, had a $367,000 salary and also collected at least $120,000 in bonuses. He joined CEO Brian Harrison in pleading the Fifth Amendment while under congressional questioning.

Paula Camporaso, VP of Information Technology; Dave Sanat, Vice President of Supply Chain; and John Gaffney, Corporate Counsel were among the many Solyndrans also collecting substantial bonuses.
 
You really should watch Rachel Maddow; you would appear less foolish. Tonight for example Ms. Maddow discussed Solyndra and two other failed projects supported by the government: Acusphere and Spherics, Inc (both of which got taxpayer money).

The government which provided the money was ..................drum beat: Massachusetts.

No thanks Maddow is not really my cup of tea..............however......have you checked Obama's other investments in solar........oh snap, that's right he doesn't care, IT'S NOT HIS MONEY, IT'S MINE AND YOURS, AND YOURS AND YOURS.

The "government" has no business investing taxpayer dollars in failed businesses...........unless you don't give a crap about taxpayer money.

It's nice to hear you admit to being willfully ignorant, so many on the right refues to take that first step. Oh, and BTW, do you know who was the Governor of MA and gave taxpayer money to Acusphere and Spherics? (shhhhhh mitt romney)

Watch out Wry, that's 2 posts in this thread where you've accidentally complimented Romney. You support wasting american taxpayer dollars are soon to be bankrupt companies, and you're trying to say Romney is more responsible for that than Obama.

Sounds like your Obamabot software may need to be updated so you don't make the "mistake" of complimenting Romney again.
 
Lolol I heard this and I have to say it was impressive. The Romney is getting going and if this is the beginning, Obama is in deep shit. It was awesomtastic.
 
You know, I love how right-wingers talk about Solyndra like they have some kind of point.

When really the only point that there is to make about Solyndra is that the Chinese gave more of a shit about controlling the clean energy market than we did.

Yet in your first post you blamed the right.

It is not the job of our govt to prop up American business if it is not marketable against the competition no matter where that competition comes from.
 
Great, did he meet with the Solyndra employees and explain to them how he's going to stop Chinese subsidization of their Solar industry so American solar manufacturers don't go bankrupt anymore?

No, I imagine he didn't talk about that part much, did he?

He talked about that part as much as Obama did. And Romney didn't cost the American taxpayers half a trillion dollars.
 
You know, I love how right-wingers talk about Solyndra like they have some kind of point.

When really the only point that there is to make about Solyndra is that the Chinese gave more of a shit about controlling the clean energy market than we did.

Total bullshit. Tell us how many coal fired electrical plants China puts in operation every week.
 
Romney did very well on this, rocking Obama on his heels.

The Mittster needs to keep doing this while making sure not to pander to the far wackaloony right.
 
Maddow is a crypto-genius compared to Mr. Nick. He would stand there with a 'doh' look as she tore him up.
Really?? because I have never lost a debate against a progressive - they're the ones who run home with their tail between their legs looking for citations to back their shit up - which is usually nothing more than op-ed bullshit anyways which doesn't amount to much.... You see snot bubble - in the real world - in the intelligent world - opinions don't mean dick - facts do, but opinions don't. Maddow wouldn't last 5 minutes with me.... I believe in truth and she believes in her ego and what makes her feel good and justified. Truth always wins in a debate.
Nick, you haven't much of anything against anybody. Why? Because you are a crypto-libertarian who does not really understand what that mean. Maddow would make your look what you truly are on these matters: ignorant, truculent, and stubbornly unwise.

I don't understand?

NO - you don't understand..... You don't know the difference between op-ed and fact - neither does that little boy Maddow........

I'd have Maddow stuttering and backpeddling in a few minutes on any issue she would wish to discuss....
 
Nick, we have you stuttering here in five minutes. She would make you look so stupid you would have to become gay to repent of your stupidity.
 
Nick, we have you stuttering here in five minutes. She would make you look so stupid you would have to become gay to repent of your stupidity.

:lol:

I have far more knowledge than she does, not to mention I'm interested in facts, not an official party position - because I'm not a republican nor a democrat.

All she does is go after RINO's and others with partisan "right wing" politics...

That shit wouldn't work on me.

All she does is attack those on the right who say controversial things or take a controversial positions on issues, then offer her opinion as being the right opinion - when in reality 90% of the time that little boy has no justification for her position other than her own fucked up ego..... Constitutionally the little boy Maddow is wrong on just about everything, not to mention she ignores the constitution 90% of the time.

Stephanie Miller is the same way......

You see - I'm not interested in what YOU or anyone else THINKS is correct -- I'm interested in what IS CORRECT AND LEGALLY JUSTIFIED via the Bill of Rights and Constitution...

Understand that???
 
Nick, son, you have nothing here for us except loads of entertainment as you stumble and bumble along,
 
Really?? because I have never lost a debate against a progressive - they're the ones who run home with their tail between their legs looking for citations to back their shit up - which is usually nothing more than op-ed bullshit anyways which doesn't amount to much.... You see snot bubble - in the real world - in the intelligent world - opinions don't mean dick - facts do, but opinions don't. Maddow wouldn't last 5 minutes with me.... I believe in truth and she believes in her ego and what makes her feel good and justified. Truth always wins in a debate.
Nick, you haven't much of anything against anybody. Why? Because you are a crypto-libertarian who does not really understand what that mean. Maddow would make your look what you truly are on these matters: ignorant, truculent, and stubbornly unwise.

I don't understand?

NO - you don't understand..... You don't know the difference between op-ed and fact - neither does that little boy Maddow........

I'd have Maddow stuttering and backpeddling in a few minutes on any issue she would wish to discuss....

Actually -- I used to love Rachael in print. Especially her deep analytical stuff for The Nation and other journals. She got into MSNBC and lost all of her integrity. Really sloppy now in reasoning and too little attention to REAL facts. Things she calls "facts" -- are really opinion or leftist meme...

I'd give ANYTHING for a few COMPETENT leftists to debate. :cool: :cool:

There's a couple around that still get me thinking. But the good ones are being replaced or reprogrammed like MSNBC did to Maddow and Scarborough..
 

Forum List

Back
Top