martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 85,271
- 35,715
- 2,300
None that you folks will believe.
Government Job Loss: President Obamas Catch 22 - ABC News
Democrats Hit Mitt Romney for Comment on Teachers, First Responders - ABC News
You should be cheering this..no?
If the jobs are redundant, then yes. Why keep jobs we no longer need? How much you want to bet most of the jobs lost are due to demographic and population changes, where the number of workers exceeds the number required for the current population?
You also didnt answer the part of my question to where federal jobs have been lost.
I posted public sector jobs.
In any case..you don't have a problem with it.
So..there is no argument here. You applaud this.
The original post was about eliminating 280,000 federal jobs. You then brought up the unemployment numbers and said they are mostly due to public sector, but state and local.
I dont like continuing any jobs that become redundant or uneconomical.
You still HAVE NOT answered my question regarding the current loss of federal jobs, which I do not see happening.